RhetorClick - User contributions [en]

User:Rhiann

2012-04-24T13:37:14Z

Rhiann:

Student at St. Edward's University

Created Article Page for Rebecca Rickly, "Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation"

Wrote Article Summary for "Messy Contexts"

Created an Author Page with all Level 2 headings for Rebecca Rickly

Expanded and refined the article summary for "Coding Digital Texts" Blythe

Stylistic Contributions to Perelman page

In the Cheryl E. Ball author page, edited incorrect subject-verb agreement

For author pages A-H, I revised the birth/death dates to follow the conventions of the style guide.

in Dennis Baron's author page: change "gives out" to "awards" for academic tone, added transitions between the sentences to make a more cohesive piece and easier read, and cleaned up punctuation errors such as commas outside quotation marks.

Also for author pages A-H, italicized any book titles that were in quotation marks.

Added a comma to Corder's author page.

Moved "purpose of the style guide" directly below the page heading to match the conventions of the style guide.

Linked Rebecca Rickly author page to article page.

User:Rhiann

2012-04-24T13:34:58Z

Rhiann:

Student at St. Edward's University

Created Article Page for Rebecca Rickly, "Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation"

Wrote Article Summary for "Messy Contexts"

Created an Author Page with all Level 2 headings for Rebecca Rickly

Expanded and refined the article summary for "Coding Digital Texts" Blythe

Stylistic Contributions to Perelman page

In the Cheryl E. Ball author page, edited incorrect subject-verb agreement

For author pages A-H, I revised the birth/death dates to follow the conventions of the style guide.

in Dennis Baron's author page: change "gives out" to "awards" for academic tone, added transitions between the sentences to make a more cohesive piece and easier read, and cleaned up punctuation errors such as commas outside quotation marks.

Also for author pages A-H, italicized any book titles that were in quotation marks.

Added a comma to Corder's author page.

Added to Blythe's "Coding Digital Text" summary.

Linked Rebecca Rickly author page to article page.

User:Rhiann

2012-04-24T13:31:59Z

Rhiann:

Style Guide

2012-04-24T13:22:33Z

Rhiann: changed style to reflect style guidelines

This style guide will enable wiki contributors to keep a consistent voice, style, and design when adding or editing content. To make the wiki as effective as possible, it is important for both writing and design to remain consistent and accessible. Refer to the following guidelines for rules on grammar, punctuation, headings, form, and layout.

== Style Guidelines ==

* When adding a new page, give a brief description (one or two sentences) of what information is found on that page immediately beneath the title.

* When using Level 2 Headlines, put one line space between the title and the first line entry.

* For bulleted and numbered lists, put one space between the bullet point and the first word.

* For bulleted and numbered lists, put one line space between entries.

* For all headings (titles and level 2 headlines), use up-style. (Example: This Is How It Should Look / This is not how it should look)

* In the convention of Wikipedia, at the bottom of each page, put "See Also" for links to other pages within the wiki and "External Links" in level 2 headlines for useful links that are not easily integrated into the body of text.

==Writing Guidelines==

* Follow the rules of American grammar and spelling.

* Follow MLA style when using citations

* Refer to Diana Hacker's online[http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/resdoc5e/index.htm] guide to research and documentation for citation guidelines

== Article Summaries ==

* Should be written in third person

* If using quotations, use footnotes to cite

* If possible, use hyperlinks to link to an online source

* Divide the article summary into four sections: Abstract, Summary, Possible Implications, and References

* The abstract should provide a succinct summary of the article, no more than 200 words long

* The article summary should provide a comprehensive overview of the article. If possible, include quotations (with footnotes).

* Following the summary, the "Possible Implications" section is a space for a more subjective analysis of the article. While this should still be written in third person, feel free to propose alternative interpretations or links to outside sources that may be related to the article.

* Lastly, end the article summary with the "References" section. Refer to the footnotes instructions at the end of the style guide for creating the references.

* List article summaries in alphabetical order by author's last name.

