https://rhetorclick.com/index.php?feed=atom&target=Samuel_Campbell&title=Special%3AContributions%2FSamuel_Campbell 2026-05-09T07:29:49Z From RhetorClick MediaWiki 1.16.1 https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2012-04-13T19:13:27Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>This page links to in-depth article summaries from prominent authors in this field. Links are organized by author's last name.<br /> <br /> [[Article Summary Template]]<br /> <br /> == A-D == <br /> * [[Aristotle, Poetics]]<br /> * [[Aristotle, Rhetoric]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Blythe, Stuart &quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bitzer, Lloyd &quot;The Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bizzell, Patricia &quot;Arguing About Literacy&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bormann, Ernest G. &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> * [[Cope, Bill and Kalantzis, Mary. &quot;A Grammar of Multimodality&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Delagrange, Susan &quot;When Reflection is Re-Design: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship&quot;]]<br /> * [[DePew, Kevin Eric “Through the Eyes of Researchers, Rhetors, and Audiences”]]<br /> * [[Downs, Douglas and Elizabeth Wardle “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> <br /> == E-H ==<br /> * [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Ehninger, Douglas &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Fisher, Walter &quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&quot;]]<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> * [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &quot;Riding The Wave&quot;]]<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> <br /> == I-L ==<br /> * [[Jenkins, Henry &quot;Eight Traits of the New Media Landscape&quot;]]<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == M-P ==<br /> * [[McIntire-Strasburg, Janice &quot;Multimedia Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]<br /> * [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&quot;]]<br /> * [[Mooney, Annabelle &quot;The Rhetoric of Cults: Intoduction&quot;]]<br /> <br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Q-T ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> * [[Rickly, Rebecca &quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sidler, Michelle &quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U-X ==<br /> * [[Vatz, Richard &quot;The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Wardle, Elizabeth and Douglas Downs “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == Y &amp; Z ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key&quot;]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2012-04-13T19:13:18Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>This page links to in-depth article summaries from prominent authors in this field. Links are organized by author's last name.<br /> [[Article Summary Template]]<br /> <br /> == A-D == <br /> * [[Aristotle, Poetics]]<br /> * [[Aristotle, Rhetoric]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Blythe, Stuart &quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bitzer, Lloyd &quot;The Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bizzell, Patricia &quot;Arguing About Literacy&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bormann, Ernest G. &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> * [[Cope, Bill and Kalantzis, Mary. &quot;A Grammar of Multimodality&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Delagrange, Susan &quot;When Reflection is Re-Design: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship&quot;]]<br /> * [[DePew, Kevin Eric “Through the Eyes of Researchers, Rhetors, and Audiences”]]<br /> * [[Downs, Douglas and Elizabeth Wardle “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> <br /> == E-H ==<br /> * [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Ehninger, Douglas &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Fisher, Walter &quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&quot;]]<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> * [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &quot;Riding The Wave&quot;]]<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> <br /> == I-L ==<br /> * [[Jenkins, Henry &quot;Eight Traits of the New Media Landscape&quot;]]<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == M-P ==<br /> * [[McIntire-Strasburg, Janice &quot;Multimedia Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]<br /> * [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&quot;]]<br /> * [[Mooney, Annabelle &quot;The