<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://rhetorclick.com/skins/common/feed.css?270"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=Katie+T.&amp;title=Special%3AContributions</id>
		<title>RhetorClick - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://rhetorclick.com/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=Katie+T.&amp;title=Special%3AContributions"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Katie+T."/>
		<updated>2026-04-19T20:49:02Z</updated>
		<subtitle>From RhetorClick</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.16.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T.</id>
		<title>User:Katie T.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T."/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:57:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm an ENGW major (professional writing track) at St. Edward's University planning to graduate in August and digital fellow at a global communications consulting firm. In my spare time, I'm also an amateur blogger, Twitter addict, and advocate for all sorts of politically conservative causes that make most of my fellow classmates unhappy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributions:&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited glossary entries, including streamlined formatting, correcting grammatical and factual errors, correcting order, and fleshing out very basic definitions&lt;br /&gt;
* Restructured the glossary to shrink the Contents box and match the [[Authors]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Replaced/removed broken links in glossary entries; ensured consistency in links (e.g., whereas original links varied, every term from the Weaver article now links to [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]] rather than [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Added glossary entries: architectonic, casuistry, dialogism, endoxa, etymology, historicity, langue, modal qualifiers, monologism, monotonic reasoning, non-monotonic reasoning, parole, replicability, warrant, validity&lt;br /&gt;
* Removed unnecessary glossary entries based more on vocabulary than rhetorical terminology: ambiguity, disparagement, derided, extrinsic, imbued, iteration, object, scavenge, subverter&lt;br /&gt;
* Added a list of glossary terms to each article page linked (while not a perfect or particularly elegant system, I think it's a good first step to making the glossary a two-way resource - both from the glossary to the articles and vice versa)&lt;br /&gt;
* Added content to [[Rebecca Rickly]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Created a page for [[semanticism]]; added it to the [[Theories and Movements]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:50:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal units''': physical communication such as gestures and facial expressions or characteristics of speech such as volume, pitch, and speed (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extremely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rickly,_Rebecca_%22Messy_Contexts:_Research_as_a_Rhetorical_Situation%22</id>
		<title>Rickly, Rebecca &quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rickly,_Rebecca_%22Messy_Contexts:_Research_as_a_Rhetorical_Situation%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:46:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This piece aims to educate graduate students and professors on the importance of rhetorically applying research methods to better teach, conduct and critique research in the digital age (377). Rickly claims that digital research is &amp;quot;messy.&amp;quot; Especially when studying language, which changes over time and varies by culture, results depend both on the subject and time of research. She explains that research can be made slightly less messy by ensuring the two prongs of &amp;quot;legitimate&amp;quot; research are satisfied: validity (the relevance of collected data to the premise of a study) and replicability (the ability of other researchers to conduct the same study and yield the same or similar results).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly also delves into the specific  complexities of research and the teaching of research and the vitality of metaphors in understanding (382). Rickly claims metaphors can be problematic and enlightening (384). Ricky then says the methods used to study technology do not exist in a vacuum (385). Researchers should also be educated on the relationship between method, methodology, and epistemology (394-395).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ricky concludes with claiming that we should approach research rhetorically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: replicability, validity&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Fisher,_Walter_%22Narration_as_a_Human_Communication_Paradigm%22</id>
		<title>Fisher, Walter &quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Fisher,_Walter_%22Narration_as_a_Human_Communication_Paradigm%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:45:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In this article, Fisher presents the idea of creating a narrative paradigm to use in the study of rhetoric. This paradigm, he says, would be used in situations where the Rational World Paradigm is not useful. According to Fisher, human communication should be viewed historically, as well as situationally. The narrative paradigm works on the claim that all human experiences and communication is part of a narrative, and that without said narrative, nothing can ever be fully understood. Fisher seems to agree with other rhetors we have read and believes that much of rhetoric in the rational world paradigm gets reduced to shouting over other people’s statements, and trying to prove one right answer. The narrative paradigm would seek to expand the definition of “good reasons” and “good arguments,” and teach people that public moral arguments should be more about discussing and debating which “story” is a better fit; in other words, to promote understanding and open-mindedness instead of forcing people to believe in one correct answer.--[[User:Amber B.|Amber B.]] 10:00, 3 April 2012 (PDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: narrative paradigm&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Slatin,_John_M._%22Reading_Hypertext:_Order_and_Coherence_in_a_New_Medium%22</id>
		<title>Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Slatin,_John_M._%22Reading_Hypertext:_Order_and_Coherence_in_a_New_Medium%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:45:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In his article ''Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium'', [[John M. Slatin]] asserts that hypertext can only exist online and it needs to take the computer into consideration as a new medium of communication. The fact that hypertext only exists in an online environment is the biggest difference between hypertext and traditional text. By communicating through a computer, one must realize that documents now have multiple points of entry, as opposed to a book, which has only one point of entry that makes sense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Slatin, &amp;quot;one of the chief functions of rhetoric in the hypertext environment is to discover the principles of effective communication and then develop ways of implementing those principles through the available technology.&amp;quot; There is a whole different assumption about readers and reading hypertext than traditional text. Reading hypertext is non-linear, meaning that readers will enter a text at any point at will and exit a text as abruptly as they entered it. It is very difficult to understand and predict how a reader will read a hyper-document. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slatin defines three different types of hyper-document readers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reader as browser- One who wanders aimlessly through an area. The browser reads for pleasure as opposed to reading for a specific purpose. The browser might not read through all the available material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reader as user- This reader has a clear and limited purpose when reading through material. These readers enter the hyper-document in the looks of something specific and once they finds the material they are looking for, they leave. Slatin says that this user resembles a typical student doing an assigned reading for a course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Reader as co-author- Reader either adds additional information to an existing document or creates a new document that is available for others to review and change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slatin notes that a reader will eventually be all three types of readers at some point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The greatest value of hypertext is the ability to link enormous quantities of material that would normally be separate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: hypertext, node&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Sidler,_Michelle_%22Playing_Scavenger_and_Gazer_with_Scientific_Discourse:_Opportunities_and_Ethics_for_Online_Research%22</id>
		<title>Sidler, Michelle &quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Sidler,_Michelle_%22Playing_Scavenger_and_Gazer_with_Scientific_Discourse:_Opportunities_and_Ethics_for_Online_Research%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:44:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Article Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Online vs. Print'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Print documents must undergo a publication process and therefore becomes “historical record” in comparison to web “documents” which are living and immediate.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Websites are valuable artifacts, though they have not undergone any academic evaluation.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;As a research scavenger, numerous texts and sources of data are available immediately online.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;'''Scavenge:''' “plucking discourse of many types from multiple sources, both historical and (near) real-time” (75).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Personal vs. Private'''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Legal and ethical risks&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;“Such engagement requires an adventuresome, nomadic spirit and willingness to situate ethics in discrete contexts for particular places and times, constantly scavenging for new ethical models and socially responsible methodologies” (84).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;'''Gaze:''' to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: gaze&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide Digital Divide]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bakhtin,_Mikhail_%22Toward_a_Methodology_for_the_Human_Sciences%22</id>
		<title>Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bakhtin,_Mikhail_%22Toward_a_Methodology_for_the_Human_Sciences%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:44:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] was a great influence on [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], author of the article “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Here Bakhtin outlies a variety of theories that aid understanding in the non-exact human sciences. For one, he contrasts the idea of a subject (or personality) with a thing, saying that understanding of a subject must be dialogic, i.e., based on contextual meaning (unlike the monological dialectic of the natural sciences). Through dialogic contact, one’s own words and another’s words join to form a personality, which requires a semantic context. Bakhtin also discusses reification (becoming a thing) and personification (becoming a personality), saying neither can be reached in full.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some of Bakhtin's other main ideas include the following:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The author-creator can never be created in the sphere he creates; the author cannot become an image because he is the creator of every image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You understand texts because you are able to relate them to other texts, which creates a dialogue in your mind between the texts that you are correlating together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Text lives only by coming into contact with other texts; this contact creates a dialogue; this dialogue (if the voices are erased) can get rid of the deep-seeded contextual meanings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Extratextual influences are important at the beginning stages of someone’s life; ‘other’ words (words from other people) are processed with our own words to create a dialogue within ourselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The thing remains a thing and the word, a word; they are only changed by contextual meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to contemporary literary scholars, the listener/reader is immanent in the work; they understand and know all; they are the ideal listener.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to an opposing viewpoint, the listener is a mirror image of the author; there is no interaction between the author and the listener.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The printed or spoken text is not equal to the work as a whole; the work as a whole include the extratextual elements (context/situation). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please visit: [[Mikhail Bakhtin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: dialogism, isomorphous, monologism, natura naturans, natura naturata, semantic&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Barthes,_Roland_%22Death_of_the_Author%22</id>
		<title>Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Barthes,_Roland_%22Death_of_the_Author%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:43:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;“Death of the Author” by [[Roland Barthes]] discusses and criticizes the emphasis literary critics place on the author while offering an alternative emphasis. The article cites those who have tried to break with traditional criticism practices, such as Mallarme’s attempt to suppress the author in poetics and Valery’s stress on linguistics and the text. Barthes proposes that criticism placing the author at the center of originality and creation are false because words and concepts are inherited, and thus unable to be created by the individual; instead, the author only exerts power in organization.  The words and concepts used by humanity exist in culturally specific dictionaries, which he describes as a “tissue of signs imitation that is lost, infinitely deferred.” For Barthes, “A text is not a line of words releasing a single ‘theological’ meaning (the ‘message’ of the Author-God), but a multi-dimensional space in which a variety of writings, none of them original, blend and clash” (5). Ultimately, Barthes claims the author's identity limits text and its potential interpretations. Instead, the reader should be seen as the sole agent in interpretation since only he can aline the words on the page with his own understanding of reality. Barthes boldly states, “the birth of the reader must be at the cost of the death of the Author.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: Death of the Author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Barthes Roland Barthes Wikipedia]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:38:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* M-P */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal units''': physical communication such as gestures and facial expressions or characteristics of speech such as volume, pitch, and speed (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Blythe,_Stuart_%22Coding_Digital_Texts_and_Multimedia%22</id>
