https://rhetorclick.com/index.php?feed=atom&target=Juliette&title=Special%3AContributions%2FJuliette 2026-05-16T02:36:12Z From RhetorClick MediaWiki 1.16.1 https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T18:07:03Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time was spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for the wiki (based loosely on wikipedia's guidelines) that fit our mission statement of ensuring usability<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Article Summaries'''<br /> * added &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; section for contributors to add opinions about readings and, hopefully, start a discussion about their impressions of the readings. These opinions will also be a helpful resource for students who are having trouble deciphering articles' meanings.<br /> * added my opinions to the &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; sections of some articles<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information from reading responses to Authors' pages<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T18:06:24Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for the wiki (based loosely on wikipedia's guidelines) that fit our mission statement of ensuring usability<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Article Summaries'''<br /> * added &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; section for contributors to add opinions about readings and, hopefully, start a discussion about their impressions of the readings. These opinions will also be a helpful resource for students who are having trouble deciphering articles' meanings.<br /> * added my opinions to the &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; sections of some articles<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information from reading responses to Authors' pages<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T18:05:41Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for the wiki based loosely on wikipedia's guidelines, but adapted to fit our mission statement and ensure usability<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Article Summaries'''<br /> * added &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; section for contributors to add opinions about readings and, hopefully, start a discussion about their impressions of the readings. These opinions will also be a helpful resource for students who are having trouble deciphering articles' meanings.<br /> * added my opinions to the &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; sections of some articles<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information from reading responses to Authors' pages<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T18:04:07Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for the wiki<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Article Summaries'''<br /> * added &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; section for contributors to add opinions about readings and, hopefully, start a discussion about their impressions of the readings. These opinions will also be a helpful resource for students who are having trouble deciphering articles' meanings.<br /> * added my opinions to the &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; sections of some articles<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information from reading responses to Authors' pages<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T18:03:37Z

<p>Juliette: /* Wiki Contributions */</p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for pages on the wiki<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Article Summaries'''<br /> * added &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; section for contributors to add opinions about readings and, hopefully, start a discussion about their impressions of the readings. These opinions will also be a helpful resource for students who are having trouble deciphering articles' meanings.<br /> * added my opinions to the &quot;Additional Thoughts&quot; sections of some articles<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information from reading responses to Authors' pages<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Ohmann,_Richard_%E2%80%9CIn_Lieu_of_a_New_Rhetoric%E2%80%9D 2011-05-12T17:57:27Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Summary'''<br /> <br /> In “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric,” [[Richard Ohmann]] starts by acknowledging the past perceptions of rhetoric as a “mysterious power” and as a “calculated procedure” bond in the similar characteristic of dealing with persuasion (298). He continues by contrasting the views of many of the new rhetoricians like I.A. Richards, Daniel Fogarty, and Richard Weaver--to name a few. He then states his purpose: “suggest one way in which contemporary ideas of rhetoric...resemble each other more than any of them resembles older ideas” (300). This similarity between the contemporary ideas is that they open the term rhetoric to incorporate a broader spectrum of linguistic activity; this is different from the classical view of rhetoric as persuasion. Ohmann outlines these relationships using five aspects: the relationship between the rhetor and the audience in which new rhetoric encompasses a more mutual relationship, rhetoric as a pursuit versus the transmission of truth, candor as a necessary condition of making rhetoric, the attribution of how much a work reflects the author (only in style says new rhetoricians), and rhetoric reflecting the concepts of a world view (of the world, community, group, or an individual). Ohmann continues to discuss rhetoric in terms of teaching freshman-level college students. He states that the current methods of grammarian rules, etc. are not affective in the classroom. Rather, he proposes a “four-part framework” for teaching freshman. First, the students must understand “the relationship between a piece of writing and its content.Then, they should be taught the “relationship between a piece of writing and its author” and its relationship with the audience (304). And, final idea they should learn is that of the world views previously discussed by Ohmann.<br /> <br /> '''Additional Thoughts''' (Feel free to add your opinions here!)<br /> <br /> In Ohmann, I thought the section about teaching English at the college level to adhere to his ideas about Modern Rhetoric were good. I appreciated how he started off by acknowledging that many college freshman don’t have enough of a grasp on the English language to even begin thinking about rhetoric, and I appreciated that he made an attempt to propose a structured curriculum to follow. However, I disagree with the idea that, if professors explain to their freshmen the importance of mastering the English language so they can participate in a “linguistic community,” the students will have a profound respect for the language. I think that’s a wonderful theory (and I wish it would happen that way); however, I feel like many freshmen who don’t know even basic grammar won’t care about the significance of language in our culture. If they didn’t care enough in high school to learn grammar, they probably won’t care about this either. (I do concede that not all students who don’t know grammar are slackers or don’t care, but I still think his idea is better in theory. What typical college freshmen do you know who care about becoming a successful part of a linguistic community?)<br /> <br /> I do agree with his idea that students should be made aware of all the syntactic patterns they have at their disposal. It’s always a relief to remember that there is no one way to write a sentence -- it takes some of the pressure off being “perfect” and allows me to write as an expression of myself, my ideas, and my beliefs (not some else’s).</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Corder,_Jim_W._%22Argument_as_Emergence,_Rhetoric_as_Love%22 2011-05-12T17:55:46Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Summary'''<br /> <br /> In “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love,” [[Jim W. Corder]] claims that we are all constantly creating and adapting our own narratives and arguments as we live our lives. However, sometimes we will come across the narrative/argument of another that conflicts with or undermines ours. What to do in such a situation? Corder first references the therapeutic techniques of Carl Rogers, which were adapted to a rhetorical philosophy based on mutual understanding of the positions of each rhetor. But Corder thinks this isn’t sufficient to resolve some conflicts, as with heated political issues like abortion or war. In these situations he proposes we “see each other,” “know each other,” “be present to each other,” and “embrace each other” (421). As he writes, argument is not a display or presentation; it is an emergence towards the other: rhetoric should allow for a more commodious space in which conflicting views can coexist. Corder offers a variety of ways to facilitate this, such as learning to argue provisionally, or to remain “perpetually open and always closing” (425).<br /> <br /> '''Additional Thoughts''' (feel free to add your own opinions here!)<br /> <br /> Continuing with the idea of looking at and teaching arguments in the dramatic contexts in which they typically occur, I tend to agree with Corder. I know at some point in class discussion, someone mentioned that it is not helpful to put the human-condition lens on arguments when trying to study them, but I disagree. I think we need to always take human condition into account when studying anything -- especially argumentation; otherwise, what we do in the classroom is merely theory. If we can’t go out and put into practice what we are learning, then what is the point? And I believe that learning to deal with the human condition of elevated emotions -- fear, denial, anger, passion, etc -- is one of the most important things we, as rhetoricians and rhetors, can do. If we closes ourselves off to analyzing theories in a vacuum, we just might be setting ourselves up to fail in practice. (And, we are going directly against Corder’s idea of constantly opening ourselves up to the world around us.)