* Title should be the article title (within quotation marks), followed by the author's full name. (Example: "Definition of Man" by Kenneth Burke)

* Link to the author's page somewhere within the summary.

== Glossary ==

* Bold the word being defined, followed by a colon

* If using a word/definition from an article, link to the article summary using a parenthetical reference after the definition

*Example definition-- '''Aesthetics''': study of the mind and emotions in relation to the sense of beauty (see [["The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning" by Chaïm Perelman]])

== Author Pages ==

* List authors in alphabetical order by last name. For links, write authors' names as Last Name, First Name.

* Title should be the author's full name (include middle initials, if commonly used).

* Repeat author's full name to start entry, followed by birth year and death year (if still living, write "present").

* Link to article summaries by that author under an "Article Summaries" Level 2 Headline.

* Follow this general format for all author pages: summary, biography (including education, early life, family, occupations, awards, etc.), article summaries, additional works/ publications, further readings, references, and external links. Other sections can be added as desired (such as Notable Quotes).

== Definitions of Rhetoric ==

* List authors alphabetically by last name. (Example: Burke, Kenneth)

* Do not use Level 2 Headlines for authors' name -- make the names '''bold'''.

* Use a bulleted list for definitions beneath author's name.

== References ==

* Use a numbered list -- not a bulleted list.

== Timeline ==

* List authors by First Name, Last Name.

* Link authors' names to their corresponding Authors Page.

* List authors in order by birth date, from earliest to most current.

==Footnotes==
*Use these instructions to create footnotes:

[[File:Footnotes_instructions.jpg]]

(If linking the footnote to a citation instead of a URL, put the citation within the brackets instead)

Susan Delagrange

2012-04-24T13:17:01Z

Rhiann: /* Books */

== Biography ==
Susan Delagrange received her B.A. and M.A in English at the University of Akron and went on to obtain a Ph.D. in English Rhetoric and Composition from Ohio State University in 2005. She is currently an Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Digital Media at Ohio State Univeristy.

== Additional Works/Publications ==

==== Books ====

Technologies of Wonder: Rhetorical Practice in a Digital World" --([http://ccdigitalpress.org/wonder/ full text])

=== Articles ===
: "When Revision Is Redesign: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship"--([http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.1/inventio/delagrange/ full text]) 
: "Wunderkammer, Cornell, and the Visual Canon of Arrangement"--([http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/delagrange/ full text])

=== Book Chapter ===
: “Teaching Visual Rhetoric with Maps: A Feminist Perspective.” Instructors’ Resources for Teaching Rhetorical Visions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.

== References ==
* [http://susandelagrange.com/vita.htm#publications Vita] 
* [http://susandelagrange.com/ Personal Website]
* [http://english.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/delagrange/ Profile at Ohio State University]

Susan Delagrange

2012-04-24T13:16:50Z

Rhiann: /* Books */

== Biography ==
Susan Delagrange received her B.A. and M.A in English at the University of Akron and went on to obtain a Ph.D. in English Rhetoric and Composition from Ohio State University in 2005. She is currently an Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Digital Media at Ohio State Univeristy.

== Additional Works/Publications ==

==== Books ====

Technologies of Wonder: Rhetorical Practice in a Digital Worl" --([http://ccdigitalpress.org/wonder/ full text])

=== Articles ===
: "When Revision Is Redesign: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship"--([http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.1/inventio/delagrange/ full text]) 
: "Wunderkammer, Cornell, and the Visual Canon of Arrangement"--([http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/delagrange/ full text])

=== Book Chapter ===
: “Teaching Visual Rhetoric with Maps: A Feminist Perspective.” Instructors’ Resources for Teaching Rhetorical Visions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.