Rhetoric of Cults: Intoduction&quot;]]<br /> <br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Q-T ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> * [[Rickly, Rebecca &quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sidler, Michelle &quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U-X ==<br /> * [[Vatz, Richard &quot;The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Wardle, Elizabeth and Douglas Downs “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == Y &amp; Z ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key&quot;]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Author_Page_template 2012-04-13T19:12:55Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>'''This is a template for users to utilize to maintain consistent style in new pages. Simply edit, copy, and paste into the blank new author page. Then fill in content. Edits to this template are welcome as style guidelines evolve.'''<br /> <br /> == Biography ==<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Author_Page_template 2012-04-13T19:11:46Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: Created page with &quot; == Biography == == Article Summaries == == Additional Works/ Publications == ==== Books ==== ==== Articles/Essays ==== == Further Readings == == Other Scholarly Views ==...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div><br /> == Biography ==<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Authors 2012-04-13T19:10:54Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>All authors are organized by their last names. Just click on the corresponding letter.<br /> <br /> [[Author Page template]]<br /> <br /> == A-D ==<br /> <br /> *[[Aristotle]]<br /> *[[Mikhail_Bakhtin|Bakhtin, Mikhail]]<br /> *[[Cheryl E. Ball]]<br /> *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Baron Baron, Dennis]<br /> *[[Roland_Barthes|Barthes, Roland]]<br /> *[[Lloyd_Bitzer|Bitzer, Lloyd]]<br /> *[[Patricia_Bizzell|Bizzell, Patricia]]<br /> *[[Stuart_Blythe|Blythe, Stuart]]<br /> *[[Susan_Delagrange|Delagrange, Susan]]<br /> *[[Brent_Douglas|Brent, Douglas]]<br /> *[[Donald_C._Bryant|Bryant, Donald C.]]<br /> *[[Bormann_Ernest_G.|Bormann, Ernest G.]]<br /> *[[Kenneth_Burke|Burke, Kenneth]]<br /> *[[Jim_W._Corder|Corder, Jim W.]]<br /> *[[Kevin_Eric_DePew|DePew, Kevin Eric]]<br /> *[[Douglas_Downs|Downs, Douglas]]<br /> <br /> == E-H ==<br /> <br /> *[[Lisa_S._Ede|Ede, Lisa S.]]<br /> *[[Douglas_Ehninger|Ehninger, Douglas]]<br /> *[[Walter_Fisher|Fisher, Walter]]<br /> *[[Michel_Foucault|Foucault, Michel]]<br /> *[[Michael_S._Halloran|Halloran, Michael S.]]<br /> *[[Bill_Hart-Davidson|Hart-Davidson, Bill]]<br /> <br /> <br /> == I-L ==<br /> <br /> *[[Henry_Jenkins|Jenkins, Henry]]<br /> *[[Johndan_Johnson-Eilola|Johnson-Eilola, Johndan]]<br /> *[[Steven_D._Krause|Krause, Steven D.]]<br /> *[[John_Logie|Logie, John]]<br /> *[[Andrea_A._Lunsford|Lunsford, Andrea A.]]<br /> <br /> == M-P ==<br /> <br /> *[[Janice_McIntire-Strasburg|McIntire-Strasburg, Janice]]<br /> *[[Richard_McKeon|McKeon, Richard]]<br /> *[[Richard_Ohmann|Ohmann, Richard]]<br /> *[[Mike_Palmquist|Palmquist, Mike]]<br /> *[[Chaim_Perelman|Perelman, Chaim]]<br /> *[[Plato]]<br /> <br /> == Q-T ==<br /> <br /> *[[I._A._Richards|Richards, I. A.]]<br /> *[[Rebecca_Rickly|Rickly, Rebecca]]<br /> *[[Ferdinand_de_Saussure|Saussure, Ferdinand de]]<br /> *[[Robert_L._Scott|Scott, Robert L.]]<br /> *[[Cynthia_L._Selfe|Selfe, Cynthia L.]]<br /> *[[Richard_J._Selfe_Jr.|Selfe, Richard L.]]<br /> *[[Michelle_Sidler|Sidler, Michelle]]<br /> *[[John_M._Slatin|Slatin, John M.]]<br /> *[[Madeleine_Sorapure|Sorapure, Madeleine]]<br /> *[[Stephen_Toulmin|Toulmin, Stephen]]<br /> <br /> == U-Z ==<br /> <br /> *[[Richard_Vatz|Vatz, Richard]]<br /> *[[Elizabeth_Wardle|Wardle, Elizabeth]]<br /> *[[Quinn_Warnick|Warnick, Quinn]]<br /> *[[Richard_Weaver|Weaver, Richard]]<br /> *[[Sean_D._Williams|Williams, Sean D.]]<br /> *[[Kathleen_Blake_Yancey|Yancey, Kathleen Blake]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summary_Template 2012-04-13T19:09:38Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>'''This is a template for users to utilize to maintain consistent style in new pages. Simply edit, copy, and paste into the blank new article summary. Then replace dummy text with content. Edits to this template are welcome as style guidelines evolve.'''