</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Corder,_Jim_W._%22Argument_as_Emergence,_Rhetoric_as_Love%22 2011-05-12T17:55:34Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Summary'''<br /> In “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love,” [[Jim W. Corder]] claims that we are all constantly creating and adapting our own narratives and arguments as we live our lives. However, sometimes we will come across the narrative/argument of another that conflicts with or undermines ours. What to do in such a situation? Corder first references the therapeutic techniques of Carl Rogers, which were adapted to a rhetorical philosophy based on mutual understanding of the positions of each rhetor. But Corder thinks this isn’t sufficient to resolve some conflicts, as with heated political issues like abortion or war. In these situations he proposes we “see each other,” “know each other,” “be present to each other,” and “embrace each other” (421). As he writes, argument is not a display or presentation; it is an emergence towards the other: rhetoric should allow for a more commodious space in which conflicting views can coexist. Corder offers a variety of ways to facilitate this, such as learning to argue provisionally, or to remain “perpetually open and always closing” (425).<br /> <br /> '''Additional Thoughts''' (feel free to add your own opinions here!)<br /> <br /> Continuing with the idea of looking at and teaching arguments in the dramatic contexts in which they typically occur, I tend to agree with Corder. I know at some point in class discussion, someone mentioned that it is not helpful to put the human-condition lens on arguments when trying to study them, but I disagree. I think we need to always take human condition into account when studying anything -- especially argumentation; otherwise, what we do in the classroom is merely theory. If we can’t go out and put into practice what we are learning, then what is the point? And I believe that learning to deal with the human condition of elevated emotions -- fear, denial, anger, passion, etc -- is one of the most important things we, as rhetoricians and rhetors, can do. If we closes ourselves off to analyzing theories in a vacuum, we just might be setting ourselves up to fail in practice. (And, we are going directly against Corder’s idea of constantly opening ourselves up to the world around us.)</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Corder,_Jim_W._%22Argument_as_Emergence,_Rhetoric_as_Love%22 2011-05-12T17:55:14Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>In “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love,” [[Jim W. Corder]] claims that we are all constantly creating and adapting our own narratives and arguments as we live our lives. However, sometimes we will come across the narrative/argument of another that conflicts with or undermines ours. What to do in such a situation? Corder first references the therapeutic techniques of Carl Rogers, which were adapted to a rhetorical philosophy based on mutual understanding of the positions of each rhetor. But Corder thinks this isn’t sufficient to resolve some conflicts, as with heated political issues like abortion or war. In these situations he proposes we “see each other,” “know each other,” “be present to each other,” and “embrace each other” (421). As he writes, argument is not a display or presentation; it is an emergence towards the other: rhetoric should allow for a more commodious space in which conflicting views can coexist. Corder offers a variety of ways to facilitate this, such as learning to argue provisionally, or to remain “perpetually open and always closing” (425).<br /> <br /> '''Additional Thoughts''' (feel free to add your own opinions here!)<br /> <br /> Continuing with the idea of looking at and teaching arguments in the dramatic contexts in which they typically occur, I tend to agree with Corder. I know at some point in class discussion, someone mentioned that it is not helpful to put the human-condition lens on arguments when trying to study them, but I disagree. I think we need to always take human condition into account when studying anything -- especially argumentation; otherwise, what we do in the classroom is merely theory. If we can’t go out and put into practice what we are learning, then what is the point? And I believe that learning to deal with the human condition of elevated emotions -- fear, denial, anger, passion, etc -- is one of the most important things we, as rhetoricians and rhetors, can do. If we closes ourselves off to analyzing theories in a vacuum, we just might be setting ourselves up to fail in practice. (And, we are going directly against Corder’s idea of constantly opening ourselves up to the world around us.)</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T17:51:27Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for pages on the wiki<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information to Bakhtin's page<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T17:50:04Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for pages on the wiki<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information to Bakhtin's page<br /> *<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Juliette 2011-05-12T17:49:28Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>I am a senior (obviously!), and I am currently in the process of applying to graduate schools for technical communication, rhetoric, and/or professional writing. I currently work as a technical editor at IBM/Tivoli Software and have an internship with the Writers' League of Texas. I am a musician - I sing and play the flute, piano, and guitar - and music is my favorite way to escape from reality. I come from a rather large family and spending time with my nieces and nephews (there are 11 of them!) is one of my absolute favorite things to do!<br /> <br /> == Wiki Contributions ==<br /> <br /> '''Editing Guidelines''' (majority of time spent on this contribution)<br /> * created the editing guidelines for pages on the wiki<br /> * re-formatted existing pages to fit these guidelines<br /> <br /> '''Author Pages'''<br /> * added information to Bakhtin's page<br /> <br /> '''Resources''' <br /> * found and added resources, including Figures of Speech website, STC website, Rhetoric and Composition blog, and CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition website</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2011-05-12T17:37:41Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page links to in-depth article summaries from prominent authors in this field. Links are organized by author's last name.<br /> <br /> == A ==<br /> == B ==<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> == C ==<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> == D == <br /> == E ==<br /> == F ==<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> == G ==<br /> == H ==<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> == I ==<br /> == J ==<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> == K ==<br /> == L ==<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> == M ==<br /> == N ==<br /> == O ==<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> == P ==<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> == Q ==<br /> == R ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> == S ==<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> == T ==<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U ==<br /> == V ==<br /> == W ==<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == X ==<br /> == Y ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> == Z ==</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2011-05-12T17:37:03Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page links to in-depth article summaries from prominent authors in the rhetoric field. Links are organized by author's last name.<br /> <br /> == A ==<br /> == B ==<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> == C ==<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> == D == <br /> == E ==<br /> == F ==<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> == G ==<br /> == H ==<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> == I ==<br /> == J ==<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> == K ==<br /> == L ==<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> == M ==<br /> == N ==<br /> == O ==<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> == P ==<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> == Q ==<br /> == R ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> == S ==<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> == T ==<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U ==<br /> == V ==<br /> == W ==<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == X ==<br /> == Y ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> == Z ==</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2011-05-12T17:35:31Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>== A ==<br /> == B ==<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> == C ==<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> == D == <br /> == E ==<br /> == F ==<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> == G ==<br /> == H ==<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> == I ==<br /> == J ==<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> == K ==<br /> == L ==<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> == M ==<br /> == N ==<br /> == O ==<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> == P ==<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> == Q ==<br /> == R ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> == S ==<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> == T ==<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U ==<br /> == V ==<br /> == W ==<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == X ==<br /> == Y ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> == Z ==</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements 2011-05-12T17:30:00Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page discusses key rhetorical movements and the theories associated with those movements.