== References ==
* [http://susandelagrange.com/vita.htm#publications Vita] 
* [http://susandelagrange.com/ Personal Website]
* [http://english.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/delagrange/ Profile at Ohio State University]

Jim W. Corder

2012-04-24T13:15:42Z

Rhiann: /* Biography */

== Biography ==
Jim Corder (1929-1998) was a Professor of English at Texas Christian University. In addition to his work on rhetorical studies, he wrote creative nonfiction books such as Lost in West Texas (1988), Chronicle of a Small Town (1989), and Yonder: Life on the Far Side of Change (1992). Remembered for his use of figurative language and personal experiences in his writings, Corder pushed the boundaries of typical academic writing. He is commonly classified as an "expressivist" and is well known for his "Corderian rhetoric."

== Article Summaries ==

[[Corder, Jim W. "Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love"]]

== Additional Works/Publications ==

==== Books ====
: [http://books.google.com/books?id=j255AAAAMAAJ&q=chronicle+of+a+small+town&dq=chronicle+of+a+small+town&hl=en&ei=syK_TcOVKpSztwf4-JDJBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA ''Chronicle of a Small Town'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=NSBDPgAACAAJ&dq=lost+in+west+texas&hl=en&ei=4CK_TfCCK8u3tge17oDBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA ''Lost in West Texas'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=8GZ3ZXFoisgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Yonder:+Life+on+the+Far+Side+of+Change&hl=en&ei=AiO_TY20EMi3tgf2xPDbBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Yonder%3A%20Life%20on%20the%20Far%20Side%20of%20Change&f=false ''On Living and Dying in West Texas'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=VFco80TSwm8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Hunting+Lieutenant+Chadbourne&hl=en&ei=LiO_TZGQB9OUtwfI7q3ZBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Hunting Lieutenant Chadbourne'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=uF55AAAAIAAJ&q=jim+corder&dq=jim+corder&hl=en&ei=eiW_TfPoOuPh0QGfstXXDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBA ''Selected Essays of Jim Corder'']

==== Articles/Essays ====
* “Hunting for Ethos Where They Say It Can’t Be Found.” 1989 in ''Rhetoric Review.'' Viewable on [http://www.jstor.org/pss/465706 JSTOR]

* “Learning the Text: Little Notes about Interpretation, Harold Bloom, the Topoi, and the Oratio.” 1986.

* “From Rhetoric to Grace: Propositions 55-81 about Rhetoric, Propositions 1-54 and 82 et seq. Being as Yet Unstated; Or Getting from the Classroom to the World.” 1984 in ''Rhetoric Society Quarterly''

* “On the Way, Perhaps, to a New Rhetoric, But Not There Yet, and If We Get There, There Won’t Be There Anymore.” 1985

* “Outhouses, Weather Changes, and the Return to the Basics in English Education.” 1977

* “Rhetoric and Literary Study: Some Lines of Inquiry” 1981 in ''College Composition and Communication''

* “The Story of Rhetoric: A Long Protest and a Short Program.” 1961 in ''College Composition and Communication''

* “Varieties of Ethical Argument, With Some Account of the Significance of Ethos in the Teaching of Composition.” 1978

* “What I Learned at School.” 1975 in ''College Composition and Communication''

* “When (Do I/Shall I/May I/Must I/Is It Appropriate for me to) (Say No To/Deny/Resist/ Repudiate/ Attack/Alter) Any (Poem/ Poet/Other/Piece of the World) for My Sake?” 1988 ''Rhetoric Society Quarterly''

== Further Readings ==

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Corder.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Corder.

== References ==

== External Links ==

Jim W. Corder

2012-04-24T13:15:23Z

Rhiann: /* Biography */

== Biography ==
Jim Corder (1929-1998) was a Professor of English at Texas Christian University. In addition to his work on rhetorical studies, he wrote creative nonfiction books such as Lost in West Texas (1988), Chronicle of a Small Town (1989), and Yonder: Life on the Far Side of Change (1992). Remembered for his use of figurative language and personal experiences in his writings, Corder pushed the boundaries of typical academic writing. He is commonly classified as an "expressivist" and is well known for his "Corderian rhetoric."