<br /> <br /> == Brief Summary ==<br /> <br /> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam tristique, tortor quis accumsan tincidunt, ligula justo eleifend nisl, venenatis hendrerit massa tortor et nulla. Duis ornare massa a dolor congue quis tristique leo euismod. Vivamus aliquam magna metus, consequat fringilla nisi. Fusce leo nulla, ultrices in viverra sed, ornare auctor massa. Phasellus id tellus vel elit posuere feugiat. Etiam ac lacinia velit. Morbi eu turpis vitae metus facilisis viverra. Curabitur non sem vel ipsum vestibulum blandit. Suspendisse laoreet quam a massa iaculis vitae aliquam mi pulvinar. Aenean feugiat ornare dignissim. <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> [[Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet]]<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam tristique, tortor quis accumsan tincidunt, ligula justo eleifend nisl, venenatis hendrerit massa tortor et nulla. Duis ornare massa a dolor congue quis tristique leo euismod. Vivamus aliquam magna metus.</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summary_Template 2012-04-13T19:09:06Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: Created page with &quot;'''This is a template for users to utilize to maintain consistent style in new pages. Simply edit, copy, and paste, then replace dummy text with content. Edits to this template a...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>'''This is a template for users to utilize to maintain consistent style in new pages. Simply edit, copy, and paste, then replace dummy text with content. Edits to this template are welcome as style guidelines evolve.'''<br /> <br /> == Brief Summary ==<br /> <br /> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam tristique, tortor quis accumsan tincidunt, ligula justo eleifend nisl, venenatis hendrerit massa tortor et nulla. Duis ornare massa a dolor congue quis tristique leo euismod. Vivamus aliquam magna metus, consequat fringilla nisi. Fusce leo nulla, ultrices in viverra sed, ornare auctor massa. Phasellus id tellus vel elit posuere feugiat. Etiam ac lacinia velit. Morbi eu turpis vitae metus facilisis viverra. Curabitur non sem vel ipsum vestibulum blandit. Suspendisse laoreet quam a massa iaculis vitae aliquam mi pulvinar. Aenean feugiat ornare dignissim. <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> [[Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet]]<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam tristique, tortor quis accumsan tincidunt, ligula justo eleifend nisl, venenatis hendrerit massa tortor et nulla. Duis ornare massa a dolor congue quis tristique leo euismod. Vivamus aliquam magna metus.</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2012-04-13T19:04:29Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>This page links to in-depth article summaries from prominent authors in this field. Links are organized by author's last name.<br /> * [[Article Summary Template]]<br /> <br /> == A-D == <br /> * [[Aristotle, Poetics]]<br /> * [[Aristotle, Rhetoric]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Blythe, Stuart &quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bitzer, Lloyd &quot;The Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bizzell, Patricia &quot;Arguing About Literacy&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bormann, Ernest G. &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> * [[Cope, Bill and Kalantzis, Mary. &quot;A Grammar of Multimodality&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Delagrange, Susan &quot;When Reflection is Re-Design: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship&quot;]]<br /> * [[DePew, Kevin Eric “Through the Eyes of Researchers, Rhetors, and Audiences”]]<br /> * [[Downs, Douglas and Elizabeth Wardle “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> <br /> == E-H ==<br /> * [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Ehninger, Douglas &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Fisher, Walter &quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&quot;]]<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> * [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &quot;Riding The Wave&quot;]]<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> <br /> == I-L ==<br /> * [[Jenkins, Henry &quot;Eight Traits of the New Media Landscape&quot;]]<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == M-P ==<br /> * [[McIntire-Strasburg, Janice &quot;Multimedia Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]<br /> * [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&quot;]]<br /> * [[Mooney, Annabelle &quot;The Rhetoric of Cults: Intoduction&quot;]]<br /> <br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Q-T ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> * [[Rickly, Rebecca &quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sidler, Michelle &quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U-X ==<br /> * [[Vatz, Richard &quot;The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Wardle, Elizabeth and Douglas Downs “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == Y &amp; Z ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key&quot;]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements 2012-04-13T18:52:17Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* Video Games */</p> <hr /> <div>This page discusses key rhetorical movements and the theories associated with those movements.