		<title>Blythe, Stuart &quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Blythe,_Stuart_%22Coding_Digital_Texts_and_Multimedia%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:36:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In his article, Blythe discusses why he believes coding to be an important device when analyzing digital texts. He breaks his argument up into two main sections: “Methods” and “Methodology.”  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first section, Blythe breaks down the coding procedure step-by-step, beginning with how to choose your artifacts and finishing with how to analyze your results. Blythe explains the steps of coding in a sequential order: &lt;br /&gt;
* defining sets&lt;br /&gt;
* selecting samples&lt;br /&gt;
* defining a unit of analysis such as words, T-units, exchanges, and rhetorical units, or non-verbal cues such as facial expressions and intonation&lt;br /&gt;
* creating a set of codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He explains that, “Essentially, analysis involves finding patterns and interesting anomalies in the coded data. To some extent, analysis may be an intuitive process based upon a researcher’s ability to find interesting trends in the data” (220).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blythe discusses in depth the difference between manifest content, which obviously belongs to one category or another, and latent content, which is less clearly defined and could be interpreted in a variety of ways. He suggests several methods, such as scanning data before coding begins to identify latent content, to make sure coding of latent content stays consistent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the methodology section of his article, Blythe addresses arguments against coding and provides rebuttals. The main argument he addresses is that the individual often gets lost in data coding, where the focus is on the “big picture” (226). He discusses the ethics of critical research as it can be tied to data coding and suggests that researchers should always remember they are studying communication by human beings, not faceless research subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blythe states in his conclusion, “The key to data coding, then, is knowing what it will reveal and conceal, and to combine it with other methods in order to create a more complete picture” (226).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: comprehensive sampling, convenience sampling, criterion sampling, data coding, evidentials, latent content, manifest content, method, methodology, nonverbal units, random sampling, rhetorical units, T-units, verbal units&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Toulmin,_Stephen_%22The_Layout_of_Arguments%22</id>
		<title>Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Toulmin,_Stephen_%22The_Layout_of_Arguments%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:28:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In “The Layout of Arguments,” [[Stephen Toulmin]]’s thesis is that a new framework is needed for argumentation, as an alternative to the syllogism. The framework (or layout) he proposes involves five main components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Toulmin.jpeg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A '''claim'''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Data''' supporting the claim and from which the claim can be inferred&lt;br /&gt;
* A '''warrant''', an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data&lt;br /&gt;
** A warrant is often supported by a '''backer,''' a fact or set of facts that support the warrant&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Qualifications''', conditions under which there may be exceptions to the claim&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rebuttal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toulmin's argument is particularly unique because of its attention to the warrant, which is often taken for granted. Toulmin criticizes the syllogism because universal premises such as “All men are mortal” do not properly distinguish between warrant and backing. Additionally, with a syllogism one cannot always tell whether a universal premise is true only in theory or in existential, empirical fact. Toulmin explains that logicians have too long relied on the syllogism and that in doing so they have forced arguments into a mold that doesn’t take into account subtle distinctions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toulmin identifies three types or warrants: authoritative (based on ethos), motivational (based on pathos), and substantive (based on logos).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: backing, casuistry, modal qualifiers, monotonic reasoning, non-monotonic reasoning, warrant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It is at this physiological level that the idea of logical form has been introduced, and here that the validity of our arguments has ultimately to be established or refuted&amp;quot; (105).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The existence of considerations such as would establish the acceptability of the most reliable warrants is something we are entitled to take for granted&amp;quot; (115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;No entirely general answer can be given to the question, for what determines whether there are or are not existential implications in any particular case is not the form of statement itself, but rather the practical use to which this form is put on that occasion&amp;quot; (123).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If we are to set our arguments out with complete logical candor, and understand properly the nature of the 'the logical process,' surely we shall need to emply a pattern of argument no less sophisticated than is required by law&amp;quot; (107). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Even the most general warrants in ethical arguments are yet liable in unusual situations to suffer exceptions, and so at strongest can authorize only presumptive conclusions&amp;quot; (125).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Weaver,_Richard_%22The_Cultural_Role_of_Rhetoric</id>
		<title>Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Weaver,_Richard_%22The_Cultural_Role_of_Rhetoric"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:27:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by [[Richard Weaver]] argues his point that a combination of rhetoric and dialectic are needed to form the most persuasive speech. However, at the time the article was written, Weaver claimed that the “discourse that is favored today is without feeling and resonance.&amp;quot; In other words, people were incorrectly relying on dialectic without rhetoric. Rhetoric relies on a shared history between people that brings them together. Weaver states that his thesis “is that a too exclusive reliance upon dialectic is a mistake of the most serious consequence because dialectic alone in the social realm is subversive.&amp;quot; He believes that the danger of dialectic comes from its denial of historicity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rhetoric is the combination of passion and logic with a emphasis on human history. To emphasize this point he references a great historical event: the example of the trial of Socrates. He uses the trial to show that using just a dialectic approach will not connect with the people a person is appealing to in their speech. Socrates may have been the “greatest dialectician of his time”, but the way in which he spoke lacked feeling and brought “to minds of the audience the side of Socrates which had aroused enmity.&amp;quot; His way of speaking did not connect with the audience and therefore they felt no sympathy or connection with him. People need to be “approached through certain ‘places’ or common perceptions of reality.&amp;quot; Those who only use dialectic actually withdraw themselves from society. However, there are people now who believe that “it is improper for any person to try to persuade another person” and that the only speech stated should be pure facts. It is impossible to simply use the denotation and not the connotation of a word, though, and “what a word means is going to be determined by the whole context of the vocabulary.&amp;quot; According to Weaver, rhetoric and not dialectic is what helped Christianity to thrive over Hellenic ideals because it provided talk of feelings and a historical moment as well. Weaver concludes by saying that “in the restored man dialectic and rhetoric will go along hand in hand as the regime of the human faculties intended that they should do&amp;quot; (89).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: axiological, chariot allegory, fallacious, historicity, nominalism, spatiotemporal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Richard Weaver]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Conservatism Conservatism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_M._Weaver Richard M. Weaver Wikipedia]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Hea,_Amy_C._Kimme_%22Riding_The_Wave%22</id>
		<title>Hea, Amy C. Kimme &quot;Riding The Wave&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Hea,_Amy_C._Kimme_%22Riding_The_Wave%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:27:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Article Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Two ways technology is defined:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;a.	the substantive view, where technology is constructed as inevitably good or bad, and technological progress is seen as inherently either helping humankind achieve its potential or enslaving us in a dehumanized culture&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;b.	the instrumental view, in which technology is neutral; that is, technology is merely a tool unaffected by its own social and historical context (272).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Web is a constructed space with a range of ideologies, differences, and politics at play (274).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;'''Articulation:''' a connection or linking of parts to form a unity (273).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;'''Articulation theory:''' is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies (274).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: articulation, Articulation Theory&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/McKeon,_Richard_%E2%80%9CThe_Uses_of_Rhetoric_in_a_Technological_Age:_Architectonic_Productive_Arts%E2%80%9D</id>
		<title>McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/McKeon,_Richard_%E2%80%9CThe_Uses_of_Rhetoric_in_a_Technological_Age:_Architectonic_Productive_Arts%E2%80%9D"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:26:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his article, McKeon discusses the importance of creating a new rhetoric that acts as a productive architectonic art rather than a subordinate art.  He says, “If rhetoric is to be used to contribute to the formation of the culture of the modern world, it should function productively in the resolution of new problems and architectonically in the formation of new inclusive communities” (127).  McKeon argued that in order to deal with the changes in an age of technology, we must develop a new rhetoric that is productive in solving problems and communicating solutions.  He states, “[the new rhetoric] should be adapted to [man’s] individual development and to their contribution to forming a common field in which the subject of inquiry is not how to devise means to achieve accepted end arranged in hierarchies but the calculation of uses and applications that might be made of the vastly increased available means in order to devise new ends and to eliminate oppositions and segregations based on past competitions for scarce means” (144).  He believes that in this technological era, rhetoric must bridge the gap between logos and techne (135) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://home.uchicago.edu/~ahkissel/mckeon/mckeon.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Product ==&lt;br /&gt;
McKeon identifies rhetoric as an architectonic art: “an art of structuring all principles and products of knowing, doing and making” (127). McKeon’s idea of modern rhetoric is productive, one capable of contributing to modern culture by addressing problems and fostering community. The author is concerned with a rhetoric that is both structured and capable of creating structure. Though the author has identified rhetoric as architectonic, he has also identified the need for a new architectonic productive art (rhetoric). The new art should be universal, and he calls for a logos of techne, or theory applied. While theory and practice have historically been separated, McKeon seeks to unify these two under the umbrella of the architectonic productive art. This is all to say that McKeon’s hope for an architectonic productive art is a hope for social change. The last paragraph of this essay (as it seems is the case with most of these essays on rhetorical theory) is a glimmer of hope for the future of rhetoric. “in a technological age all men should have an art of creativity, of judgment, of disposition, and of organization” (144). This art should, as McKeon says, be used for both the individual and community to achieve new ends and “eliminate oppositions and segregations based on past competitions for scarce means” (144).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible Implications ==&lt;br /&gt;
While ending opposition and segregation is rather a lofty goal for the use of rhetoric, I think it is indicative of a kind of shift toward morals and ethics within rhetoric. McKeon is concerned with the application of rhetoric to not only organize and create but also to solve social issues. He is trying to remove rhetoric from it’s long history of being associated with persuasion, manipulation, and malicious intentions. McKeon’s rhetoric is bigger than language or a communication--it is social change. The one thing I feel McKeon’s essay lacked was stating exactly who is responsible for identifying social ills and implementing the new architectonic productive art to solve these problems. Are rhetoricians, by name, now to be social advocates? Is that our responsibility as a people capable of using language to identify problems and prescribe solutions? Is it selfish of us to only use rhetoric to further our own ideas and agendas? Though I don’t think all rhetoricians should be (our could be) social advocates, I do think it is important for us to use our skills for something bigger and better than ourselves or our studies. I am extremely grateful to have an education that marries both writing and rhetoric, and I feel capable of using that rhetorical skill for work that might affect social change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: architectonic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Foucault,_Michel_%22What_Is_an_Author%3F%22</id>