== Article Summaries ==

[[Corder, Jim W. "Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love"]]

== Additional Works/Publications ==

==== Books ====
: [http://books.google.com/books?id=j255AAAAMAAJ&q=chronicle+of+a+small+town&dq=chronicle+of+a+small+town&hl=en&ei=syK_TcOVKpSztwf4-JDJBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA ''Chronicle of a Small Town'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=NSBDPgAACAAJ&dq=lost+in+west+texas&hl=en&ei=4CK_TfCCK8u3tge17oDBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA ''Lost in West Texas'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=8GZ3ZXFoisgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Yonder:+Life+on+the+Far+Side+of+Change&hl=en&ei=AiO_TY20EMi3tgf2xPDbBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Yonder%3A%20Life%20on%20the%20Far%20Side%20of%20Change&f=false ''On Living and Dying in West Texas'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=VFco80TSwm8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Hunting+Lieutenant+Chadbourne&hl=en&ei=LiO_TZGQB9OUtwfI7q3ZBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Hunting Lieutenant Chadbourne'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=uF55AAAAIAAJ&q=jim+corder&dq=jim+corder&hl=en&ei=eiW_TfPoOuPh0QGfstXXDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBA ''Selected Essays of Jim Corder'']

==== Articles/Essays ====
* “Hunting for Ethos Where They Say It Can’t Be Found.” 1989 in ''Rhetoric Review.'' Viewable on [http://www.jstor.org/pss/465706 JSTOR]

* “Learning the Text: Little Notes about Interpretation, Harold Bloom, the Topoi, and the Oratio.” 1986.

* “From Rhetoric to Grace: Propositions 55-81 about Rhetoric, Propositions 1-54 and 82 et seq. Being as Yet Unstated; Or Getting from the Classroom to the World.” 1984 in ''Rhetoric Society Quarterly''

* “On the Way, Perhaps, to a New Rhetoric, But Not There Yet, and If We Get There, There Won’t Be There Anymore.” 1985

* “Outhouses, Weather Changes, and the Return to the Basics in English Education.” 1977

* “Rhetoric and Literary Study: Some Lines of Inquiry” 1981 in ''College Composition and Communication''

* “The Story of Rhetoric: A Long Protest and a Short Program.” 1961 in ''College Composition and Communication''

* “Varieties of Ethical Argument, With Some Account of the Significance of Ethos in the Teaching of Composition.” 1978

* “What I Learned at School.” 1975 in ''College Composition and Communication''

* “When (Do I/Shall I/May I/Must I/Is It Appropriate for me to) (Say No To/Deny/Resist/ Repudiate/ Attack/Alter) Any (Poem/ Poet/Other/Piece of the World) for My Sake?” 1988 ''Rhetoric Society Quarterly''

== Further Readings ==

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Corder.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Corder.

== References ==

== External Links ==

Donald C. Bryant

2012-04-24T13:10:43Z

Rhiann:

== Biography ==
Donald C. Bryant (1905-1987) studied speech and English at Cornell University. He taught at the high school and university levels; he was a professor at New York State College for Teachers, Washington University, and University of Iowa. He was an editor for The Quarterly Journal of Speech for one term, and the president of the Speech Communication Association. He is known for defining the function of rhetoric as, “Adjusting ideas to people and people to ideas.”

== Article Summaries ==

[[Bryant, Donald C. "Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope"]]

== Additional Works/ Publications ==

==== Books ====

==== Articles/Essays ====

== Further Readings ==

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Bryant.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Bryant.

== References ==

== External Links ==

Donald C. Bryant

2012-04-24T13:08:28Z

Rhiann: /* Biography */

== Biography ==
Donald C. Bryant (1905-1987) studied speech and English at Cornell University. He taught at the high school and university levels; he was a professor at New York State College for Teachers, Washington University, and University of Iowa. He was an editor for "The Quarterly Journal of Speech for one term", and the president of the "Speech Communication Association". He is known for defining the function of rhetoric as, “Adjusting ideas to people and people to ideas.”