<br /> <br /> == Conservatism ==<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]], 1910-1963: man's nature is fourfold (rational, emotional, ethical, religious), [[God and Devil Terms]], [[Noble Rhetoric]], [[Anti-Nominalism]]<br /> <br /> == Emerging Media ==<br /> ===Film===<br /> ===Video Games===<br /> <br /> [http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/026269364Xchap6.pdf ''Ian Bogost: the Rhetoric of Video Games'']<br /> <br /> ===Blogging===<br /> ===Fan Fiction===<br /> ===Online Communities===<br /> <br /> ==Feminist Criticism==<br /> <br /> [[Celeste Condit]], author of [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335639209384002#preview &quot;Post-Burke: Transcending the Sub-Stance of Dramatism&quot;] (1992).<br /> <br /> [[Phyllis M. Japp]], author of “Can This Marriage Be Saved? Reclaiming Burke for Feminist Scholarship&quot; from [http://books.google.com/books?id=CcD9wYsIy1kC&amp;pg=PA113&amp;lpg=PA113&amp;dq=Can+This+Marriage+Be+Saved?+Reclaiming+Burke+for+Feminist+Scholarship&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=0VKRayAKL4&amp;sig=ngZCugp8lAoRrM0FwJ9pjQqId5Y&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=sTeHT_eJG4aS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=Can%20This%20Marriage%20Be%20Saved%3F%20Reclaiming%20Burke%20for%20Feminist%20Scholarship&amp;f=false Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century] (1999).<br /> <br /> == Literary Criticism ==<br /> <br /> [[I. A. Richards]], 1893-1979: father of [[New Criticism]]<br /> <br /> == New Rhetorics ==<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]], 1905-1987: [[definitions of rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]], 1897-1993: [[Dramatistic Pentad]] (act, scene, agent, agency, purpose), [[Definition of Man]] as symbol-using animal<br /> <br /> [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Chaim_Perelman Chaim Perelman], 1912-1984: [[New Rhetorics]]<br /> <br /> == Pedagogical Studies ==<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]], b. 1947: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Andrea A. Lunsford]], b. 1942: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-structuralism ''Post-Structuralism''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]], 1926-1984: [[author-function]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogerian_argument ''Rogerian Rhetoric''] ==<br /> Rogerian rhetoric is derived from the theories of Carl Rogers. Rogers originally developed his ideas as a method of therapy that was centered around understanding the person being treated. Initially called non-directive therapy, this system became the foundation for Rogers' broader ideas of the self and learning. These ideas have been applied across disciplines, heavily influencing one branch of rhetorical studies.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric then, is the idea that persuasion is most effective when the positions on all side of the argument are understood, and a connection is made between the people involved. Terms such as non-combative and person-centered are some of the theory's watch-words.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric typically consists of 4 main stages:<br /> # An introduction to the problem and a demonstration that the opponent's position is understood.<br /> # A statement of the contexts in which the opponent's position may be valid.<br /> # A statement of the writer's position, including the contexts in which it is valid.