		<title>Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Foucault,_Michel_%22What_Is_an_Author%3F%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:25:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In “What is an Author,” [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Michel_Foucault Michel Foulcault] works to correct a pivotal aspect he had excluded, and received criticism for, in his previous writings--the role or non-existent role of the author. He limits his discussion to “the singular relationship that holds between an author and a text” while mentioning the themes of writing’s exterior position and the relationship of writing and death. Foucault also brings up the question of, what constitutes the work of an author and what is everything he/she wrote? This has kept us from fully understanding the disappearance of the author. As has the notion of [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Glossary#E ecriture] in which the idea of the signal, human author becomes a “transcendental anonymity” (182). Foucault then discusses the name of an author and its function. He concludes that the name of an author is not a proper name that does not modify despite changes in the characteristic of the named individual, but rather a name that is linked to the discourse of the author. Thus, the author’s name is functional, and its function is to “characterize the existence, circulation, and operation of certain discourses within a society” (184). Having an author as a function and speaking purely of texts with authors, the “author-function” has four features: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First, “Objects of appropriation”: the author function has to be a set property distinguished as such by some legal governance.&lt;br /&gt;
*Second, “Not universal or constant in all discourse”: the author function is not constant in all discourse because, throughout time, the value placed on naming an author has varied for different purposes, e.g., folk inherent truth and cherished wisdom, honed throughout the ages, would be negated with a known writer or author. (in contrast, authors of math have to be stated as they are indicative of time period and context)&lt;br /&gt;
*Third, “Not formed spontaneously through the simple attribution of a discourse to an individual”: the author function is not simply formed by relating a text to an individual, just like in the Saussure reading: that there has been no recorded period in which the image and the concept were simply put together. By following Foucault’s criteria for assessing what should be in an author’s “work,” we can sufficiently “recover” the relationship of the “author-function.”&lt;br /&gt;
*Fourth, “Arises our of their scission--in the division and distance of the two” (184-188): this is the division and distance of the three egos that an author depicts in his/her writings. The author function does not simply refer to one individual because it has three separate ego’s, that of the goals of the work after it once immediately finished and potentially future questions to apply to the work, the one amidst creating it, and the unique individual who at a time and place succeeded in the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After stating the four features of the &amp;quot;author function&amp;quot;, he then makes the depiction between scientific writings and those of “initiators of discursive practices” (189). The difference being that these initiators of discursive practices “produced not only their own work, but the possibility and the rules of formation of other texts,” and that they can be returned to as opposed to rediscovered or reactivated. Foucault defines how “the initiators of discourse practices” are exemplified foremost with Marx and Freud because their theories can be built upon. However, the initiation of a discourse is not like scientific or mathematical theory because it is entirely separate from future developments of it; they are separate because they have an intended omission that makes the initiation impossible to return to. We can only return to theorize what the omission actually is, and through this impossibility to truly know what was omitted are the initiators forever discursive. Thus, this omission constantly initiates future discursive practices but the original initiation can never be corrected or fixed because it was an intentional omission that others can only guess upon what it's meaning was for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: aphorism, canonical, deictic, ecriture, exegesis, homonymy, rediscovering&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Saussure,_Ferdinand_de_%22Nature_of_the_Linguistic_Sign%22</id>
		<title>Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Saussure,_Ferdinand_de_%22Nature_of_the_Linguistic_Sign%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:24:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In “Nature of the Linguistic Sign,” [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] argues that a linguistic sign can be broken up into two parts: a concept (signified) and a sound-image (signifier). He points out how the sign is arbitrary and not based on an inherent relationship between the signified and signifier. He says the sign is both immutable—no one in a community can alter the language at will—and mutable—given enough time, social forces will cause shifts in language, though language is always inherited from the preceding period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nature of the Linguistic Sign==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saussure argues that the field of linguistics should be divided into two branches: synchronic and diachronic. He forms this belief by reasoning that symbolic language essentially consists of the signifier and the signified which, together, are the sign. The signifier is the sound-image (the verbally or internally spoken word) and it exists only in time because it belongs to the realm of thought. The signified, on the other hand, is the concept referred to by the sound-image being called to mind. The signified, then, as a “thing” that “is” exists regardless of time because it does not need to be spoken or visualized in order to exist. It continues existing whether it is being referred to or not. This is where Saussure’s concept of continuity enters into the study. The signified is continuous in that it does not change, while the signifier is continuous in that it does change over time. Saussure also refers to this as immutability (signs are abitrary and so they do not change) and mutability (the relationship between the signified and the signifier does shift over time - page ten).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another way that Saussure describes the time-conscious and the time-less aspects of rhetoric is to name them, respectively, parole and langue. Parole  is specifically the use of language. Langue refers specifically to the underlying structures of a language. Synchronic linguistics (the study of linguistics ignorant of time) deals with langue, while diachronic linguistics (the study of linguistics in light of time) deals with parole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Saussure also distinguishes between the old way of analyzing language, which involved “naming” objects or concepts and did not differentiate between the nature of the name and the nature of the thing being named, and his new way of analyzing language, which is to consider both parole and langue, and not just parole. Saussure argues that there is a difference between the two and that acknowledging this difference matters to the field of linguistics because structure is responsible for meaning. Though the relationship between the signifier and signified may change, it will always fit into the preexisting structure of language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible Implications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could the ideas in Saussure’s “Nature of the Linguistic Sign” be compared to to Plato’s forms? The forms and the signifed are both the unchanging, eternal essence of a thing. Is it valid to claim similarities between Saussure and Plato in that they both look for the foundational structures that are behind everything?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Plato was the first structuralist. He believed in “is” and that the world was highly organized according to structures, whether they be societal hierarchies or predetermined essences, everything that exists, to Plato, fits in with the laws of the universe. It could be argued that Saussure arrived at a similar philosophical conclusion and applied it to the study of language (which, by this time, many argue to be the definition of reality, so in a way, Saussure is not narrowing Plato’s philosophy, only qualifying it). This philosophy, known as structuralism, can be described as follows: people are not of themselves, and they do not generate original meaning and reality and symbols of themselves, but people and meaning and reality and symbols are produced out of structures. The structures are original, that which comes from them is not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: antithetical, diachronic, Esperanto, langue, orthographic, parole, phoneme, priori, semiology, signified, signifier, synchronic&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Ede,_Lisa_S._and_Andrea_A._Lunsford_%22On_Distinctions_between_Classical_and_Modern_Rhetoric%22</id>
		<title>Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Ede,_Lisa_S._and_Andrea_A._Lunsford_%22On_Distinctions_between_Classical_and_Modern_Rhetoric%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:22:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
Abstract taken from the Education Resources Information Center:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emergence of a modern or &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; rhetoric has been characterized by its attempt both to recover and reexamine the concepts of classical rhetoric and to define itself against that classical tradition. The distinctions that are persistently drawn between classical and modern rhetoric fall under four related heads: images of man and society, logical argument, speaker-audience relationship, and persuasion versus communication. The first two distinctions, which view the classical image of man as a rational being and the logical proofs as supreme, discount classical rhetoric as too rationalistic. The latter two, which present the speaker-audience relationship in classical rhetoric as antagonistic and unidirectional and its goal as persuasion, discount classical rhetoric as being too dependent upon emotional manipulation and coercion. These distinctions reflect two major problems: (1) a failure to relate [[Aristotle's &amp;quot;Rhetoric&amp;quot;]] to the rest of his philosophy, and (2) serious, persistent misunderstandings about the nature and function of the &amp;quot;pisteis&amp;quot; and of the &amp;quot;enthymeme&amp;quot; in Aristotelian rhetoric (For &amp;quot;pisteis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;enthymeme&amp;quot; see [[Glossary]]).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A much more accurate way to describe Aristotle's concept of the goal of rhetoric is as an interactive means of discovering meaning through language. Such an approach demands that rhetoric be reinstated at the center of the curriculum, as the art of using language in the creation--and sharing--of knowledge and belief. One way to begin this task is by eschewing the false distinctions that have been drawn between classical and modern rhetoric and by building instead on their powerful similarities. (HOD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: aleatoric, animism, antistrophos, compendia, dialectic, dispositio, enthymeme, episteme, ethos, inventio, logos, organon, paradeigma, pathos, pejorative, pisteis, poeis, syllogism, techne&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lisa S. Ede]] &amp;amp; [[Andrea A. Lunsford]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Aristotle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED220866&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:19:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* E-H */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:17:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* A-D */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Moeller,_Ryan_and_David_Christensen_%22System_Mapping:_A_Genre_Field_Analysis_of_the_National_Science_Foundation%27s_Grant_Proposal_and_Funding_Process%22</id>
		<title>Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Moeller,_Ryan_and_David_Christensen_%22System_Mapping:_A_Genre_Field_Analysis_of_the_National_Science_Foundation%27s_Grant_Proposal_and_Funding_Process%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:11:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process,&amp;quot; Ryan Moeller and David Christensen take readers through the process of applying for a grant using the National Science Foundation's website. Moeller and Christensen set out specific rules for applying for a grant. These rules are usually not the rules described online. Through this article, Moeller and Christensen are trying to decipher the complicated process that is grant writing. They introduce genre theory, play theory, and the agents involved in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, Moeller and Christensen determine that to write a successful grant, a grant writer must develop a relationship with the foundation they're interested in. The more contact and communication a grant writer has with the foundation the more likely they are to have their project funded. They also determined through their research that collaboration with other organizations is a major selling point to funders. In the end, the program officers play a major role in determining if your project will be funded, so communication is key.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: agency, genre, genre agents, genre field, play theory, player agents&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Richards,_I.A._%22How_to_Read_a_Page%22</id>
		<title>Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Richards,_I.A._%22How_to_Read_a_Page%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:11:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In “How to Read a Page,” [[I. A. Richards]] writes at length about ideal strategies for interacting with and making meaning out of texts. He explains the difficulties involved in varying interpretations and outlines some common words that are important, but ambiguous. He then illustrates the complexities involved in reading a page by providing an example: a somewhat abstruse passage written by Aristotle. Richards rewrites this passage in plain English and highlights various distinctions he makes in his rewritten version. His analysis leads him to make the following conclusions about reading pages: it helps to read text keeping in mind vocal emphases to better discern structure (reading aloud), to read slowly and deliberately, and to read with an eye for comparison between meanings—or “translation” in the sense of figuring out the context in which different words are used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the glossary: affective fallacy, close reading, intentional fallacy, New Criticism&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Perelman,_Cha%C3%AFm_%22The_New_Rhetoric:_A_Theory_of_Practical_Reasoning%22</id>