<br /> <br /> == Semiotics ==<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]], 1857-1913: [[signified and signifier are core of semiotics]]<br /> <br /> [[Roland Barthes]], 1915-1980: author and scriptor, neutral and novelistic writing<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], 1895-1975: [[Polyphony]], [[Unfinalizability]], [[Carnival and Grotesque]], [[Chronotope]], [[Heteroglossia]] (&quot;The Dialogic Imagination&quot;), [[Speech genres]]<br /> <br /> == Literary Criticism ==<br /> <br /> [[I. A. Richards]], 1893-1979: father of [[New Criticism]]<br /> <br /> == New Rhetorics ==<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]], 1897-1993: [[Dramatistic Pentad]] (act, scene, agent, agency, purpose), [[Definition of Man]] as symbol-using animal<br /> <br /> [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Chaim_Perelman Chaim Perelman], 1912-1984: [[New Rhetorics]]<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]], 1905-1987: [[definitions of rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> == Rogerian Rhetoric ==<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]], 1929-1998: [[argument as emergence toward the other]]<br /> <br /> [[Douglas Brent]]: [[Rogerian Rhetoric as an alternative to Traditional Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> == Post-Structuralism ==<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]], 1926-1984: [[author-function]]<br /> <br /> == Pedagogical Studies ==<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]], b. 1947<br /> <br /> == Writing and Technology ==<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]] and [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]:<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]], b. 1944:<br /> <br /> [[Andrea A. Lunsford]], b. 1942:<br /> <br /> == Uncategorized ==<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]], 1910-1963: man's nature is fourfold (rational, emotional, ethical, religious), [[God and Devil Terms]], [[Noble Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]], 1922-2009: [[Toulmin Model of Argument]]<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]], b. 1928: [[Epistemic Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]], b. 1931: <br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]], b. 1939: [[Rhetoric in Existentialist Literature]]<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]]:<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]]:<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]:<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]: <br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]:<br /> <br /> [[Steven Fraiberg]]:<br /> <br /> Sorapure et al.?<br /> <br /> Palmquist et al.?<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]] and [[Steven D. Krause]]:<br /> <br /> [[Douglas Downs]] and [[Elizabeth Wardle]]:</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T17:26:49Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Socrates]] 469 BC–399 BC<br /> <br /> [[Plato]] 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> [[Aristotles]] 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] 1857-1913<br /> <br /> [[I.A. Richards]] 1893-1979<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] 1895-1975<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]] 1897-1993<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]] 1905-1987<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]] 1910-1963<br /> <br /> [[Chaim Perelman]] 1912-1984<br /> <br /> [[Ronald Barthes]] 1915-1980<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]] 1922-2009<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]] 1926-1984<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]] 1928-present<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]] 1930-present<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]] 1931-present<br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]] 1939-present<br /> <br /> [[Andrea A. Lunsford]] 1942-present<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]] 1944-present<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]] 1947-present<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]] 1950-present<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]] 1952-2008<br /> <br /> [[Brent]]<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]] <br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]<br /> <br /> [[Mike Palmquist]]<br /> <br /> [[Madeleine Sorapure]]<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]<br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]]<br /> <br /> [[Steven D. Krause]]<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:59:08Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Andrea A. Lunsford]] 1942-present<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]] 1947-present<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] 1895-1975<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]] 1897-1993<br /> <br /> [[I.A. Richards]] 1893-1979<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] 1857-1913<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]] 1905-1987<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]] 1926-1984<br /> <br /> [[Ronald Barthes]] 1915-1980<br /> <br /> [[Chaim Perelman]] 1912-1984<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]] 1910-1963<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]] 1922-2009<br /> <br /> [[Brent]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]] 1931-<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]] 1928-present<br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]] 1939-present<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]] 1930-<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]] <br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]] 1944-present<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]] 1952-2008<br /> <br /> [[Mike Palmquist]]<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]] 1950-present<br /> <br /> [[Madeleine Sorapure]]<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]<br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]]<br /> <br /> [[Steven D. Krause]]<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]<br /> <br /> [[Aristotles]] 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> [[Plato]] 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> [[Socrates]] 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:58:42Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Andrea A. Lunsford]] 1942-present<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]] 1947-present<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] 1895-1975<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]] 1897-1993<br /> <br /> [[I.A. Richards]] 1893-1979<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] 1857-1913<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]] 1905-1987<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]] 1926-1984<br /> <br /> [[Ronald Barthes]] 1915-1980<br /> <br /> [[Chaim Perelman]] 1912-1984<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]] 1910-1963<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]] 1922-2009<br /> <br /> [[Brent]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]] 1931-<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]] 1928-present<br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]] 1939-present<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]] 1930-<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]] <br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]] 1944-present<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]] 1952-2008<br /> <br /> [[Mike Palmquist]]<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]] 1950-present<br /> <br /> [[Madeleine Sorapure]]<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]<br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]]<br /> <br /> [[Steven D. Krause]]<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]<br /> <br /> [[Aristotles]] 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> [[Plato]] 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> [[Socrates]] 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:58:03Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Andrea A. Lunsford]] 1942-present<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]] 1947-present<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] 1895-1975<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]] 1897-1993<br /> <br /> [[I.A. Richards]] 1893-1979<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] 1857-1913<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]] 1905-1987<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]] 1926-1984<br /> <br /> [[Ronald Barthes]] 1915-1980<br /> <br /> [[Chaim Perelman]] 1912-1984<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]] 1910-1963<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]] 1922-2009<br /> <br /> [[Brent]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]] 1931-<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]] 1928-present<br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]] 1939-present<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]] 1930-<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]] <br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]] 1944-present<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]] 1952-2008<br /> <br /> [[Mike Palmquist]]<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]] 1950-present<br /> <br /> [[Madeleine Sorapure]]<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]<br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]]<br /> <br /> [[Steven D. Krause]]<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]<br /> <br /> [[Aristotles]] 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> [[Plato]] 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> [[Socrates]] 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:54:48Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Andrea A. Lunsford]] 1942-present<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]] 1947-present<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] 1895-1975<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]] 1897-1993<br /> <br /> [[I.A. Richards]] 1893-1979<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] 1857-1913<br /> <br /> <br /> Donald C. Bryant 1905-1987<br /> <br /> <br /> Michel Foucault 1926-1984<br /> <br /> <br /> Ronald Barthes 1915-1980<br /> <br /> <br /> Chaim Perelman 1912-1984<br /> <br /> <br /> Richard Weaver 1910-1963<br /> <br /> <br /> Stephen Toulmin 1922-2009<br /> <br /> <br /> Brent<br /> <br /> <br /> Richard Ohmann 1931-<br /> <br /> <br /> Robert L. Scott 1928-present<br /> <br /> <br /> S. Michael Halloran 1939-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Jim W. Corder 1930-<br /> <br /> <br /> Cynthia L. Selfe <br /> <br /> <br /> Richard J. Selfe Jr.