== Article Summaries ==

[[Bryant, Donald C. "Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope"]]

== Additional Works/ Publications ==

==== Books ====

==== Articles/Essays ====

== Further Readings ==

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Bryant.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Bryant.

== References ==

== External Links ==

Stuart Blythe

2012-04-24T13:05:11Z

Rhiann: /* Article Summaries */

== Biography ==

Stuart Blythe is an associate professor in the Department of English and Linguistics at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, where he teaches courses in writing, multimedia, editing, and the teaching of composition. His recent work has appeared in College Composition and Communication, Computers and Composition, the Journal of Business and Technical Communication, and Works and Days. <ref name="Bio">McKee, Heidi A., and Danielle Nicole DeVoss, eds. Digital Writing Research. Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc., 2007. Print.</ref>

== Article Summaries ==

[[Blythe, Stuart "Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia"]]

Stuart Blythe mainly attempts to show that digital coding of texts is important for studying patterns in human behavior. He explains that the method is important to perform/provide the best research possible, and can reveal a lot about the creator’s intentions and attitudes toward the subject. Methodology can reveal more information about how data is received to answer questions like “who is involved”, “what is their view”, and “how often do they participate”. <ref name="Coding Digital Texts">Blythe, Stuart. "Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia" Digital Writing Research. Ed. Heidi A. McKee and Danielle Nicole DeVoss. Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc., 1997. 203-227. Print.</ref>

Yet, the article lacks the reason why unanalyzed critical research aims to benefit the participants and the public as much as the researcher. In digital data coding, the participant may help in performing the research and learn about the patterns they use in order to reflect on personal attitudes and actions. Reflection, Blythe argues, is extremely important because it may show new doors worth opening and a continued expansion of understanding. Essentially, “the key,” as Blythe puts it, is to approach digital data coding with the ability to put the pieces together/see the patterns “in order to create a more complete picture.”

== Additional Works/Publications ==

== Further Readings ==

Thomas, Sari. “Artifactual Study In The Analysis Of Culture: A Defense Of Content Analysis In A Postmodern Age.” Communication Research 21.6 (1994): 683-697. PsycINFO. Web.

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Blythe.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Blythe.

== References ==

<references>
<ref name="Bio">McKee, Heidi A., and Danielle Nicole DeVoss, eds. Digital Writing Research. Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc., 2007. Print.</ref> 
<ref name="Coding Digital Texts">Blythe, Stuart. "Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia" Digital Writing Research. Ed. Heidi A. McKee and Danielle Nicole DeVoss. Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc., 1997. 203-227. Print.</ref>
</references>

== External Links ==

Lloyd Bitzer

2012-04-24T12:59:11Z

Rhiann: edited date to match style guide

== Biography ==

Lloyd Bitzer (1931-present). Bitzer received his doctoral degree from the University of Iowa in 1962. He has taught at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He taught classes in rhetoric and rhetorical theory. Bitzer was an active member of the National Communication Association and was involved in the National Development Project in Rhetoric in 1970. Bitzer is best known for the theory of situational rhetoric, which he advanced in the 1968 article “The Rhetorical Situation.” Bitzer is currently professor emeritus at Wisconsin.

== Article Summaries ==

[[Bitzer, Lloyd "The Rhetorical Situation"]]

== Additional Works/ Publications ==

==== Books ====

==== Articles/Essays ====

“Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.”<ref>“Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 58.4 (1959): 399–408. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. UTSA Lib., 28 Sep. 08. </ref>

“A Re-evaluation of Campbell’s Doctrine of Evidence.”<ref>“A Re-evaluation of Campbell’s Doctrine of Evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 59.1 (1960): 135–40. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. UTSA Lib., 28 Sep. 08. </ref>

[http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~davis/crs/E398t/Bitzer--Rhetorical%20Situation.pdf "The Rhetorical Situation"]<ref>“The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1.1 (1968): 1–14. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. UTSA Lib., 29 Sep. 08. </ref>