<br /> # A statement of how the opponent's position would benefit if he were to adopt elements of the writer's position. If the writer can show that the positions complement each other, that each supplies what the other lacks, so much the better (Brent)<br /> <br /> <br /> [[Douglas Brent]]: [[Rogerian Rhetoric as an alternative to Traditional Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]], 1929-1998: [[argument as emergence toward the other]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics ''Semiotics''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]], 1857-1913: [[signified and signifier are core of semiotics]]<br /> <br /> [[Roland Barthes]], 1915-1980: author and scriptor, neutral and novelistic writing<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], 1895-1975: [[Polyphony]], [[Unfinalizability]], [[Carnival and Grotesque]], [[Chronotope]], [[Heteroglossia]] (&quot;The Dialogic Imagination&quot;), [[Speech genres]]<br /> <br /> == Writing and Technology ==<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]], b. 1944:<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]]: [[Influential Role in &quot;Computers in the Composition Classroom&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]: [[Computer Interface as Representation of Oppression of Diverse Cultures]]<br /> <br /> == Uncategorized ==<br /> <br /> '''Authors'''<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]], 1922-2009: [[Toulmin Model of Argument]]<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]], b. 1928: [[Epistemic Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]], b. 1931: <br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]], b. 1939: [[Rhetoric in Existentialist Literature]]<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]]:<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]]:<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]:<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]: <br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]:<br /> <br /> [[Steven Fraiberg]]:<br /> <br /> Sorapure et al.?<br /> <br /> Palmquist et al.?<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]] and [[Steven D. Krause]]:<br /> <br /> [[Douglas Downs]] and [[Elizabeth Wardle]]:<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Theories/Movements'''<br /> <br /> [[Belletristic/Elocution]]<br /> <br /> [[Semanticism]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements 2012-04-13T18:50:46Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>This page discusses key rhetorical movements and the theories associated with those movements.<br /> <br /> == Conservatism ==<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]], 1910-1963: man's nature is fourfold (rational, emotional, ethical, religious), [[God and Devil Terms]], [[Noble Rhetoric]], [[Anti-Nominalism]]<br /> <br /> == Emerging Media ==<br /> ===Film===<br /> ===Video Games===<br /> ===Blogging===<br /> ===Fan Fiction===<br /> ===Online Communities===<br /> <br /> ==Feminist Criticism==<br /> <br /> [[Celeste Condit]], author of [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335639209384002#preview &quot;Post-Burke: Transcending the Sub-Stance of Dramatism&quot;] (1992).<br /> <br /> [[Phyllis M. Japp]], author of “Can This Marriage Be Saved? Reclaiming Burke for Feminist Scholarship&quot; from [http://books.google.com/books?id=CcD9wYsIy1kC&amp;pg=PA113&amp;lpg=PA113&amp;dq=Can+This+Marriage+Be+Saved?+Reclaiming+Burke+for+Feminist+Scholarship&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=0VKRayAKL4&amp;sig=ngZCugp8lAoRrM0FwJ9pjQqId5Y&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=sTeHT_eJG4aS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=Can%20This%20Marriage%20Be%20Saved%3F%20Reclaiming%20Burke%20for%20Feminist%20Scholarship&amp;f=false Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century] (1999).<br /> <br /> == Literary Criticism ==<br /> <br /> [[I. A. Richards]], 1893-1979: father of [[New Criticism]]<br /> <br /> == New Rhetorics ==<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]], 1905-1987: [[definitions of rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]], 1897-1993: [[Dramatistic Pentad]] (act, scene, agent, agency, purpose), [[Definition of Man]] as symbol-using animal<br /> <br /> [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Chaim_Perelman Chaim Perelman], 1912-1984: [[New Rhetorics]]<br /> <br /> == Pedagogical Studies ==<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]], b. 1947: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Andrea A. Lunsford]], b. 1942: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-structuralism ''Post-Structuralism''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]], 1926-1984: [[author-function]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogerian_argument ''Rogerian Rhetoric''] ==<br /> Rogerian rhetoric is derived from the theories of Carl Rogers. Rogers originally developed his ideas as a method of therapy that was centered around understanding the person being treated. Initially called non-directive therapy, this system became the foundation for Rogers' broader ideas of the self and learning. These ideas have been applied across disciplines, heavily influencing one branch of rhetorical studies.