<br /> <br /> <br /> Dennis Baron 1944-present<br /> <br /> <br /> John M. Slatin 1952-2008<br /> <br /> <br /> Mike Palmquist<br /> <br /> <br /> Kathleen Blake Yancey 1950-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Madeleine Sorapure<br /> <br /> <br /> Johndan Johnson-Eilola<br /> <br /> <br /> Sean D. Williams<br /> <br /> <br /> Bill Hart-Davidson<br /> <br /> <br /> Steven D. Krause<br /> <br /> <br /> John Logie<br /> <br /> <br /> Aristotles 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> <br /> Plato 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> <br /> Socrates 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:53:37Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>Andrea A. Lunsford 1942-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Lisa S. Ede 1947-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Mikhail Bakhtin 1895-1975<br /> <br /> <br /> Kenneth Burke 1897-1993<br /> <br /> <br /> I.A. Richards 1893-1979<br /> <br /> <br /> Ferdinand de Saussure 1857-1913<br /> <br /> <br /> Donald C. Bryant 1905-1987<br /> <br /> <br /> Michel Foucault 1926-1984<br /> <br /> <br /> Ronald Barthes 1915-1980<br /> <br /> <br /> Chaim Perelman 1912-1984<br /> <br /> <br /> Richard Weaver 1910-1963<br /> <br /> <br /> Stephen Toulmin 1922-2009<br /> <br /> <br /> Brent<br /> <br /> <br /> Richard Ohmann 1931-<br /> <br /> <br /> Robert L. Scott 1928-present<br /> <br /> <br /> S. Michael Halloran 1939-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Jim W. Corder 1930-<br /> <br /> <br /> Cynthia L. Selfe <br /> <br /> <br /> Richard J. Selfe Jr.<br /> <br /> <br /> Dennis Baron 1944-present<br /> <br /> <br /> John M. Slatin 1952-2008<br /> <br /> <br /> Mike Palmquist<br /> <br /> <br /> Kathleen Blake Yancey 1950-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Madeleine Sorapure<br /> <br /> <br /> Johndan Johnson-Eilola<br /> <br /> <br /> Sean D. Williams<br /> <br /> <br /> Bill Hart-Davidson<br /> <br /> <br /> Steven D. Krause<br /> <br /> <br /> John Logie<br /> <br /> <br /> Aristotles 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> <br /> Plato 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> <br /> Socrates 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:53:01Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>Andrea A. Lunsford 1942-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Lisa S. Ede 1947-present<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Mikhail Bakhtin 1895-1975<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Kenneth Burke 1897-1993<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> I.A. Richards 1893-1979<br /> <br /> <br /> Ferdinand de Saussure 1857-1913<br /> <br /> <br /> Donald C. Bryant 1905-1987<br /> <br /> <br /> Michel Foucault 1926-1984<br /> <br /> <br /> Ronald Barthes 1915-1980<br /> <br /> <br /> Chaim Perelman 1912-1984<br /> <br /> <br /> Richard Weaver 1910-1963<br /> <br /> <br /> Stephen Toulmin 1922-2009<br /> <br /> <br /> Brent<br /> <br /> <br /> Richard Ohmann 1931-<br /> <br /> <br /> Robert L. Scott 1928-present<br /> <br /> <br /> S. Michael Halloran 1939-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Jim W. Corder 1930-<br /> <br /> <br /> Cynthia L. Selfe <br /> <br /> <br /> Richard J. Selfe Jr.<br /> <br /> <br /> Dennis Baron 1944-present<br /> <br /> <br /> John M. Slatin 1952-2008<br /> <br /> <br /> Mike Palmquist<br /> <br /> <br /> Kathleen Blake Yancey 1950-present<br /> <br /> <br /> Madeleine Sorapure<br /> <br /> <br /> Johndan Johnson-Eilola<br /> <br /> <br /> Sean D. Williams<br /> <br /> <br /> Bill Hart-Davidson<br /> <br /> <br /> Steven D. Krause<br /> <br /> <br /> John Logie<br /> <br /> <br /> Aristotles 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> <br /> <br /> Plato 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> <br /> <br /> Socrates 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Timeline 2011-05-12T14:51:28Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>Andrea A. Lunsford 1942-present<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> Lisa S. Ede 1947-present<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> Mikhail Bakhtin 1895-1975<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> Kenneth Burke 1897-1993<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> I.A. Richards 1893-1979<br /> Ferdinand de Saussure 1857-1913<br /> Donald C. Bryant 1905-1987<br /> Michel Foucault 1926-1984<br /> Ronald Barthes 1915-1980<br /> Chaim Perelman 1912-1984<br /> Richard Weaver 1910-1963<br /> Stephen Toulmin 1922-2009<br /> Brent<br /> Richard Ohmann 1931-<br /> Robert L. Scott 1928-present<br /> S. Michael Halloran 1939-present<br /> Jim W. Corder 1930-<br /> Cynthia L. Selfe <br /> Richard J. Selfe Jr.<br /> Dennis Baron 1944-present<br /> John M. Slatin 1952-2008<br /> Mike Palmquist<br /> Kathleen Blake Yancey 1950-present<br /> Madeleine Sorapure<br /> Johndan Johnson-Eilola<br /> Sean D. Williams<br /> Bill Hart-Davidson <br /> Steven D. Krause<br /> John Logie<br /> Aristotles 384 BC – 322 BC<br /> Plato 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC<br /> Socrates 469 BC–399 BC</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Directory 2011-05-12T14:31:47Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This is a place to add your links to pages you've created. We'll organize as we go...<br /> * [[Mission Statement]]<br /> * [[Editing Guidelines]]<br /> * [[Definitions of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Article Summaries]]<br /> * [[Authors]]<br /> * [[Geographical Map of Authors]]<br /> * [[Theories and Movements]]<br /> * [[Timeline]]<br /> * [[Glossary]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-27T22:32:18Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> <br /> == Websites ==<br /> * [http://rhetoric.eserver.org/ Rhetoric and Composition]<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> * [http://www.stc.org/ Society for Technical Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> * [http://mason.gmu.edu/~bhawk/journals/links.html CompPile: Journals in Rhetoric and Composition]<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-27T22:30:11Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> <br /> == Websites ==<br /> * [http://rhetoric.eserver.org/ Rhetoric and Composition]<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> * [http://www.stc.org/ Society for Technical Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> *<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rhetoric_and_Literature 2011-04-27T01:59:41Z

<p>Juliette: Created page with &quot;This page will be dedicated to the research, arguments, etc. of the constant debate between rhetoric and literature.&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>This page will be dedicated to the research, arguments, etc. of the constant debate between rhetoric and literature.</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Directory 2011-04-27T01:58:57Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This is a place to add your links to pages you've created. We'll organize as we go...<br /> <br /> * [[Mission Statement]]<br /> * [[Editing Guidelines]]<br /> * [[Glossary]]<br /> * [[Definitions of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Theories and Movements]]<br /> * [[Authors]]<br /> * [[Article Summaries]]<br /> * [[Timeline]]<br /> * [[Geographical Map of Articles]]<br /> * [[Rhetoric and Literature]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Directory 2011-04-26T03:55:34Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This is a place to add your links to pages you've created. We'll organize as we go...<br /> <br /> * [[Mission Statement]]<br /> * [[Editing Guidelines]]<br /> * [[Glossary]]<br /> * [[Definitions of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Theories and Movements]]<br /> * [[Authors]]<br /> * [[Article Summaries]]<br /> * [[Timeline]]<br /> * [[Geographical Map of Articles]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Directory 2011-04-26T03:55:04Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This is a place to add your links to pages you've created. We'll organize as we go...<br /> <br /> * [[Editing Guidelines]]<br /> * [[Mission Statement]]<br /> * [[Glossary]]<br /> * [[Definitions of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Theories and Movements]]<br /> * [[Authors]]<br /> * [[Article Summaries]]<br /> * [[Timeline]]<br /> * [[Geographical Map of Articles]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-26T03:49:43Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> * [http://www.stc.org/ Society for Technical Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> *<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-26T03:49:14Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> * [http://www.stc.org/ Society for Technical Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> *<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-26T03:48:59Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> * [http://www.stc.org/ Society for Technical Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> *<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-26T03:47:58Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students enrolled in ENGW 4341. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> * [http://www.stc.org/ Society for Technical Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> *<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Resources 2011-04-26T03:46:24Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page is a place to post helpful resources for students enrolled in ENGW 4341. As you find interesting websites, academic databases, videos, etc., add them to this page. If your resource doesn't fit into one of the preexisting categories, feel free to create a new category.<br /> <br /> == On-Campus Resources ==<br /> * [http://libr.stedwards.edu/ Library]<br /> * [http://www.stedwards.edu/writing/index.html Writing Center]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Scholarly Journals ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/journals/ce College English]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://computersandcomposition.osu.edu/ Computers and Composition]<br /> * [http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ Computers and Composition Online]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10572252.asp Technical Communication Quarterly]<br /> * [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/ Kairos]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/rsq Rhetoric Society Quarterly]<br /> * [http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/RQJS Quarterly Journal of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Professional Organizations ==<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/Home_Page Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/ National Council of Teachers of English]<br /> * [http://www.attw.org/ Association of Teachers of Technical Writing]<br /> * [http://wpacouncil.org/ Council of Writing Program Administrators]<br /> * [http://www.businesscommunication.org/ Association for Business Communication]<br /> <br /> == Conferences ==<br /> * [http://www.ncte.org/cccc Conference on College Composition and Communication]<br /> * [http://www.associationdatabase.com/aws/RSA/pt/sp/conferences Rhetoric Society of America]<br /> * [http://louisville.edu/conference/watson Watson]<br /> * [http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/english/TILTS/TILTS.php TILTS]<br /> *<br /> <br /> == Blogs ==<br /> * [http://www.stephenfry.com/ The New Adventures of Stephen Fry]<br /> * [http://illinois.edu/db/view/25 The Web of Language by Dennis Baron]<br /> * [http://www.figarospeech.com/ It Figures - Figures of Speech]<br /> <br /> == Listservs ==<br /> *<br /> *</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Definitions_of_Rhetoric 2011-04-26T03:19:17Z

<p>Juliette: /* References */</p> <hr /> <div>This page will have definitions of rhetoric according to authors from our past and current theories courses. Authors are listed alphabetically by last name.<br /> <br /> '''Bizzell, Patricia'''<br /> <br /> * &quot;Rhetoric is the study of the personal, social and historical elements in human discourse--how to recognize them, interpret them, and act on them, in terms both of situational context and of verbal style.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Bryant, Donald C.''' <br /> * &quot;I take rhetoric to be the ''rationale of informative and suasory discourse''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;Rhetoric, or the rhetorical, is the function in human affairs which governs and gives direction to that creative activity, that process of critical analysis, that branch of learning, which address themselves to the whole phenomenom of the designed use of language for the promulgation of information, ideas, and attitudes.&quot;<br /> *&quot;We may say that the rhetorical function is the ''function of adjusting ideas to people and of people to ideas''.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Burke, Kenneth'''<br /> * &quot;The key term for the 'new' rhetoric would be 'identification.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Ehninger, Douglas'''<br /> * &quot;A rhetoric I define as an organized, consistent, coherent way of talking about practical discourse in any of its forms or modes.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Fogarty, Daniel'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the science of recognizing the range of the meanings and of the functions of words, and the art of using and interpreting them in accordance with this recognition.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Frye, Northrop'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the social aspect of the use of language.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Halloran, Michael S.'''<br /> * &quot;The tradition of classical rhetoric, then, is defined principally by the image of the Orator as a cultural idea. He appears in Greece as the man who possesses ''arete'', in Rome as 'the good man skilled in speaking,' later as The Renaissance Man, and later still as the Enlightenment's 'man of reason'.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Nichols, Marie Hochmuth'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the theory and the practice of the verbal mode of presenting judgment and choice, knowledge and feeling....It works in the area of the contingent, where alternatives are possible.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Perelman, Chaim'''<br /> * &quot;Classical Rhetoric, the art of speaking well--that is, the art of speaking (or writing) persuasively--was concerned to study the discursive ways of acting upon an audience, with a view to winning or increasing its adherence to the theses that were presented to it for its endorsement.&quot;<br /> * &quot;For the ancients, rhetoric was the theory of persuasive discourse and included five parts: ''inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria, and actio''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;The new rhetoric is a theory of argumentation....The part played by the audience in rhetoric is crucially important, because all argumentation, in aiming to persuade, must be adapted to the audience and, hence, based on beliefs accepted by the audience with such conviction that the rest of the discourse can be securely based upon it.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Richards, I.A.'''<br /> * Rhetoric &quot;should be a study of misunderstanding and its remedies,&quot; &quot;a persistent, systematic, detailed inquiry into how words work.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Weaver, Richard'''<br /> * Rhetoric is the &quot;intellectual love of the Good,&quot; and &quot;seeks to perfect men by showing them better versions of themselves.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> 1. Breuch, Lee-Ann M. Kastman. &quot;Post-Process 'Pedagogy'.&quot; ''Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader''. Ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 2003. 116. Print.<br /> <br /> 2. Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 271, 282. Print.<br /> <br /> 3. Ehninger, Douglas. &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 319. Print.<br /> <br /> 4. Fogarty, Daniel John. ''Roots for a New Rhetoric''. New York: Bureau of Publication; Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1959. Print.<br /> <br /> 5. Frye, Northrop. ''The Well-Tempered Critic''. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> <br /> 6. Halloran, S. Michael. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Eds. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 333. Print.<br /> <br /> 7. Nichols, Marie Hochmuth. ''Rhetoric and Criticism''. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> <br /> 8. Perelman, Chaim. &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 146, 153, 158. Print.<br /> <br /> 9. Perelman, Chaim. &quot;Rhetoric and Philosophy.&quot; ''Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention in Writing''. Eds. Richard E. Young and Yameng Liu. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1994. 51. Print.<br /> <br /> 10. Richards, I.A. ''The Philosophy of Rhetoric''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1936. Print.<br /> <br /> 11.) Weaver, Richard M. ''The Ethics of Rhetoric''. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953. Print.</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Definitions_of_Rhetoric 2011-04-26T03:17:37Z

<p>Juliette: /* References */</p> <hr /> <div>This page will have definitions of rhetoric according to authors from our past and current theories courses. Authors are listed alphabetically by last name.<br /> <br /> '''Bizzell, Patricia'''<br /> <br /> * &quot;Rhetoric is the study of the personal, social and historical elements in human discourse--how to recognize them, interpret them, and act on them, in terms both of situational context and of verbal style.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Bryant, Donald C.''' <br /> * &quot;I take rhetoric to be the ''rationale of informative and suasory discourse''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;Rhetoric, or the rhetorical, is the function in human affairs which governs and gives direction to that creative activity, that process of critical analysis, that branch of learning, which address themselves to the whole phenomenom of the designed use of language for the promulgation of information, ideas, and attitudes.&quot;<br /> *&quot;We may say that the rhetorical function is the ''function of adjusting ideas to people and of people to ideas''.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Burke, Kenneth'''<br /> * &quot;The key term for the 'new' rhetoric would be 'identification.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Ehninger, Douglas'''<br /> * &quot;A rhetoric I define as an organized, consistent, coherent way of talking about practical discourse in any of its forms or modes.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Fogarty, Daniel'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the science of recognizing the range of the meanings and of the functions of words, and the art of using and interpreting them in accordance with this recognition.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Frye, Northrop'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the social aspect of the use of language.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Halloran, Michael S.'''