		<title>Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Perelman,_Cha%C3%AFm_%22The_New_Rhetoric:_A_Theory_of_Practical_Reasoning%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:10:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; [[Chaim Perelman]] starts his essay by explaining the fall out of classical rhetoric and how  current rhetoric is different from the definitions it used to have. He doesn’t disavow the idea of classical rhetoric completely, though; he gives examples showing that classical rhetoric was practical, rather than just empty style. Perelman tells how he discovered what he calls new rhetoric by studying how people make value judgments (connects with dialectical reasoning). Since the new rhetoric is “a theory of argumentation,” it is important to understand what differentiates argumentation from simply demonstrating (153). A demonstration is based off of rules and guidelines that were previously created. In demonstration, the orator/rhetor does not try to persuade or compel his or her audience. Argumentation, however, has the purpose of moving the audience, persuading the audience, communicating with the audience, and getting the audience to listen (154-55). All argumentation, therefore, must be made to be effective to its audience. This is where new rhetoric differentiates from classical rhetoric. New rhetoric “has a wider scope as nonformal reasoning that aims at obtaining or reinforcing the adherence of an audience” (155).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After learning what new rhetoric is, Perelman teaches us how it works. There are the uses of facts, truths, presumptions, values, hierarchies, and loci of the preferable. Facts and truths are universally agreed upon; the orator does not need to spend his or her time trying to get the audience to believe these facts/truths. Values play the role of moving the audience, influencing their decisions. Perelman mentions that values that may seem universal are really not. He argues there is just a desire for an universal agreement. In any situation, the orator must “know the opinion of [his or her] audience,” so he or she can answer any questions asked (159). The orator must have prepared his argument with relevant information both to the audience and the subject. They must also know what they considered a strong/weak argument, what type of argument his audience will care for (listen to), and what type of argument his audience won’t care about (159). The orator must choose an effective argument and structure it so his or her audience comes to his or her desired conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perelman talks about Quasi Logical arguments that use an artificial language so “one sign can have only one meaning” (162). There are also arguments that appeal to the real, meaning they are based on reality’s structure. Arguments that attempt to establish the real are arguments trying to generate a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perelman also discusses how to deal with dissociation. According to him, philosophers use dissociation to move the audience from common sense into a “vision of reality” that doesn’t have conflict of opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: aesthetics, antilogy, apodictic philosophy, axiom, categorical imperative, classical rhetoric, dialectical reasoning, existentialism, exordium, forensic speaking, instrumental value judgment, intuitionism, logical empiricism, New Rhetoric, positivist, empiricism, proofs, rationalism, subjectivism, tautology&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Perelman,_Cha%C3%AFm_%22The_New_Rhetoric:_A_Theory_of_Practical_Reasoning%22</id>
		<title>Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Perelman,_Cha%C3%AFm_%22The_New_Rhetoric:_A_Theory_of_Practical_Reasoning%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:08:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; [[Chaim Perelman]] starts his essay by explaining the fall out of classical rhetoric and how  current rhetoric is different from the definitions it used to have. He doesn’t disavow the idea of classical rhetoric completely, though; he gives examples showing that classical rhetoric was practical, rather than just empty style. Perelman tells how he discovered what he calls new rhetoric by studying how people make value judgments (connects with dialectical reasoning). Since the new rhetoric is “a theory of argumentation,” it is important to understand what differentiates argumentation from simply demonstrating (153). A demonstration is based off of rules and guidelines that were previously created. In demonstration, the orator/rhetor does not try to persuade or compel his or her audience. Argumentation, however, has the purpose of moving the audience, persuading the audience, communicating with the audience, and getting the audience to listen (154-55). All argumentation, therefore, must be made to be effective to its audience. This is where new rhetoric differentiates from classical rhetoric. New rhetoric “has a wider scope as nonformal reasoning that aims at obtaining or reinforcing the adherence of an audience” (155).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After learning what new rhetoric is, Perelman teaches us how it works. There are the uses of facts, truths, presumptions, values, hierarchies, and loci of the preferable. Facts and truths are universally agreed upon; the orator does not need to spend his or her time trying to get the audience to believe these facts/truths. Values play the role of moving the audience, influencing their decisions. Perelman mentions that values that may seem universal are really not. He argues there is just a desire for an universal agreement. In any situation, the orator must “know the opinion of [his or her] audience,” so he or she can answer any questions asked (159). The orator must have prepared his argument with relevant information both to the audience and the subject. They must also know what they considered a strong/weak argument, what type of argument his audience will care for (listen to), and what type of argument his audience won’t care about (159). The orator must choose an effective argument and structure it so his or her audience comes to his or her desired conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perelman talks about Quasi Logical arguments that use an artificial language so “one sign can have only one meaning” (162). There are also arguments that appeal to the real, meaning they are based on reality’s structure. Arguments that attempt to establish the real are arguments trying to generate a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perelman also discusses how to deal with dissociation. According to him, philosophers use dissociation to move the audience from common sense into a “vision of reality” that doesn’t have conflict of opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: aesthetics, antilogy, apodictic philosophy, axiom, categorical imperative, classical rhetoric, dialectical reasoning, existentialism, exordium, forensic speaking, instrumental value judgment, intuitionism, logical empiricism, New Rhetoric, positivist, empiricism, proofs, rationalism, subjectivism, tautology&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:07:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[Perelman, Chaïm &amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Burke,_Kenneth_%22Definition_of_Man%22</id>
		<title>Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Burke,_Kenneth_%22Definition_of_Man%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:04:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In &amp;quot;Definition of Man,&amp;quot; Kenneth Burke outlines his philosophical exploration of the essence of man, or what makes us human and therefore fundamentally different from other animals. Although Burke concedes that humans might be classified as animals, he argues that our mode of being is distinct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I. Introduction''' &lt;br /&gt;
In Section I of his &amp;quot;Definition of Man,&amp;quot; Burke describes the relationship between definition and meaning. Definition, Burke believes, inspires meaning as it is &amp;quot;prior to the observations it summarizes&amp;quot; (Burke, 40). He notes that definition is essential and prior to discussion of any idea or object. In this sense, a definition exists “prior” to its attributes. This understanding of discussion provides the framework for the rest of Burke's essay, and emphasizes his belief in the power of language to shape reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''II “Symbol-Using Animal”'''&lt;br /&gt;
Burke begins section II with an anecdote about bird to illustrate the difference between man (a symbol-using animal) and animal (unable to use symbols). He uses the anecdote to illustrate how non symbol-using animals are limited in their transfer of ideas due to an inability to illustrate complex ideas through the use of symbols, as well as lack the attention necessary to complete the task. Burke notes, however, that while limited by this inability, birds are also freed from the constraints associated with living a reality constructed by and through symbols. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This illustration helps Burke segway into his discussion about how our realities are limited by the terministic screens we erect when we begin to name and define things. He believes that apart from personal experience, our conception of the world is simply a symbolic representation enabled by language. We use the symbol-sets to navigate &amp;quot;reality,&amp;quot; even as they screen us from the &amp;quot;non-verbal.&amp;quot; Words, he argues, are like a map which help guide us through life but say little about the true nature of their substance. Additionally, just as humans have control over the construct of words, words also have control over the construct of our being, causing us to view the world through prescribed lenses, or “ideologies.” Language itself can help us &amp;quot;find our way about,&amp;quot; while at the same time neglecting the inexpressible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideologies may function negatively, as in the examples he gives of brainwashing or hexing. Words and symbols can be so powerful that they may affect not only the way we perceive our physical reality, but also our very bodily functions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He concludes the first clause with a discussion of how substitution is inherent to symbolism, and how symbols are substitutes for often complex, detailed actions that cannot be illustrated by evoking the symbol alone. The symbol is a substitute, an abbreviation, for a specific and detailed object or action. In this way, the symbol becomes “transcendent,” as it leaves the realm of the physical, and enters into the realm of the psychological and theoretical. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''III. “Inventor of the Negative”''' &lt;br /&gt;
Burke begins the third clause of his argument with the observation that the “negative” is a human construct that does not exist in nature. A lamp is never “not a table,” or “not a child” - it can only possess its true nature, not the nature of things it is without. This differentiation is a human construction.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The negative is most often employed in regards to what Bergson, a quoted scholar, calls “unfulfilled expectations.” In other words, if we are expecting something to turn out a certain way, and it turns out differently than expected, we say it “did not happen.” Burke then argues that while we cannot have an idea of “nothing,” we can have an idea of “no,” which is why employing the negative is essential to our understanding of the world. In fact, he argues that the negative is so essential to our world that almost all seeming “positives” are in fact “quasi-positives,” or reactions to the negative - what things are “not” in society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word action (he differentiates this from the neutral “motion”) implies a choice, a response made to a “shalt not” or a “do not” negative imbued via life. He then raises the question of whether the positive or negative proceed the other, while acknowledging that by their very essence they imply the other - the positive cannot exist without the negative space, and vice versa. He argues that negativity proceeds positivity, because negativity is the predecessor of definition; before we deduct what something IS, we must figure out what it IS NOT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He ends this section by suggesting that exploration of the “do not’s” can be incredibly rewarding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''IV. “Man as a Tool-Using Animal”''' &lt;br /&gt;
In this clause, Burke acknowledges that since primitive times, humans have consistently been seeking ways to improve their existence outside the realm of the basic needs of food, shelter, sex. Tools and language, he notes, are intrinsically linked, as it would be impossible to use tools in a communal building session without the aid of language. Humans using tools and language represents our “second-level” nature - our ability to develop complex systems to improve our lives, and then develop words about words to demonstrate how to use those systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He concludes this clause with the argument that man as a symbol-using animal precludes man’s status as a tool-using animal, because in order to label man as a tool-using animal we must first find a definition for what man is, and what he is not. This is symbology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''V. “Goaded by the Spirit of Hierarchy”''' &lt;br /&gt;
This clause is fairly straightforward as it is built on the foundation of Burke’s previous clauses. Man, as defined by his nature of a symbol-using animal, conforms to the rules of hierarchy as created by negativity. Negativity defines what man “is not,” and he conforms to this position in both the physical (class, education, etc.) and spiritual (man as subordinate to God).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''VI. &amp;quot;Man is Guided by a Perfectionist Nature&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
Burke argues that man constantly aims towards a state of perfection, while acknowledging that philosophers such as Aristotle have recognized that by his very being, man is in a state of perfection, existing in this moment as it is meant to be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freud calls man’s fruitless hunt towards perfection a “destiny compulsion” - man becomes stuck in his compulsion to achieve success in an area that earlier proved a failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to being a philosophical exploration, Definition of Man serves as political and religious commentary. Burke’s assertion that humans are capable of higher thought and of contemplating the negative necessarily leads to religious questions. If humans are capable of higher thought, then what is higher thought, and where does it come from? And where does “nothing” come from? Burke argues that the existence of “yes” and “no,” of “something” and “nothing” make a strong argument for the existence of God and Devil. Definition of Man is political commentary in that Burke attempts to answer questions about why we make war. His short poem at the end and various comments throughout the essay demonstrate is disgust and awe at the possibility of nuclear war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In “Definition of Man,” [[Kenneth Burke]] takes a fairly dark view of human beings and their use of language. He defines man, using five clauses, as “Man is a symbol-using (symbol-making, symbol-misusing) animal/ inventor of the negative (or moralized by the negative)/ separated from his natural condition by instruments of his own making/ goaded by the spirit of hierarchy (or moved by the sense of order)/ and rotten with perfection” (53-54). At the beginning, Burke clearly states that his definition is subject to debate and modification. Burke asserts that our symbols-systems are what allow humans to survive and innovate; however, these same systems can also lead to destruction, thus introducing a duality of symbols or language, a main theme in this article. Continuing with the idea of duality, Burke introduces the clause regarding humans as the inventor of the negative, as he claims that nothing in nature is negative and that the negative was constructed by the symbol-systems. He continues to reference language used in the discussion of morality, i.e. the “Thou shall-not.” He believes in stating this negative phrase brings both positive and negative ideas. Then, Burke argues that our symbol-systems construct social networks and norms, etc., that separate us from our natural instincts; in other words, we regard natural occurrences or “things” as negative as a result of language. Furthermore, when he says “rotten with perfection,” Burke does not mean that humans are perfect. He means that humans strive to fulfill their perfect, already formulated ideas. This can lead to political scapegoating and a number of other sad occurrences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following key terms are defined in the [[Glossary]]: adumbration, ancillary, continuum, elocutio, entelechy, etymology, logology, parlance, perennial, promulgation, suasory, telos, tropism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related Articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]] Bryant attempts to add focus to Burke's broad definition of rhetoric.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T02:02:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* I-L */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:58:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* A-D */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:55:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* M-P */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': making known by open declaration; proclaiming formally or put into operation (as in a law, decree of a court, etc.) (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:53:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* A-D */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:51:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T.</id>