“Hume’s Philosophy in George Campbell’s Philosophy of Rhetoric.”<ref>“Hume’s Philosophy in George Campbell’s Philosophy of Rhetoric.” Journal of Philosophy and Rhetoric 2.3 (1969): 139–66.</ref>

“Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” <ref>“Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric. Ed. Keith V. Erickson. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow P, 1974.</ref>

“Rhetoric and Public Knowledge.” <ref>“Rhetoric and Public Knowledge.” Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Literature: An Exploration. Ed. Don M. Burks. West Lafayette, Ind: Purdue UP, 1976: 67–93.</ref>

“Functional Communication: A Situational Perspective.”<ref>“Functional Communication: A Situational Perspective.” Rhetoric in Transition: Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric. Ed. Eugene E. White. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1980: 21–38.</ref>

“Bitzer on Vatz.”<ref>“Bitzer on Vatz.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 67.1 (1981): 99–101. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. UTSA Lib., 18 Oct. 08. </ref>

“All Art is Founded in Science.”<ref>“All Art is Founded in Science.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 13.1 (1983): 13–14. Humanities Index. JSTOR. UTSA Lib., 29 Sep. 08. </ref>

“George Orwell’s Rejection of Tyrannical Rhetoric.”<ref>“George Orwell’s Rejection of Tyrannical Rhetoric.” Oldspeak/Newspeak: Rhetorical Transformations. Ed. Charles W. Kneupper. Arlington, TX: Rhetorical Society of America, 1985: 1–6. </ref>

“Whately’s Distinction Between Inferring and Proving.”<ref>“Whately’s Distinction Between Inferring and Proving.” Journal of Philosophy and Rhetoric 25.4 (1992): 311–40. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. UTSA Lib., 14 Oct. 08.</ref>

“Rhetoric’s Prospects: Past and Future.”<ref>“Rhetoric’s Prospects: Past and Future.” Making and Unmaking the Prospects for Rhetoric. Eds. Theresa Enos and Richard McNabb. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Earlbaum Associates, 1997: 15–20.</ref>

“The ‘Indian Prince’ in miracle arguments of Hume and His Predecessors and Early Critics.”<ref>“The ‘Indian Prince’ in miracle arguments of Hume and His Predecessors and Early Critics.” Journal of Philosophy and Rhetoric 31.3 (1998): 175–230. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. UTSA Lib., 16 Oct. 08.</ref>

“Edwin Black at Wisconsin, 1967–1994.”<ref>“Edwin Black at Wisconsin, 1967–1994.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 10. (Oct. 2007): 497–500. Humanities Index. Muse. UTSA Lib., 18 Oct. 08. </ref>

== Further Readings ==

[http://compfaqs.org/CompositionFounders/TheAnnotatedBibliographyOfTheWorksWrittenAndEditedByLloydBitzer The Annotated Bibliography of the Works Written and Edited by Lloyd Bitzer]

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

==== Opposition ====

[[Richard Vatz]]

== References ==

<references>

== External Links ==
* [http://www.phillwebb.net/topics/communication/Bitzer/Bitzer.htm Bitzer related Bibliography]

David Bartholomae

2012-04-24T07:34:50Z

Rhiann: stylistic changes. typo correction.

== Biography ==

David Bartholomae (1948-present) received his PhD from Rutgers University in 1975. He is a Professor of English and a former Chair of the English Department at the University of Pittsburgh. His primary research interest are in Composition, Literacy and Pedagogy, although his work engages scholarship in Rhetoric and in American Literature/American Studies. <ref>http://www.composition.pitt.edu/people/faculty/bartholomae/index.html</ref>

== Article Summaries ==

[[Bartholomae, David "Inventing the University"]] [http://www.firstyearwriting.wikispaces.com/file/.../Inventing+the+University.pdf full text]

== Additional Works/ Publications ==

==== Books ====

"Writing on the Margins: Essays on Composition and Teaching"<ref>"Writing on the Margins: Essays on Composition and Teaching" (Hardcover: Palgrave/Macmillan; Softcover: Bedford/St. Martins), 2005.</ref>