<br /> * &quot;The tradition of classical rhetoric, then, is defined principally by the image of the Orator as a cultural idea. He appears in Greece as the man who possesses ''arete'', in Rome as 'the good man skilled in speaking,' later as The Renaissance Man, and later still as the Enlightenment's 'man of reason'.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Nichols, Marie Hochmuth'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the theory and the practice of the verbal mode of presenting judgment and choice, knowledge and feeling....It works in the area of the contingent, where alternatives are possible.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Perelman, Chaim'''<br /> * &quot;Classical Rhetoric, the art of speaking well--that is, the art of speaking (or writing) persuasively--was concerned to study the discursive ways of acting upon an audience, with a view to winning or increasing its adherence to the theses that were presented to it for its endorsement.&quot;<br /> * &quot;For the ancients, rhetoric was the theory of persuasive discourse and included five parts: ''inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria, and actio''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;The new rhetoric is a theory of argumentation....The part played by the audience in rhetoric is crucially important, because all argumentation, in aiming to persuade, must be adapted to the audience and, hence, based on beliefs accepted by the audience with such conviction that the rest of the discourse can be securely based upon it.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Richards, I.A.'''<br /> * Rhetoric &quot;should be a study of misunderstanding and its remedies,&quot; &quot;a persistent, systematic, detailed inquiry into how words work.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Weaver, Richard'''<br /> * Rhetoric is the &quot;intellectual love of the Good,&quot; and &quot;seeks to perfect men by showing them better versions of themselves.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> 1. Breuch, Lee-Ann M. Kastman. &quot;Post-Process 'Pedagogy'.&quot; ''Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader''. Ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 2003. 116. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt; 2. Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 271, 282. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;3. Ehninger, Douglas. &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 319. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;4. Fogarty, Daniel John. ''Roots for a New Rhetoric''. New York: Bureau of Publication; Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1959. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;5. Frye, Northrop. ''The Well-Tempered Critic''. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;6. Halloran, S. Michael. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Eds. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 333. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;7. Nichols, Marie Hochmuth. ''Rhetoric and Criticism''. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;8. Perelman, Chaim. &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 146, 153, 158. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;9. Perelman, Chaim. &quot;Rhetoric and Philosophy.&quot; ''Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention in Writing''. Eds. Richard E. Young and Yameng Liu. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1994. 51. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;10. Richards, I.A. ''The Philosophy of Rhetoric''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1936. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;11.) Weaver, Richard M. ''The Ethics of Rhetoric''. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953. Print.</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Definitions_of_Rhetoric 2011-04-26T03:16:57Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page will have definitions of rhetoric according to authors from our past and current theories courses. Authors are listed alphabetically by last name.<br /> <br /> '''Bizzell, Patricia'''<br /> <br /> * &quot;Rhetoric is the study of the personal, social and historical elements in human discourse--how to recognize them, interpret them, and act on them, in terms both of situational context and of verbal style.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Bryant, Donald C.''' <br /> * &quot;I take rhetoric to be the ''rationale of informative and suasory discourse''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;Rhetoric, or the rhetorical, is the function in human affairs which governs and gives direction to that creative activity, that process of critical analysis, that branch of learning, which address themselves to the whole phenomenom of the designed use of language for the promulgation of information, ideas, and attitudes.&quot;<br /> *&quot;We may say that the rhetorical function is the ''function of adjusting ideas to people and of people to ideas''.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Burke, Kenneth'''<br /> * &quot;The key term for the 'new' rhetoric would be 'identification.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Ehninger, Douglas'''<br /> * &quot;A rhetoric I define as an organized, consistent, coherent way of talking about practical discourse in any of its forms or modes.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Fogarty, Daniel'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the science of recognizing the range of the meanings and of the functions of words, and the art of using and interpreting them in accordance with this recognition.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Frye, Northrop'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the social aspect of the use of language.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Halloran, Michael S.'''<br /> * &quot;The tradition of classical rhetoric, then, is defined principally by the image of the Orator as a cultural idea. He appears in Greece as the man who possesses ''arete'', in Rome as 'the good man skilled in speaking,' later as The Renaissance Man, and later still as the Enlightenment's 'man of reason'.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Nichols, Marie Hochmuth'''<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the theory and the practice of the verbal mode of presenting judgment and choice, knowledge and feeling....It works in the area of the contingent, where alternatives are possible.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Perelman, Chaim'''<br /> * &quot;Classical Rhetoric, the art of speaking well--that is, the art of speaking (or writing) persuasively--was concerned to study the discursive ways of acting upon an audience, with a view to winning or increasing its adherence to the theses that were presented to it for its endorsement.&quot;<br /> * &quot;For the ancients, rhetoric was the theory of persuasive discourse and included five parts: ''inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria, and actio''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;The new rhetoric is a theory of argumentation....The part played by the audience in rhetoric is crucially important, because all argumentation, in aiming to persuade, must be adapted to the audience and, hence, based on beliefs accepted by the audience with such conviction that the rest of the discourse can be securely based upon it.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Richards, I.A.'''<br /> * Rhetoric &quot;should be a study of misunderstanding and its remedies,&quot; &quot;a persistent, systematic, detailed inquiry into how words work.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Weaver, Richard'''<br /> * Rhetoric is the &quot;intellectual love of the Good,&quot; and &quot;seeks to perfect men by showing them better versions of themselves.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> 1. Breuch, Lee-Ann M. Kastman. &quot;Post-Process 'Pedagogy'.&quot; ''Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader''. Ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 2003. 116. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt; 2. Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 271, 282. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;3. Ehninger, Douglas. &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 319. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;4. Fogarty, Daniel John. ''Roots for a New Rhetoric''. New York: Bureau of Publication; Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1959. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;5. Frye, Northrop. ''The Well-Tempered Critic''. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;6. Halloran, S. Michael. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Eds. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 333. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;7. Nichols, Marie Hochmuth. ''Rhetoric and Criticism''. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;8. Perelman, Chaim. &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 146, 153, 158. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;9. Perelman, Chaim. &quot;Rhetoric and Philosophy.&quot; ''Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention in Writing''. Eds. Richard E. Young and Yameng Liu. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1994. 51. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;10. Richards, I.A. ''The Philosophy of Rhetoric''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1936. Print.<br /> &lt;br&gt;11.) Weaver, Richard M. ''The Ethics of Rhetoric''. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953. Print.</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Definitions_of_Rhetoric 2011-04-26T03:03:43Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page will have definitions of rhetoric according to authors from our past and current theories courses. Authors are listed alphabetically by last name.<br /> <br /> '''Bizzell, Patricia''': <br /> * &quot;Rhetoric is the study of the personal, social and historical elements in human discourse--how to recognize them, interpret them, and act on them, in terms both of situational context and of verbal style.