Glossary

From RhetorClick

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(S)
(A)
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Affective Fallacy''': Wimsatt and Berdsley claimed that evaluating literature by the way it affects the reader is uselessly subjective.  Again, literature should be evaluated through its use of language, not outside factors (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])
*'''Affective Fallacy''': Wimsatt and Berdsley claimed that evaluating literature by the way it affects the reader is uselessly subjective.  Again, literature should be evaluated through its use of language, not outside factors (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])
-
*'''Aleatoric''': according to chance (Lunsford and Ede [[January 20 Class Notes]])
+
*'''Aleatoric''': according to chance [["On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric" by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]
*'''Ambiguity''': Richards showed how under-examined ambiguities can lead to misinterpretation of an entire work (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])
*'''Ambiguity''': Richards showed how under-examined ambiguities can lead to misinterpretation of an entire work (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])
-
*'''Animism''': according to Aristotle, all objects have souls (Lunsford and Ede [[January 20 Class Notes]])
+
*'''Animism''': according to Aristotle, all objects have souls [["On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric" by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]
-
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart, companion (Lunsford and Ede [[January 20 Class Notes]])
+
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart, companion [["On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric" by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]
== B ==
== B ==

Revision as of 15:05, 7 April 2011

This page is dedicated to key terms from the readings.


Contents

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Site Navigation
Wiki Help
Toolbox