"The Teaching of Writing: The Eighty fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education"<ref>"The Teaching of Writing: The Eighty fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education," ed. with Anthony R. Petrosky (Chicago: NSSE and The University of Chicago Press, 1986).</ref>

"Facts, Artifacts and Counterfacts: Reading and Writing in Theory and Practice"<ref>"Facts, Artifacts and Counterfacts: Reading and Writing in Theory and Practice," with Anthony R. Petrosky (Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook, 1986).</ref>

"Ways of Reading: Words and Images"<ref>"Ways of Reading: Words and Images," with Anthony R. Petrosky (Boston: Bedford Books, 2003).</ref>

"Reading the Lives of Others: History and Ethnography"<ref>"Reading the Lives of Others: History and Ethnography," with Anthony R. Petrosky (Boston: Bedford Books, 1994).</ref>

"Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Writers"<ref>"Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Writers," with Anthony R. Petrosky (Boston: Bedford Books, 1987). Seven editions.</ref>

==== Articles/Essays ====

== Further Readings ==

[http://composingthoughts.qwriting.org/files/2011/01/Bartholomae.assign.pdf "Writing Assignments: Where Writing Begins"]

[http://scribe.richmond.edu/training/383/383restricted/Bartholomae.pdf "The Study of Error"]

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

==== Opposition ====

== References ==

== External Links ==

<references>

Roland Barthes

2012-04-24T07:30:58Z

Rhiann: edited titles of works to appear in quotations. wording changes.

== Biography ==
Roland Barthes (1915-1980) was a French philosopher, literary theorist, and critic. He taught in France, Romania, and Egypt while he wrote "Writing Degree Zero." In 1952, he started to study at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique sociology and lexicology. After writing numerous well-known essays, Barthes began traveling to lecture. In 1967, he wrote "The Death of the Author," and in 1977, he was elected to the chair of Semilogie Litteraire at the College de France.

'''Education'''
* Degree in Classical letters (1939) and Degree in Grammar and Philology (1943) from University of Paris

== Article Summaries ==

[[Barthes, Roland "Death of the Author"]]

== Additional Works/ Publications ==

==== Books ====
: [http://books.google.com/books?id=YHpanFeYSjwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=writing+degree+zero&hl=en&src=bmrr&ei=hxy_Tf7vFIe4tgeEh7HhBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CFoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Writing Degree Zero'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=TZ2ZOeDWHEQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+eiffel+tower+and+other+mythologies&hl=en&ei=thy_TaTINYK-tgfB0v3KBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''The Eiffel Tower and other Mythologies'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=ptzHQgAACAAJ&dq=on+racine&hl=en&src=bmrr&ei=3By_TZ7qOM2itgfMrbHiBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA ''On Racine'']

: [http://books.google.com/books?id=jvpwygq9i3UC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Roland+barthes&hl=en&ei=Gx2_TdilH8yltweDsqy0BQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CFcQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''The Fashion System'']

==== Articles/Essays ====

== Further Readings ==

[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/54319/Roland-Barthes Brittanica's entry on Roland Barthes]

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Aristotle.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Aristotle.

== References ==

== External Links ==

Cheryl E. Ball

2012-04-23T19:56:35Z

Rhiann: /* Biography */

== Biography ==

Cheryl E. Ball is an Associate Professor of New Media Studies in the English Department at Illinois State University. Ball's areas of specialization include scholarly multimedia, multimodal composition, digital publishing, and teaching with technology.

'''Education'''
*B.A. in English from Old Dominion University, 1996
*M.F.A. in Poetry from Virginia Commonwealth University, 2000
*Ph.D. in Rhetorical & Technical Communication from Michigan Technological University, 2005

== Article Summaries ==

[[Ball, Cheryl et al., "Integrating Multimodality in Composition Curricula: Survey Methodology and Results from a CCCC Research Grant"]]

== Additional Works/ Publications ==

==== Books ====

==== Articles/Essays ====

== Further Readings ==

== References ==

== Other Scholarly Views ==

==== Agreement ====

Those authors that agree with Ball.