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Bryant, Donald C.''': <br /> * &quot;I take rhetoric to be the ''rationale of informative and suasory discourse''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;Rhetoric, or the rhetorical, is the function in human affairs which governs and gives direction to that creative activity, that process of critical analysis, that branch of learning, which address themselves to the whole phenomenom of the designed use of language for the promulgation of information, ideas, and attitudes.&quot;<br /> *&quot;We may say that the rhetorical function is the ''function of adjusting ideas to people and of people to ideas''.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Burke, Kenneth''':<br /> * &quot;The key term for the 'new' rhetoric would be 'identification.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Ehninger, Douglas''':<br /> * &quot;A rhetoric I define as an organized, consistent, coherent way of talking about practical discourse in any of its forms or modes.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Fogarty, Daniel''':<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the science of recognizing the range of the meanings and of the functions of words, and the art of using and interpreting them in accordance with this recognition.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Frye, Northrop''':<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the social aspect of the use of language.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Halloran, Michael S.''':<br /> * &quot;The tradition of classical rhetoric, then, is defined principally by the image of the Orator as a cultural idea. He appears in Greece as the man who possesses ''arete'', in Rome as 'the good man skilled in speaking,' later as The Renaissance Man, and later still as the Enlightenment's 'man of reason'.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Nichols, Marie Hochmuth''':<br /> * Rhetoric is &quot;the theory and the practice of the verbal mode of presenting judgment and choice, knowledge and feeling....It works in the area of the contingent, where alternatives are possible.&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Perelman, Chaim''':<br /> * &quot;Classical Rhetoric, the art of speaking well--that is, the art of speaking (or writing) persuasively--was concerned to study the discursive ways of acting upon an audience, with a view to winning or increasing its adherence to the theses that were presented to it for its endorsement.&quot;<br /> * &quot;For the ancients, rhetoric was the theory of persuasive discourse and included five parts: ''inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria, and actio''.&quot;<br /> * &quot;The new rhetoric is a theory of argumentation....The part played by the audience in rhetoric is crucially important, because all argumentation, in aiming to persuade, must be adapted to the audience and, hence, based on beliefs accepted by the audience with such conviction that the rest of the discourse can be securely based upon it.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Richards, I.A.''':<br /> * Rhetoric &quot;should be a study of misunderstanding and its remedies,&quot; &quot;a persistent, systematic, detailed inquiry into how words work.&quot; <br /> <br /> '''Weaver, Richard''':<br /> * Rhetoric is the &quot;intellectual love of the Good,&quot; and &quot;seeks to perfect men by showing them better versions of themselves.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> *Breuch, Lee-Ann M. Kastman. &quot;Post-Process 'Pedagogy'.&quot; ''Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader''. Ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 2003. 116. Print.<br /> *Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 271, 282. Print.<br /> *Ehninger, Douglas. &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 319. Print.<br /> *Fogarty, Daniel John. ''Roots for a New Rhetoric''. New York: Bureau of Publication; Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1959. Print.<br /> *Frye, Northrop. ''The Well-Tempered Critic''. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> *Halloran, S. Michael. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Eds. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 333. Print.<br /> *Nichols, Marie Hochmuth. ''Rhetoric and Criticism''. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> *Perelman, Chaim. &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 146, 153, 158. Print.<br /> *Perelman, Chaim. &quot;Rhetoric and Philosophy.&quot; ''Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention in Writing''. Eds. Richard E. Young and Yameng Liu. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1994. 51. Print.<br /> *Richards, I.A. ''The Philosophy of Rhetoric''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1936. Print.<br /> *Weaver, Richard M. ''The Ethics of Rhetoric''. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953. Print.</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Definitions_of_Rhetoric 2011-04-26T03:00:52Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>This page will have definitions of rhetoric according to authors from our past and current theories courses. The authors are listed alphabetically by last name.<br /> <br /> '''Bizzell, Patricia''': &lt;br&gt;* &quot;Rhetoric is the study of the personal, social and historical elements in human discourse--how to recognize them, interpret them, and act on them, in terms both of situational context and of verbal style.&quot;&lt;br&gt; <br /> <br /> '''Bryant, Donald C.''': &lt;br&gt;* &quot;I take rhetoric to be the ''rationale of informative and suasory discourse''.&quot;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;* &quot;Rhetoric, or the rhetorical, is the function in human affairs which governs and gives direction to that creative activity, that process of critical analysis, that branch of learning, which address themselves to the whole phenomenom of the designed use of language for the promulgation of information, ideas, and attitudes.&quot;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;We may say that the rhetorical function is the ''function of adjusting ideas to people and of people to ideas''.&quot;&lt;br&gt; <br /> <br /> '''Burke, Kenneth''':&lt;br&gt;* &quot;The key term for the 'new' rhetoric would be 'identification.&quot;&lt;br&gt;<br /> <br /> '''Ehninger, Douglas''':&lt;br&gt;* &quot;A rhetoric I define as an organized, consistent, coherent way of talking about practical discourse in any of its forms or modes.&quot;&lt;br&gt; <br /> <br /> '''Fogarty, Daniel''':&lt;br&gt;* Rhetoric is &quot;the science of recognizing the range of the meanings and of the functions of words, and the art of using and interpreting them in accordance with this recognition.&quot;&lt;br&gt;<br /> <br /> '''Frye, Northrop''':&lt;br&gt;* Rhetoric is &quot;the social aspect of the use of language.&quot;&lt;br&gt;<br /> <br /> '''Halloran, Michael S.''':&lt;br&gt;* &quot;The tradition of classical rhetoric, then, is defined principally by the image of the Orator as a cultural idea. He appears in Greece as the man who possesses ''arete'', in Rome as 'the good man skilled in speaking,' later as The Renaissance Man, and later still as the Enlightenment's 'man of reason'.&quot;&lt;br&gt; <br /> <br /> '''Nichols, Marie Hochmuth''':&lt;br&gt;* Rhetoric is &quot;the theory and the practice of the verbal mode of presenting judgment and choice, knowledge and feeling....It works in the area of the contingent, where alternatives are possible.&quot;&lt;br&gt;<br /> <br /> '''Perelman, Chaim''':&lt;br&gt;* &quot;Classical Rhetoric, the art of speaking well--that is, the art of speaking (or writing) persuasively--was concerned to study the discursive ways of acting upon an audience, with a view to winning or increasing its adherence to the theses that were presented to it for its endorsement.&quot;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;* &quot;For the ancients, rhetoric was the theory of persuasive discourse and included five parts: ''inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria, and actio''.&quot;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;* &quot;The new rhetoric is a theory of argumentation....The part played by the audience in rhetoric is crucially important, because all argumentation, in aiming to persuade, must be adapted to the audience and, hence, based on beliefs accepted by the audience with such conviction that the rest of the discourse can be securely based upon it.&quot;&lt;br&gt; <br /> <br /> '''Richards, I.A.''':&lt;br&gt;* Rhetoric &quot;should be a study of misunderstanding and its remedies,&quot; &quot;a persistent, systematic, detailed inquiry into how words work.&quot;&lt;br&gt; <br /> <br /> '''Weaver, Richard''':&lt;br&gt;* Rhetoric is the &quot;intellectual love of the Good,&quot; and &quot;seeks to perfect men by showing them better versions of themselves.&quot;&lt;br&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> *Breuch, Lee-Ann M. Kastman. &quot;Post-Process 'Pedagogy'.&quot; ''Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader''. Ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 2003. 116. Print.<br /> *Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 271, 282. Print.<br /> *Ehninger, Douglas. &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 319. Print.<br /> *Fogarty, Daniel John. ''Roots for a New Rhetoric''. New York: Bureau of Publication; Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1959. Print.<br /> *Frye, Northrop. ''The Well-Tempered Critic''. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> *Halloran, S. Michael. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Eds. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 333. Print.<br /> *Nichols, Marie Hochmuth. ''Rhetoric and Criticism''. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1963. Print.<br /> *Perelman, Chaim. &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.&quot; ''Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook''. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Boston, MA: Blair Press, 1994. 146, 153, 158. Print.<br /> *Perelman, Chaim. &quot;Rhetoric and Philosophy.