		<title>User:Katie T.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T."/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:51:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm an ENGW major (professional writing track) at St. Edward's University planning to graduate in August and digital fellow at a global communications consulting firm. In my spare time, I'm also an amateur blogger, Twitter addict, and advocate for all sorts of politically conservative causes that make most of my fellow classmates unhappy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributions:&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited glossary entries, including streamlined formatting, correcting grammatical and factual errors, correcting order, and fleshing out very basic definitions&lt;br /&gt;
* Restructured the glossary to shrink the Contents box and match the [[Authors]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Replaced/removed broken links in glossary entries - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Added glossary entries: architectonic, casuistry, dialogism, endoxa, etymology, historicity, langue, modal qualifiers, monologism, monotonic reasoning, non-monotonic reasoning, parole, replicability, warrant, validity&lt;br /&gt;
* Removed unnecessary glossary entries: ambiguity, disparagement, derided, imbued, iteration, object, scavenge, subverter&lt;br /&gt;
* Added content to [[Rebecca Rickly]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Created a page for [[semanticism]]; added it to the [[Theories and Movements]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Toulmin,_Stephen_%22The_Layout_of_Arguments%22</id>
		<title>Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Toulmin,_Stephen_%22The_Layout_of_Arguments%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:49:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In “The Layout of Arguments,” [[Stephen Toulmin]]’s thesis is that a new framework is needed for argumentation, as an alternative to the syllogism. The framework (or layout) he proposes involves five main components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Toulmin.jpeg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A '''claim'''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Data''' supporting the claim and from which the claim can be inferred&lt;br /&gt;
* A '''warrant''', an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data&lt;br /&gt;
** A warrant is often supported by a '''backer,''' a fact or set of facts that support the warrant&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Qualifications''', conditions under which there may be exceptions to the claim&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rebuttal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toulmin's argument is particularly unique because of its attention to the warrant, which is often taken for granted. Toulmin criticizes the syllogism because universal premises such as “All men are mortal” do not properly distinguish between warrant and backing. Additionally, with a syllogism one cannot always tell whether a universal premise is true only in theory or in existential, empirical fact. Toulmin explains that logicians have too long relied on the syllogism and that in doing so they have forced arguments into a mold that doesn’t take into account subtle distinctions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toulmin identifies three types or warrants: authoritative (based on ethos), motivational (based on pathos), and substantive (based on logos).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It is at this physiological level that the idea of logical form has been introduced, and here that the validity of our arguments has ultimately to be established or refuted&amp;quot; (105).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The existence of considerations such as would establish the acceptability of the most reliable warrants is something we are entitled to take for granted&amp;quot; (115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;No entirely general answer can be given to the question, for what determines whether there are or are not existential implications in any particular case is not the form of statement itself, but rather the practical use to which this form is put on that occasion&amp;quot; (123).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If we are to set our arguments out with complete logical candor, and understand properly the nature of the 'the logical process,' surely we shall need to emply a pattern of argument no less sophisticated than is required by law&amp;quot; (107). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Even the most general warrants in ethical arguments are yet liable in unusual situations to suffer exceptions, and so at strongest can authorize only presumptive conclusions&amp;quot; (125).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/File:Toulmin.jpeg</id>
		<title>File:Toulmin.jpeg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/File:Toulmin.jpeg"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:48:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: Diagram of the Toulmin method&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Diagram of the Toulmin method&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:43:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* A-D */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': the ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:37:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Architectonic''': productive, a mode of learning rather than merely observation (see [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information does not change the outcome (e.g., &amp;quot;Socrates has brown hair&amp;quot; does not change the outcome of the example syllogism &amp;quot;Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal&amp;quot;) (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Non-monotonic reasoning''': reasoning in which adding new information changes the outcome (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T01:25:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Casuistry''': the practice of applying general moral principles to specific cases; also known as case ethics (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuistry Casuistry])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialogic''': interpretation or understanding of a text based on an interpretation or understanding of other related texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge; &amp;quot;popular belief&amp;quot; (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': commonly held knowledge among a community and its leaders; a more reliable counterpart of doxa&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Historicity''': the shared historical foundation underlying cultures and texts (see [[Weaver, Richard &amp;quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Langue''': the underlying structures of a language, which are time-ignorant and related to synchronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''': terms such as &amp;quot;probably&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;presumably,&amp;quot; which indicate an author's level of certainty (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Monologism''': interpretation of a text without relation to other influencing texts (see [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parole''': the use of language, which is time-conscious and related to diachronic linguistics (see [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': the context of a rhetorical event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. Two leading views of the rhetorical situation exist today. One argues that a situation determines and brings about rhetoric, while the other proposes that rhetoric creates “situations” by making issues salient. (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_situation Rhetorical Situation Wikipedia])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''&amp;quot;Vir bonus dicendi peritus&amp;quot;''': &amp;quot;a good man speaking well&amp;quot;; Quintillian's definition of rhetoric as entwined with the author's moral character&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-17T00:40:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge, sometimes culturally based (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]], [[Plato]], [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism] , [[Aristotle]], )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kairos''': the oportune time and/or place; the right or appropriate time to say or do the right thing (see [http://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements#Sophism Sophism], [[Aristotle]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocrates Isocrates], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kairos Kairos]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(semiotics)#Triadic_signs Triadic signs])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical Situation''': (see [[Lloyd Bitzer]], [[Richard Vatz]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or non-clausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T.</id>
		<title>User:Katie T.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T."/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T20:23:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm an ENGW major (professional writing track) at St. Edward's University planning to graduate in August and digital fellow at a global communications consulting firm. In my spare time, I'm also an amateur blogger, Twitter addict, and advocate for all sorts of politically conservative causes that make most of my fellow classmates unhappy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributions:&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited glossary entries, including streamlined formatting, correcting grammatical and factual errors, and fleshing out very basic definitions&lt;br /&gt;
* Restructured the glossary to shrink the Contents box and match the [[Authors]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Replaced/removed broken links in glossary entries - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Added glossary entries: datum (IN PROGRESS), endoxa (IN PROGRESS), etymology, modal qualifiers (IN PROGRESS), replicability, warrant, validity&lt;br /&gt;
* Removed unnecessary glossary entries: ambiguity, disparagement, derided, imbued, iteration, object, scavenge, subverter&lt;br /&gt;
* Added content to [[Rebecca Rickly]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Created a page for [[semanticism]]; added it to the [[Theories and Movements]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T20:13:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge, sometimes culturally based (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (see [[Richards, I.A. &amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (see [[Slatin, John M. &amp;quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intelluctual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or nonclausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (see [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (see [[Burke, Kenneth &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:57:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* Q-T */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[&amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot; by I. A. Richards]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge, sometimes culturally based (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (Slatin [[March 22 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (Slatin [[March 22 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intelluctual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of diachronic (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or nonclausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (Bryant [[February 3 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:56:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* M-P */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[&amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot; by I. A. Richards]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge, sometimes culturally based (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (Slatin [[March 22 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (Slatin [[March 22 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling and that all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative&amp;quot;; contrast to the &amp;quot;Rational World Paradigm&amp;quot; (see [[Fisher, Walter &amp;quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intelluctual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of [[diachronic]] (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or nonclausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (Bryant [[February 3 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Toulmin,_Stephen_%22The_Layout_of_Arguments%22</id>
		<title>Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Toulmin,_Stephen_%22The_Layout_of_Arguments%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:52:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In “The Layout of Arguments,” [[Stephen Toulmin]]’s thesis is that a new framework is needed for argumentation, as an alternative to the syllogism. The framework (or layout) he proposes involves five main components:&lt;br /&gt;
* A '''claim'''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Data''' supporting the claim and from which the claim can be inferred&lt;br /&gt;
* A '''warrant''', an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data&lt;br /&gt;