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric then, is the idea that persuasion is most effective when the positions on all side of the argument are understood, and a connection is made between the people involved. Terms such as non-combative and person-centered are some of the theory's watch-words.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric typically consists of 4 main stages:<br /> # An introduction to the problem and a demonstration that the opponent's position is understood.<br /> # A statement of the contexts in which the opponent's position may be valid.<br /> # A statement of the writer's position, including the contexts in which it is valid.<br /> # A statement of how the opponent's position would benefit if he were to adopt elements of the writer's position. If the writer can show that the positions complement each other, that each supplies what the other lacks, so much the better (Brent)<br /> <br /> <br /> [[Douglas Brent]]: [[Rogerian Rhetoric as an alternative to Traditional Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]], 1929-1998: [[argument as emergence toward the other]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics ''Semiotics''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]], 1857-1913: [[signified and signifier are core of semiotics]]<br /> <br /> [[Roland Barthes]], 1915-1980: author and scriptor, neutral and novelistic writing<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], 1895-1975: [[Polyphony]], [[Unfinalizability]], [[Carnival and Grotesque]], [[Chronotope]], [[Heteroglossia]] (&quot;The Dialogic Imagination&quot;), [[Speech genres]]<br /> <br /> == Writing and Technology ==<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]], b. 1944:<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]]: [[Influential Role in &quot;Computers in the Composition Classroom&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]: [[Computer Interface as Representation of Oppression of Diverse Cultures]]<br /> <br /> == Uncategorized ==<br /> <br /> '''Authors'''<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]], 1922-2009: [[Toulmin Model of Argument]]<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]], b. 1928: [[Epistemic Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]], b. 1931: <br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]], b. 1939: [[Rhetoric in Existentialist Literature]]<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]]:<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]]:<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]:<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]: <br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]:<br /> <br /> [[Steven Fraiberg]]:<br /> <br /> Sorapure et al.?<br /> <br /> Palmquist et al.?<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]] and [[Steven D. Krause]]:<br /> <br /> [[Douglas Downs]] and [[Elizabeth Wardle]]:<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Theories/Movements'''<br /> <br /> [[Belletristic/Elocution]]<br /> <br /> [[Semanticism]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements 2012-04-13T18:49:48Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>This page discusses key rhetorical movements and the theories associated with those movements.<br /> <br /> == Conservatism ==<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]], 1910-1963: man's nature is fourfold (rational, emotional, ethical, religious), [[God and Devil Terms]], [[Noble Rhetoric]], [[Anti-Nominalism]]<br /> <br /> == Emerging Media ==<br /> ===Video Games===<br /> ===Film===<br /> ===Blogging===<br /> ===Fan Fiction===<br /> <br /> ==Feminist Criticism==<br /> <br /> [[Celeste Condit]], author of [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335639209384002#preview &quot;Post-Burke: Transcending the Sub-Stance of Dramatism&quot;] (1992).<br /> <br /> [[Phyllis M. Japp]], author of “Can This Marriage Be Saved? Reclaiming Burke for Feminist Scholarship&quot; from [http://books.google.com/books?id=CcD9wYsIy1kC&amp;pg=PA113&amp;lpg=PA113&amp;dq=Can+This+Marriage+Be+Saved?+Reclaiming+Burke+for+Feminist+Scholarship&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=0VKRayAKL4&amp;sig=ngZCugp8lAoRrM0FwJ9pjQqId5Y&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=sTeHT_eJG4aS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=Can%20This%20Marriage%20Be%20Saved%3F%20Reclaiming%20Burke%20for%20Feminist%20Scholarship&amp;f=false Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century] (1999).