&quot; ''Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention in Writing''. Eds. Richard E. Young and Yameng Liu. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1994. 51. Print.<br /> *Richards, I.A. ''The Philosophy of Rhetoric''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1936. Print.<br /> *Weaver, Richard M. ''The Ethics of Rhetoric''. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1953. Print.</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bakhtin,_Mikhail_%22Toward_a_Methodology_for_the_Human_Sciences%22 2011-04-26T02:26:33Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] was a great influence on [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], author of the article “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Here Bakhtin outlies a variety of theories that aid understanding in the non-exact human sciences. For one, he contrasts the idea of a subject (or personality) with a thing, saying that understanding of a subject must be dialogic, i.e., based on contextual meaning (unlike the monological dialectic of the natural sciences). Through dialogic contact, one’s own words and another’s words join to form a personality, which requires a semantic context. Bakhtin also discusses reification (becoming a thing) and personification (becoming a personality), saying neither can be reached in full.<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Some of Bakhtin's other main ideas include the following:'''<br /> <br /> * The author-creator can never be created in the sphere he creates; the author cannot become an image because he is the creator of every image.<br /> <br /> * You understand texts because you are able to relate them to other texts, which creates a dialogue in your mind between the texts that you are correlating together.<br /> <br /> * Text lives only by coming into contact with other texts; this contact creates a dialogue; this dialogue (if the voices are erased) can get rid of the deep-seeded contextual meanings.<br /> <br /> * Extratextual influences are important at the beginning stages of someone’s life; ‘other’ words (words from other people) are processed with our own words to create a dialogue within ourselves.<br /> <br /> * The thing remains a thing and the word, a word; they are only changed by contextual meaning.<br /> <br /> * According to contemporary literary scholars, the listener/reader is immanent in the work; they understand and know all; they are the ideal listener.<br /> <br /> * According to an opposing viewpoint, the listener is a mirror image of the author; there is no interaction between the author and the listener.<br /> <br /> * The printed or spoken text is not equal to the work as a whole; the work as a whole include the extratextual elements (context/situation). <br /> <br /> <br /> For more information please visit: [[Mikhail Bakhtin]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bakhtin,_Mikhail_%22Toward_a_Methodology_for_the_Human_Sciences%22 2011-04-25T22:54:55Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] was a great influence on [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], author of the article “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Here Bakhtin outlies a variety of theories that aid understanding in the non-exact human sciences. For one, he contrasts the idea of a subject (or personality) with a thing, saying that understanding of a subject must be dialogic, i.e., based on contextual meaning (unlike the monological dialectic of the natural sciences). Through dialogic contact, one’s own words and another’s words join to form a personality, which requires a semantic context. Bakhtin also discusses reification (becoming a thing) and personification (becoming a personality), saying neither can be reached in full.<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Some of Bakhtin's other main ideas include the following:'''<br /> <br /> * The author-creator can never be created in the sphere he creates; the author cannot become an image because he is the creator of every image.<br /> <br /> * You understand texts because you are able to relate them to other texts, which creates a dialogue in your mind between the texts that you are correlating together.<br /> <br /> * Text lives only by coming into contact with other texts; this contact creates a dialogue; this dialogue (if the voices are erased) can get rid of the deep-seeded contextual meanings.<br /> <br /> * Extratextual influences are important at the beginning stages of someone’s life; ‘other’ words (words from other people) are processed with our own words to create a dialogue within ourselves.<br /> <br /> * The thing remains a thing and the word, a word; they are only changed by contextual meaning.<br /> <br /> * According to contemporary literary scholars, the listener/reader is immanent in the work; they understand and know all; they are the ideal listener.<br /> <br /> * According to an opposing viewpoint, the listener is a mirror image of the author; there is no interaction between the author and the listener.<br /> <br /> * The printed or spoken text is not equal to the work as a whole; the work as a whole include the extratextual elements (context/situation). <br /> <br /> <br /> For biographical information please visit: [[Mikhail Bakhtin]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bakhtin,_Mikhail_%22Toward_a_Methodology_for_the_Human_Sciences%22 2011-04-25T22:54:41Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] was a great influence on [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], author of the article “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Here Bakhtin outlies a variety of theories that aid understanding in the non-exact human sciences. For one, he contrasts the idea of a subject (or personality) with a thing, saying that understanding of a subject must be dialogic, i.e., based on contextual meaning (unlike the monological dialectic of the natural sciences). Through dialogic contact, one’s own words and another’s words join to form a personality, which requires a semantic context. Bakhtin also discusses reification (becoming a thing) and personification (becoming a personality), saying neither can be reached in full.<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Some of Bakhtin's other main ideas include the following:'''<br /> <br /> * The author-creator can never be created in the sphere he creates; the author cannot become an image because he is the creator of every image.<br /> <br /> * You understand texts because you are able to relate them to other texts, which creates a dialogue in your mind between the texts that you are correlating together.<br /> <br /> * Text lives only by coming into contact with other texts; this contact creates a dialogue; this dialogue (if the voices are erased) can get rid of the deep-seeded contextual meanings.<br /> <br /> * Extratextual influences are important at the beginning stages of someone’s life; ‘other’ words (words from other people) are processed with our own words to create a dialogue within ourselves.<br /> <br /> * The thing remains a thing and the word, a word; they are only changed by contextual meaning.<br /> <br /> * According to contemporary literary scholars, the listener/reader is immanent in the work; they understand and know all; they are the ideal listener.<br /> <br /> * According to an opposing viewpoint, the listener is a mirror image of the author; there is no interaction between the author and the listener.<br /> <br /> * The printed or spoken text is not equal to the work as a whole; the work as a whole include the extratextual elements (context/situation). <br /> <br /> <br /> For biographical information please visit:[[Mikhail Bakhtin]]</div>

Juliette https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bakhtin,_Mikhail_%22Toward_a_Methodology_for_the_Human_Sciences%22 2011-04-25T22:53:47Z

<p>Juliette: </p> <hr /> <div>[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] was a great influence on [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], author of the article “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Here Bakhtin outlies a variety of theories that aid understanding in the non-exact human sciences. For one, he contrasts the idea of a subject (or personality) with a thing, saying that understanding of a subject must be dialogic, i.e., based on contextual meaning (unlike the monological dialectic of the natural sciences). Through dialogic contact, one’s own words and another’s words join to form a personality, which requires a semantic context. Bakhtin also discusses reification (becoming a thing) and personification (becoming a personality), saying neither can be reached in full.<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Some of Bakhtin's other main ideas include the following:'''<br /> <br /> * The author-creator can never be created in the sphere he creates; the author cannot become an image because he is the creator of every image.<br /> <br /> * You understand texts because you are able to relate them to other texts, which creates a dialogue in your mind between the texts that you are correlating together.<br /> <br /> * Text lives only by coming into contact with other texts; this contact creates a dialogue; this dialogue (if the voices are erased) can get rid of the deep-seeded contextual meanings.<br /> <br /> * Extratextual influences are important at the beginning stages of someone’s life; ‘other’ words (words from other people) are processed with our own words to create a dialogue within ourselves.<br /> <br /> * The thing remains a thing and the word, a word; they are only changed by contextual meaning.<br /> <br /> * According to contemporary literary scholars, the listener/reader is immanent in the work; they understand and know all; they are the ideal listener.<br /> <br /> * According to an opposing viewpoint, the listener is a mirror image of the author; there is no interaction between the author and the listener.<br /> <br /> * The printed or spoken text is not equal to the work as a whole; the work as a whole include the extratextual elements (context/situation). <br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]]</div>

Juliette