==== Opposition ====

Those authors that disagree with Ball.

== External Links ==

[http://www.ceball.com/tenure/ "Cheryl E. Ball's online portfolio]

User:Rhiann

2012-04-12T17:10:48Z

Rhiann:

2012-04-12T16:17:59Z

Rhiann:

In his article, Blythe discusses why he believes coding to be an important device when analyzing digital texts. He breaks his argument up into two main sections - “Methods” and “Methodology.” In the first section, Blythe breaks down the coding procedure step by step beginning with how to choose your artifact and finishing with how to analyze your results. Blythe explained methods of coding in a sequential order, the first of which is defining sets and selecting samples, The second being defining a unit of analysis (verbal and non-verbal Verbal) as being the aspects of spoken or written discourse such as words, t-units, exchanges, rhetorical units,and non-verbal being cues such as facial expressions and intonation. The third being coding visuals. The fourth, coding links which is followed by coding for manifest or latent content. Next being creating a set of codes. During this step it is important to Blythe that the coder is flexible on defining the codes (216). He explains that, “Essentially, analysis involves finding patterns and interesting anomalies in the coded data. To some extent, analysis may be an intuitive process based upon a researcher’s ability to find interesting trends in the data” (220). In the methodology section of his article, Blythe addresses arguments against coding and provides rebuttals. The main argument he addresses is that the individual gets lost in data coding, where the focus is on the “big picture” (226). Blythe humbly states in his conclusion, “The key to data coding, then, is knowing what it will reveal and conceal, and to combine it with other methods in order to create a more complete picture” (226).

Perelman, Chaïm "The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning"

2012-02-14T08:06:52Z

Rhiann:

In "The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning" [[Chaim Perelman]] starts his essay by explaining the fall out of classical rhetoric, and how the current rhetoric is different from the definitions it used to have. He doesn’t disavow idea of classical rhetoric completely, though; he gives examples showing that classical rhetoric was practical, rather than just empty style. Perelman tells how he discovered what he calls new rhetoric by studying how people make value judgments (connects with dialectical reasoning). Since the new rhetoric is “a theory of argumentation,” it is important to understand what differentiates argumentation from simply demonstrating (153). A demonstration is based off of rules and guidelines that were previously created. In demonstration, the orator/rhetor does not try to persuade or compel his or her audience. Argumentation, however, has the purpose of moving the audience, persuading the audience, communicating with the audience, and getting the audience to listen (154-55). All argumentation, therefore, must be made to be effective to its audience. This is where new rhetoric differentiates from classical rhetoric. New rhetoric “has a wider scope as nonformal reasoning that aims at obtaining or reinforcing the adherence of an audience” (155).
After learning what new rhetoric is, Perelman teaches us how it works. There are the uses of facts, truths, presumptions, values, hierarchies, and loci of the preferable. Facts and truths are things universally agreed upon; the orator does not need to spent his or her time trying to get the audience to believe these facts/truths. Values play the role of moving the audience, influencing their decisions. Perelman mentions that values that may seem universal are really not. He argues there is just a desire for an universal agreement. In any situation, the orator must “know the opinion of [his or her] audience,” so he or she can answer any questions asked (159). The orator must be have prepared his argument with relevant information both to the audience and the subject. They must also know what they considered a strong/weak argument, and what type of argument will get his audience will care for (listen to), and what type of argument his audience won’t care about (159). The orator must choose an effective argument and structure it so his or her audience comes to his or her desired conclusion.
Perelman talks about Quasi Logical arguments that uses an artificial language so “one sign can have only one meaning” (162). There are also arguments that appeal to the real, meaning they are based on reality’s structure. Arguments that attempt to establish the real are arguments trying to generate a reality.
Perelman also discusses how to deal with dissociation. According to him, philosophers use dissociation to move the audience from common sense into a “vision of reality” that doesn’t have conflict of opinions.