** A warrant is often supported by a '''backer,''' a fact or set of facts that support the warrant&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Qualifications''', conditions under which there may be exceptions to the claim&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rebuttal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toulmin claims that the syllogism is too ambiguous because, for instance, universal premises (such as “All men are mortal”) do not properly distinguish between warrant and backing. Additionally, with a syllogism one cannot always tell whether a universal premise is true only in theory or in existential, empirical fact. Toulmin explains that logicians have too long relied on the syllogism and that in doing so they have forced arguments into a mold that doesn’t take into account subtle distinctions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It is at this physiological level that the idea of logical form has been introduced, and here that the validity of our arguments has ultimately to be established or refuted&amp;quot; (105).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The existence of considerations such as would establish the acceptability of the most reliable warrants is something we are entitled to take for granted&amp;quot; (115).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;No entirely general answer can be given to the question, for what determines whether there are or are not existential implications in any particular case is not the form of statement itself, but rather the practical use to which this form is put on that occasion&amp;quot; (123).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If we are to set our arguments out with complete logical candor, and understand properly the nature of the 'the logical process,' surely we shall need to emply a pattern of argument no less sophisticated than is required by law&amp;quot; (107). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Even the most general warrants in ethical arguments are yet liable in unusual situations to suffer exceptions, and so at strongest can authorize only presumptive conclusions&amp;quot; (125).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T.</id>
		<title>User:Katie T.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T."/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:50:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm an ENGW major (professional writing track) at St. Edward's University planning to graduate in August and digital fellow at a global communications consulting firm. In my spare time, I'm also an amateur blogger, Twitter addict, and advocate for all sorts of politically conservative causes that make most of my fellow classmates unhappy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributions:&lt;br /&gt;
* Created a page for [[semanticism]], added it to the [[Theories and Movements]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]] - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Added content to [[Rebecca Rickly]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited glossary entries, including streamlined formatting, correcting grammatical and factual errors, and fleshing out very basic definitions - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Restructured the glossary to shrink the Contents box and match the [[Authors]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Replaced/removed broken links in glossary entries - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Added glossary entries:&lt;br /&gt;
** Datum - IN PROGRESS &lt;br /&gt;
** Endoxa - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
** Etymology&lt;br /&gt;
** Modal qualifiers - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
** Replicability&lt;br /&gt;
** Warrant&lt;br /&gt;
** Validity&lt;br /&gt;
* Removed unnecessary glossary entries:&lt;br /&gt;
** Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;
** Disparagement&lt;br /&gt;
** Derided&lt;br /&gt;
** Imbued&lt;br /&gt;
** Iteration&lt;br /&gt;
** Object&lt;br /&gt;
** Scavenge&lt;br /&gt;
** Subverter&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rebecca_Rickly</id>
		<title>Rebecca Rickly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rebecca_Rickly"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:50:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* External Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Biography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rickly.jpg|thumb|alt=Rebecca Rickly|Rebecca Rickly, photo c/o TTU.edu]] Rebecca Rickly (date of birth unknown-present) is a professor in the Department of English at Texas Tech University. She has also taught at Ball State University, Ohio State University, and high schools in Ohio and California. Her courses typically focus on digital rhetoric, research, composition, and technical communication. Rickly describes herself as a &amp;quot;Techno-Rhetorician&amp;quot; whose interests include fields outside of rhetoric including pedagogy, technology, and gender studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly is an active member of the rhetoric and digital rhetoric communities, serving on the editorial boards of a number of scholarly journals, including ''Computers and Composition'', ''Kairos: A Journal for Teachers in Webbed Writing Environments'', and ''Online Writing Center Consortium''. She has presented several times at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, including most recently in 2011 with her presentation &amp;quot;Creating – and Sustaining – a Culture of Research by Re-Creating the Required Research Methods Course.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly lives with her partner and two children in Lubbock, Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article Summaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Books'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Performing Feminist Administration in Rhetoric and Composition Studies.'' 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Online Writing Classroom.'' 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Selected Articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Importance of Harmony: An Ecological Metaphor for Writing Research.&amp;quot; 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Distributed Learning, Distributed Teaching: Integrating Technology and Objective Assessment into First Year Composition.&amp;quot; 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multi-Vocal Textumentary.&amp;quot; 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Computer-Mediated Communication as Reflective Rhetoric-in-Action: Dialogic Interaction, Technology, and Cross-Curricular Thinking.&amp;quot; 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Making Rhetoric Viable/Making Rhetoric Visible In First Year Writing Courses.&amp;quot; 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wac.colostate.edu/aw/forums/spring2002 &amp;quot;Writing Centers and WAC.&amp;quot;] 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Way We Will Have Become: Future (Histories) of Computers and Writing.&amp;quot; 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Creating a Virtual Academic Community: Scholarship and Community in Wide Area Multiple-User Synchronous Discussions.&amp;quot; 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.1/tocnf.html &amp;quot;What Matters Who Writes? What Matters Who Responds?&amp;quot;] 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further Readings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.faculty.english.ttu.edu/rickly Rickly's website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.english.ttu.edu/general_info/directory/faculty_profile_pages/rickly_detailed.asp Rickly's TTU profile]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rebecca_Rickly</id>
		<title>Rebecca Rickly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rebecca_Rickly"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:49:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* Biography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Biography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rickly.jpg|thumb|alt=Rebecca Rickly|Rebecca Rickly, photo c/o TTU.edu]] Rebecca Rickly (date of birth unknown-present) is a professor in the Department of English at Texas Tech University. She has also taught at Ball State University, Ohio State University, and high schools in Ohio and California. Her courses typically focus on digital rhetoric, research, composition, and technical communication. Rickly describes herself as a &amp;quot;Techno-Rhetorician&amp;quot; whose interests include fields outside of rhetoric including pedagogy, technology, and gender studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly is an active member of the rhetoric and digital rhetoric communities, serving on the editorial boards of a number of scholarly journals, including ''Computers and Composition'', ''Kairos: A Journal for Teachers in Webbed Writing Environments'', and ''Online Writing Center Consortium''. She has presented several times at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, including most recently in 2011 with her presentation &amp;quot;Creating – and Sustaining – a Culture of Research by Re-Creating the Required Research Methods Course.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly lives with her partner and two children in Lubbock, Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article Summaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Books'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Performing Feminist Administration in Rhetoric and Composition Studies.'' 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Online Writing Classroom.'' 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Selected Articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Importance of Harmony: An Ecological Metaphor for Writing Research.&amp;quot; 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Distributed Learning, Distributed Teaching: Integrating Technology and Objective Assessment into First Year Composition.&amp;quot; 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multi-Vocal Textumentary.&amp;quot; 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Computer-Mediated Communication as Reflective Rhetoric-in-Action: Dialogic Interaction, Technology, and Cross-Curricular Thinking.&amp;quot; 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Making Rhetoric Viable/Making Rhetoric Visible In First Year Writing Courses.&amp;quot; 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wac.colostate.edu/aw/forums/spring2002 &amp;quot;Writing Centers and WAC.&amp;quot;] 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Way We Will Have Become: Future (Histories) of Computers and Writing.&amp;quot; 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Creating a Virtual Academic Community: Scholarship and Community in Wide Area Multiple-User Synchronous Discussions.&amp;quot; 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.1/tocnf.html &amp;quot;What Matters Who Writes? What Matters Who Responds?&amp;quot;] 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further Readings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.faculty.english.ttu.edu/rickly Rickly's website]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.english.ttu.edu/general_info/directory/faculty_profile_pages/rickly_detailed.asp Rickly's TTU profile]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rebecca_Rickly</id>
		<title>Rebecca Rickly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rebecca_Rickly"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:49:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Biography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rickly.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Rebecca Rickly|Rebecca Rickly, photo c/o TTU.edu]] Rebecca Rickly (date of birth unknown-present) is a professor in the Department of English at Texas Tech University. She has also taught at Ball State University, Ohio State University, and high schools in Ohio and California. Her courses typically focus on digital rhetoric, research, composition, and technical communication. Rickly describes herself as a &amp;quot;Techno-Rhetorician&amp;quot; whose interests include fields outside of rhetoric including pedagogy, technology, and gender studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly is an active member of the rhetoric and digital rhetoric communities, serving on the editorial boards of a number of scholarly journals, including ''Computers and Composition'', ''Kairos: A Journal for Teachers in Webbed Writing Environments'', and ''Online Writing Center Consortium''. She has presented several times at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, including most recently in 2011 with her presentation &amp;quot;Creating – and Sustaining – a Culture of Research by Re-Creating the Required Research Methods Course.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly lives with her partner and two children in Lubbock, Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article Summaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Books'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Performing Feminist Administration in Rhetoric and Composition Studies.'' 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Online Writing Classroom.'' 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Selected Articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Importance of Harmony: An Ecological Metaphor for Writing Research.&amp;quot; 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Distributed Learning, Distributed Teaching: Integrating Technology and Objective Assessment into First Year Composition.&amp;quot; 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multi-Vocal Textumentary.&amp;quot; 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Computer-Mediated Communication as Reflective Rhetoric-in-Action: Dialogic Interaction, Technology, and Cross-Curricular Thinking.&amp;quot; 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Making Rhetoric Viable/Making Rhetoric Visible In First Year Writing Courses.&amp;quot; 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wac.colostate.edu/aw/forums/spring2002 &amp;quot;Writing Centers and WAC.&amp;quot;] 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The Way We Will Have Become: Future (Histories) of Computers and Writing.&amp;quot; 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Creating a Virtual Academic Community: Scholarship and Community in Wide Area Multiple-User Synchronous Discussions.&amp;quot; 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.1/tocnf.html &amp;quot;What Matters Who Writes? What Matters Who Responds?&amp;quot;] 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further Readings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.faculty.english.ttu.edu/rickly Rickly's website]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.english.ttu.edu/general_info/directory/faculty_profile_pages/rickly_detailed.asp Rickly's TTU profile]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/File:Rickly.jpg</id>
		<title>File:Rickly.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/File:Rickly.jpg"/>
				<updated>2012-04-15T19:41:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: Rebecca Rickly

Photo courtesy of Texas Tech University http://www.english.ttu.edu/general_info/directory/faculty_profile_pages/rickly_detailed.asp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Rebecca Rickly&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo courtesy of Texas Tech University http://www.english.ttu.edu/general_info/directory/faculty_profile_pages/rickly_detailed.asp&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Style_Guide</id>
		<title>Style Guide</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Style_Guide"/>