<br /> <br /> == Literary Criticism ==<br /> <br /> [[I. A. Richards]], 1893-1979: father of [[New Criticism]]<br /> <br /> == New Rhetorics ==<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]], 1905-1987: [[definitions of rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]], 1897-1993: [[Dramatistic Pentad]] (act, scene, agent, agency, purpose), [[Definition of Man]] as symbol-using animal<br /> <br /> [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Chaim_Perelman Chaim Perelman], 1912-1984: [[New Rhetorics]]<br /> <br /> == Pedagogical Studies ==<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]], b. 1947: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Andrea A. Lunsford]], b. 1942: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-structuralism ''Post-Structuralism''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]], 1926-1984: [[author-function]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogerian_argument ''Rogerian Rhetoric''] ==<br /> Rogerian rhetoric is derived from the theories of Carl Rogers. Rogers originally developed his ideas as a method of therapy that was centered around understanding the person being treated. Initially called non-directive therapy, this system became the foundation for Rogers' broader ideas of the self and learning. These ideas have been applied across disciplines, heavily influencing one branch of rhetorical studies.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric then, is the idea that persuasion is most effective when the positions on all side of the argument are understood, and a connection is made between the people involved. Terms such as non-combative and person-centered are some of the theory's watch-words.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric typically consists of 4 main stages:<br /> # An introduction to the problem and a demonstration that the opponent's position is understood.<br /> # A statement of the contexts in which the opponent's position may be valid.<br /> # A statement of the writer's position, including the contexts in which it is valid.<br /> # A statement of how the opponent's position would benefit if he were to adopt elements of the writer's position. If the writer can show that the positions complement each other, that each supplies what the other lacks, so much the better (Brent)<br /> <br /> <br /> [[Douglas Brent]]: [[Rogerian Rhetoric as an alternative to Traditional Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]], 1929-1998: [[argument as emergence toward the other]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics ''Semiotics''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]], 1857-1913: [[signified and signifier are core of semiotics]]<br /> <br /> [[Roland Barthes]], 1915-1980: author and scriptor, neutral and novelistic writing<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], 1895-1975: [[Polyphony]], [[Unfinalizability]], [[Carnival and Grotesque]], [[Chronotope]], [[Heteroglossia]] (&quot;The Dialogic Imagination&quot;), [[Speech genres]]<br /> <br /> == Writing and Technology ==<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]], b. 1944:<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]]: [[Influential Role in &quot;Computers in the Composition Classroom&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]: [[Computer Interface as Representation of Oppression of Diverse Cultures]]<br /> <br /> == Uncategorized ==<br /> <br /> '''Authors'''<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]], 1922-2009: [[Toulmin Model of Argument]]<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]], b. 1928: [[Epistemic Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]], b. 1931: <br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]], b. 1939: [[Rhetoric in Existentialist Literature]]<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]]:<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]]:<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]:<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]: <br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]:<br /> <br /> [[Steven Fraiberg]]:<br /> <br /> Sorapure et al.?<br /> <br /> Palmquist et al.?<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]] and [[Steven D. Krause]]:<br /> <br /> [[Douglas Downs]] and [[Elizabeth Wardle]]:<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Theories/Movements'''<br /> <br /> [[Belletristic/Elocution]]<br /> <br /> [[Semanticism]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Theories_and_Movements 2012-04-13T18:48:47Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>This page discusses key rhetorical movements and the theories associated with those movements.