				<updated>2012-04-14T22:17:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: /* Article Summaries */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Purpose of Style Guide==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This style guide will enable wiki contributors to keep a consistent voice, style, and design when adding or editing content. To make the wiki as effective as possible, it is important for both writing and design to remain consistent and accessible. Refer to the following guidelines for rules on grammar, punctuation, headings, form, and layout. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Style Guidelines ==  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When adding a new page, give a brief description (one or two sentences) of what information is found on that page immediately beneath the title. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When using Level 2 Headlines, put one line space between the title and the first line entry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For bulleted and numbered lists, put one space between the bullet point and the first word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For bulleted and numbered lists, put one line space between entries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For all headings (titles and level 2 headlines), use up-style. (Example: This Is How It Should Look / This is not how it should look)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the convention of Wikipedia, at the bottom of each page, put &amp;quot;See Also&amp;quot; for links to other pages within the wiki and &amp;quot;External Links&amp;quot; in level 2 headlines for useful links that are not easily integrated into the body of text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Writing Guidelines==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Follow the rules of American grammar and spelling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Follow MLA style when using citations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article Summaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Should be written in third person&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If using quotations, use footnotes to cite&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, use hyperlinks to link to an online source&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Divide the article summary into three sections: Abstract, Summary, and Possible Implications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The abstract should provide a succinct summary of the article, no more than 200 words long&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The article summary should provide a comprehensive overview of the article. If possible, include quotations (with citations). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Following the summary, the &amp;quot;Possible Implications&amp;quot; section is a space for a more subjective analysis of the article. While this should still be written in third person, feel free to propose alternative interpretations or links to outside sources that may be related to the article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* List article summaries in alphabetical order by author's last name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Title should be the article title (within quotation marks), followed by the author's full name. (Example: &amp;quot;Definition of Man&amp;quot; by Kenneth Burke)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Use a bold sub-heading (not a level 2 headline) for &amp;quot;Summary&amp;quot; section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Link to the author's page at the bottom of the entry using the following sentence: For more information, visit: [link to author's page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Include a section for &amp;quot;Possible Implications&amp;quot; after the summary so contributors can share their opinions about the readings. The section heading should look as follows: '''Additional Thoughts''' (Feel free to add your opinions here!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glossary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bold the word being defined, followed by a colon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If using a word/definition from an article, link to the article summary using a parenthetical reference after the definition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Example definition-- '''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Outside Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Author Pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* List authors in alphabetical order by Last Name. For links, write authors' names as Last Name, First Name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Title should be the author's full name (include middle initials, if commonly used).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat author's full name to start entry, followed by birth year and death year (if still living, write &amp;quot;present&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Link to Article Summaries by that author under an &amp;quot;Article Summaries&amp;quot; Level 2 Headline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Follow this general format for all Author Pages: summary, biography (including education, early life, family, occupations, awards, etc.), article summaries, additional works/ publications, further readings, references, and external links. Other sections can be added as desired (such as Notable Quotes). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definitions of Rhetoric ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* List authors alphabetically by last name. (Example: Burke, Kenneth)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Do not use Level 2 Headlines for authors' name -- make the names '''bold'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Use a bulleted list for definitions beneath author's name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Use a numbered list -- not a bulleted list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Timeline ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* List authors by First Name, Last Name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Link authors' names to their corresponding Authors Page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* List authors in order by birth date, from earliest to most current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Footnotes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://URL HERE.com] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*References (footnotes) &amp;lt;references/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*External links&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T.</id>
		<title>User:Katie T.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/User:Katie_T."/>
				<updated>2012-04-14T20:34:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm an ENGW major (professional writing track) at St. Edward's University planning to graduate in August and digital fellow at a global communications consulting firm. In my spare time, I'm also an amateur blogger, Twitter addict, and advocate for all sorts of politically conservative causes that make most of my fellow classmates unhappy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contributions:&lt;br /&gt;
* Created a page for [[semanticism]], added it to the [[Theories and Movements]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Created a page for [[Rebecca Rickly]] - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Bryant, Donald C. &amp;quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&amp;quot; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited/updated [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]] - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Edited glossary entries, including streamlined formatting, correcting grammatical and factual errors, and fleshing out very basic definitions - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Restructured the glossary to shrink the Contents box and match the [[Authors]] page&lt;br /&gt;
* Replaced/removed broken links in glossary entries - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
* Added glossary entries:&lt;br /&gt;
** Datum - IN PROGRESS &lt;br /&gt;
** Endoxa - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
** Etymology&lt;br /&gt;
** Modal qualifiers - IN PROGRESS&lt;br /&gt;
** Replicability&lt;br /&gt;
** Warrant&lt;br /&gt;
** Validity&lt;br /&gt;
* Removed unnecessary glossary entries:&lt;br /&gt;
** Ambiguity&lt;br /&gt;
** Disparagement&lt;br /&gt;
** Derided&lt;br /&gt;
** Imbued&lt;br /&gt;
** Iteration&lt;br /&gt;
** Object&lt;br /&gt;
** Scavenge&lt;br /&gt;
** Subverter&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rickly,_Rebecca_%22Messy_Contexts:_Research_as_a_Rhetorical_Situation%22</id>
		<title>Rickly, Rebecca &quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Rickly,_Rebecca_%22Messy_Contexts:_Research_as_a_Rhetorical_Situation%22"/>
				<updated>2012-04-14T20:34:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This piece aims to educate graduate students and professors on the importance of rhetorically applying research methods to better teach, conduct and critique research in the digital age (377). Rickly claims that digital research is &amp;quot;messy.&amp;quot; Especially when studying language, which changes over time and varies by culture, results depend both on the subject and time of research. She explains that research can be made slightly less messy by ensuring the two prongs of &amp;quot;legitimate&amp;quot; research are satisfied: validity (the relevance of collected data to the premise of a study) and replicability (the ability of other researchers to conduct the same study and yield the same or similar results).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rickly also delves into the specific  complexities of research and the teaching of research and the vitality of metaphors in understanding (382). Rickly claims metaphors can be problematic and enlightening (384). Ricky then says the methods used to study technology do not exist in a vacuum (385). Researchers should also be educated on the relationship between method, methodology, and epistemology (394-395).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ricky concludes with claiming that we should approach research rhetorically.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary</id>
		<title>Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Glossary"/>
				<updated>2012-04-14T20:30:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Katie T.: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== A-D ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adumbration:''' the act of providing vague advance indications of a concept to come; also known as &amp;quot;prefiguration&amp;quot; (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Affective fallacy''': coined by Wimsatt and Berdsley, the mistake of confusing a rhetorical artifact with its result; evaluating literature by its affect on the reader(see [[&amp;quot;How to Read a Page&amp;quot; by I. A. Richards]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Agency''': The ability to act and communicate (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Agitator:''' someone who urges others to protest or rebel (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aleatoric''': chaotic; random; according to chance (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ancillary:''' providing necessary but secondary support to an organization, institution, or industry (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Animism''': the spiritual belief, subscribed to by Aristotle, that all objects have souls (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antistrophos''': counterpart; opposite companion (see [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antithetical''': in direct and unequivocal opposition (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Antilogy''': a contradiction in terms or ideas (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Aphorism''': a pithy observation that contains a general truth(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Apodictic philosophy''': something demonstrated therefore true (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation:''': a connection or linking of parts to form a unity. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Articulation Theory''': is well-suited to examinations of technology because it addresses a range of cultural concerns manifest in the design, development, production, circulation, and consumption of technologies. (see [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &amp;quot;Riding The Wave&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiological:''' relating to the study of values (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axiom''': a self-evident truth that requires no proof (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Backing''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], a fact or set of facts that support an argument's warrant (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bombast''': pretentious or inflated speech or writing&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bricolage''': in art or literature, construction or creation from a diverse range of available things (see [[April 5 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Canonical''': accepted as being accurate and authoritative (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorical imperative''': the philosophical concept proposed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] that moral obligations are binding in all circumstances, regardless of positive or negative consequences (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Chariot allegory''': Socrates compares the soul to chariot horses and their rider. He believes the soul (chariot rider) is immortal and consists of one good horse and one bad horse. The soul is in constant struggle balancing and choosing between the two horses. Through the good soul only, the chariot can make it to eternity or heaven (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Classical rhetoric''': theory of persuasive discourse (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Close reading''': meticulous, word-level interpretation, rather than general analysis; has greatly influenced modern criticism (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Compendia''': a brief summary of a larger work or of a field of knowledge (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Comprehensive Sampling''': small enough to code every item (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Continuum''':  a continuous spectrum; a sequence in which the extremes are quite distinct while individual adjacent elements are similar (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Convenience Sampling''': readily available item(s) with little credibility alone (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Criterion Sampling''': texts meet certain criteria such as textual features, author attributes, intended audience, or types of media (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Data coding''': the act of sorting and classifying artifacts to quantitatively assess certain aspects of it; a five-step process including identifying a set of artifacts, defining a unit to be analyzed, creating codes to classify instances of that unit, testing the reliability of the work, and publicizing results (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Datum''':&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Death of the Author''': Roland Barthe's essay argues that the author's personal background should be irrelevant to interpretation of his or her writing; the concept proposed in the essay (see [[Barthes, Roland &amp;quot;Death of the Author&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Deictic''':  denoting a word or expression whose meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectic''': two-sided dialogue, formal argumentation system, conversation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Doxa''': constantly evolving day-to-day knowledge, sometimes culturally based (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dialectical reasoning''': moving back and forth between contrary lines of reasoning examing both arguments (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diachronic''': relating to phenomena, often literary or cultural, as they occur or change over a period of time (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dispositio''': the system used for the organization of arguments in Western classical rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-H ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ecriture''': the idea that a text's author becomes a &amp;quot;transcendental anonymity&amp;quot;; the French word for &amp;quot;writing&amp;quot;(see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Elocutio''': the mastery of stylistic elements in Western classical rhetoric and comes from the Latin ''loqui'', &amp;quot;to speak&amp;quot; (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Endoxa''': &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Entelechy''': a realization or actuality as opposed to a potentiality; the actualization of form-giving cause as contrasted with potential existence (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Enthymeme''': abbreviated form of a syllogism which assumes one of two premises is a given (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Episteme''': knowledge of the absolute, eternal truth (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Esperanto''': an artificial international language based as far as possible on words common to the chief European languages (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ethos''': the persuasive appeal of one's character, credibility, or apparent trustworthiness, especially how this character is established by means of speech or discourse (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Etymology''': the study of the history of words and their evolution over time (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Evidentials''': a form of metadiscourse used to express attitudes toward knowledge (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Existentialism''': a philosophical theory emphasizing the individual as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exegesis''': interpretation of a text often exploring its historical context and seeking to identify its cultural significance (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Exordium''': the introduction, especially  of a discourse or treatise (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Extrinsic''': not part of the essential nature of someone or something (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Fallacious''': containing or based on a fallacy (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Forensic speaking''': use of rhetoric to attack or defend someone in a judicial setting; defined by [[Aristotle]] as one of three forms of rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gaze''': to see, accidentally or on purpose, behind the curtain of public disclosure and into the private lives of research subjects. (see [[Sidler, Michelle &amp;quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre''': a continuous and structured activity; anything that a large group of people do similarly (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre agents''': documents and websites which offer key information involved in the genre process (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot; ]] ) &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Genre field''': everything that goes into making a genre (see [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Heteroglossia''': the qualities of a language (such as ideology, perspective, etc.) that are extralinguistic but common to all languages (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Homonymy''': the relation between two words that are spelled the same way but differ in meaning (see [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hypertext''': non-sequential, often digital, writing; writing &amp;quot;in which the logical connections between elements are primarily associative rather than syllogistic&amp;quot; (Slatin [[March 22 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I-L ==&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intentional fallacy''': the concept that an author's words alone, not intent, should be examined because an author's mind can never be truly known (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Interpretant''': how a person perceives a sign or representation (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inter-textual variations''': differences in the way texts are structured through alphanumeric cues (headings and numbers), spatial cues (horizontal and vertical distribution of text) and graphic cues (bullets, arrows, lines, etc.) (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intra-textual variations''': changes in typography and design within a document (see  [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Inventio''': the system or method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Isomorphous''': being of identical or similar form, shape, or structure (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Instrumental value judgment''': an argument that uses values as a means to alread accepted ends, or as obstacles to their attainment (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Intuitionism''': the theory that primary truths and principles, especially those of ethics and metaphysics, are known through intuition rather than learning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Krisis''': point of judgment, moment of decision (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Latent content''': content that is subjective or relevant because of its implied, rather than immediately apparent, meaning (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lexia''': parts of a text that are separated from the meaning of the work as a whole to show the multiplicity of meaning and references&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logology''': study of language and symbols (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logomachies''': a dispute over or about words&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logos''': the logical appeal that attempts to persuade the audience using intellect and reason (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Logical empiricism''': the school of philosophy that combines empiricism (the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world) with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M-P ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Manifest Content''': observable in a text, easy to spot, measured quantitatively (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Method''': procedures and techniques, such as content, discourse, and genre analysis (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Methodology''': assumptions and theories; “the underlying theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed” – Kirsch and Sullivan (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Modal Qualifiers''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naturans''': nature doing what nature does (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Natura naurata''': nature already created (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Criticism''': a movement that viewed texts as completely autonomous (Richards [[February 1 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''New Rhetoric''': theory of argumentation (See [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Node''': any object which is linked to another object (Slatin [[March 22 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nominalism''': the belief that universals are mere names without any reality (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Nonverbal Units''': help explore how something is communicated through physical phenomena (gestures, facial expressions) or aspects of speech (loudness, pitch, rate of speech) (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Narrative paradigm''': [[Walter Fisher]]'s theory that all forms of communication are a type of storytelling, and all human experience evolves as a type of &amp;quot;narrative.&amp;quot; This was in contrast to the [[Rational World Paradigm]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Organon''': an instrument for acquiring knowledge; specifically, a body of principles of scientific or philosophic investigation (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Orthographic''': a projection of a single view of an object onto a drawing surface in which the lines of projection are perpendicular to the drawing surface (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Parlance''': a particular way of speaking, especially a way common to those with a particular job or interest (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Paradeigma''': use of example or anecdotal evidence to prove a point (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pathos''': the appeal to emotion and shared values; often used in advertising and thought to be manipulative but also extrmeely effective (Persuasive appeals: [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pejorative''': a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Perennial''': continuing without interruption (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Phoneme''': a unit of the phonetic system of a language that corresponds to a set of similar speech sounds perceived to be a single distinctive sound in the language (e.g., the velar \k\ of cool and the palatal \k\ of keel) (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Pisteis''': proofs, persuasive appeals: (logos, ethos, pathos); artistic (logical, logos, nonlogical, ethos and pathos) and inartistic (tangible evidence) (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Play theory''': the theory that any and all activities have rules, specific outcomes, and some sort of strategy to win (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Player agents''': people involved in the process of play theory (See [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &amp;quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&amp;quot;]] )&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poeis''': fine arts (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Polyglossia''': the hybrid nature of language (see [[Mikhail Bakhtin]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakhtin#The_Dialogic_Imagination:_Chronotope.2C_Heteroglossia The Dialogic Imagination]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Positivist empiricism''': emphasizes role of experience and evidence especially sensory perception (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Priori''': relating to or derived by reasoning from self-evident propositions (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Promulgation''': to make known by open declaration; publish; proclaim formally or put into operation (a law, decree of a court, etc.). (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Proofs''': Justification, reasoning, argumentation. (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q-T ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Random sampling''': the process of collecting data by assigning a number to each element in the overall set, then use a random number generator to select units of data from the set (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalism''': the theory that truth is intellectual, not sensory, and can only be known through deductive reasoning (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rationalistic idealism''': the theory that a criterion of truth is not sensory but intelluctual and deductive (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rediscovering''': the effects of analogy or isomorphism with current forms of knowledge that allow the perception of forgotten or obscured figures (See [[Foucault, Michel &amp;quot;What Is an Author?&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Replicability''': in research, the ability of others to yield the same or similar results as those in a completed study (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Representamen''': the object that something, often a sign, represents, creating in the mind an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign (Peirce [[January 25 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetoric''': (see [[Definitions of Rhetoric]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Rhetorical units''': equivalent texts or portions of texts with the same author, intended audience, and purpose (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semantic''': of or relating to meaning in language (see [[&amp;quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&amp;quot; by Mikhail Bakhtin]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Semiology''': the study of signs (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signified''': the mental concept of an object being represented by a word or sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Signifier''': the material (or physical form) of the sign (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Spatiotemporal:''' belonging to both space and time or to space-time (see [[“The Cultural Role of Rhetoric” by Richard Weaver]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Syllogism''': a logical, deductive conclusion drawn from two related premises (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Supra-textual structuring''': visual cues that create coherence between elements of a document, e.g., headers, indentation, page orientation, white space, placement of extra-textual elements such as data display and pictures, icons, page color, and lines (see [https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/alred/www/pdf/kostelnick-rhetoricoftext.pdf Rhetoric of Text])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Synchronic''': relating to language or other phenomena at a specific period; opposite of [[diachronic]] (see [[&amp;quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&amp;quot; by Ferdinand de Saussure]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Suasory:''' intended to persuade (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]]) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Subjectivism''': the theory that that knowledge is subjective and that there is no external or objective truth (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''T-units''': “consist of a principle clause and any subordinate clauses or nonclausal structures attached to or embedded in it” – Geisler (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tautology''': the use of different words to say the same thing twice; a statement that is true because of its logical form (see [[&amp;quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&amp;quot; by Chaïm Perelman]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Techne''': an art or craft, rather than a knack (see [[&amp;quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&amp;quot; by Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Telos''': an ultimate end (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Trivium''': an introductory curriculum at medieval universities involving the study of grammar, rhetoric, and logic (Bryant [[February 3 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Tropism''': growth toward or away from external stimulus (Burke [[January 27 Class Notes]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U-Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Validity''': in research, the ability of data to answer the question being studied (see [[Rickly, Rebecca &amp;quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Verbal units''': words, phrases, and clauses that help identify how an author orients a reader to other phenomena (see [[Blythe, Stuart &amp;quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&amp;quot;]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Warrant''': in the [[Toulmin Model of Argument]], an often implicit assumption that supports the inference of the claim from the data/evidence (see [[Toulmin, Stephen &amp;quot;The Layout of Arguments&amp;quot;]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Katie T.</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>