<br /> <br /> == Conservatism ==<br /> <br /> [[Richard Weaver]], 1910-1963: man's nature is fourfold (rational, emotional, ethical, religious), [[God and Devil Terms]], [[Noble Rhetoric]], [[Anti-Nominalism]]<br /> <br /> == Emerging Media ==<br /> =Video Games=<br /> =Film=<br /> =Blogging=<br /> =Fan Fiction=<br /> <br /> ==Feminist Criticism==<br /> <br /> [[Celeste Condit]], author of [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335639209384002#preview &quot;Post-Burke: Transcending the Sub-Stance of Dramatism&quot;] (1992).<br /> <br /> [[Phyllis M. Japp]], author of “Can This Marriage Be Saved? Reclaiming Burke for Feminist Scholarship&quot; from [http://books.google.com/books?id=CcD9wYsIy1kC&amp;pg=PA113&amp;lpg=PA113&amp;dq=Can+This+Marriage+Be+Saved?+Reclaiming+Burke+for+Feminist+Scholarship&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=0VKRayAKL4&amp;sig=ngZCugp8lAoRrM0FwJ9pjQqId5Y&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=sTeHT_eJG4aS8AG5sf2VCA&amp;ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=Can%20This%20Marriage%20Be%20Saved%3F%20Reclaiming%20Burke%20for%20Feminist%20Scholarship&amp;f=false Kenneth Burke and the 21st Century] (1999).<br /> <br /> == Literary Criticism ==<br /> <br /> [[I. A. Richards]], 1893-1979: father of [[New Criticism]]<br /> <br /> == New Rhetorics ==<br /> <br /> [[Donald C. Bryant]], 1905-1987: [[definitions of rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Kenneth Burke]], 1897-1993: [[Dramatistic Pentad]] (act, scene, agent, agency, purpose), [[Definition of Man]] as symbol-using animal<br /> <br /> [http://4341.quinnwarnick.com/wiki/Chaim_Perelman Chaim Perelman], 1912-1984: [[New Rhetorics]]<br /> <br /> == Pedagogical Studies ==<br /> <br /> [[Lisa S. Ede]], b. 1947: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Andrea A. Lunsford]], b. 1942: [[Distinctions Between Classical and Modern Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-structuralism ''Post-Structuralism''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Michel Foucault]], 1926-1984: [[author-function]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogerian_argument ''Rogerian Rhetoric''] ==<br /> Rogerian rhetoric is derived from the theories of Carl Rogers. Rogers originally developed his ideas as a method of therapy that was centered around understanding the person being treated. Initially called non-directive therapy, this system became the foundation for Rogers' broader ideas of the self and learning. These ideas have been applied across disciplines, heavily influencing one branch of rhetorical studies.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric then, is the idea that persuasion is most effective when the positions on all side of the argument are understood, and a connection is made between the people involved. Terms such as non-combative and person-centered are some of the theory's watch-words.<br /> <br /> Rogerian rhetoric typically consists of 4 main stages:<br /> # An introduction to the problem and a demonstration that the opponent's position is understood.<br /> # A statement of the contexts in which the opponent's position may be valid.<br /> # A statement of the writer's position, including the contexts in which it is valid.<br /> # A statement of how the opponent's position would benefit if he were to adopt elements of the writer's position. If the writer can show that the positions complement each other, that each supplies what the other lacks, so much the better (Brent)<br /> <br /> <br /> [[Douglas Brent]]: [[Rogerian Rhetoric as an alternative to Traditional Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Jim W. Corder]], 1929-1998: [[argument as emergence toward the other]]<br /> <br /> == [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics ''Semiotics''] ==<br /> <br /> [[Ferdinand de Saussure]], 1857-1913: [[signified and signifier are core of semiotics]]<br /> <br /> [[Roland Barthes]], 1915-1980: author and scriptor, neutral and novelistic writing<br /> <br /> [[Mikhail Bakhtin]], 1895-1975: [[Polyphony]], [[Unfinalizability]], [[Carnival and Grotesque]], [[Chronotope]], [[Heteroglossia]] (&quot;The Dialogic Imagination&quot;), [[Speech genres]]<br /> <br /> == Writing and Technology ==<br /> <br /> [[Dennis Baron]], b. 1944:<br /> <br /> [[Cynthia L. Selfe]]: [[Influential Role in &quot;Computers in the Composition Classroom&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard J. Selfe Jr.]]: [[Computer Interface as Representation of Oppression of Diverse Cultures]]<br /> <br /> == Uncategorized ==<br /> <br /> '''Authors'''<br /> <br /> [[Stephen Toulmin]], 1922-2009: [[Toulmin Model of Argument]]<br /> <br /> [[Robert L. Scott]], b. 1928: [[Epistemic Rhetoric]]<br /> <br /> [[Richard Ohmann]], b. 1931: <br /> <br /> [[S. Michael Halloran]], b. 1939: [[Rhetoric in Existentialist Literature]]<br /> <br /> [[John M. Slatin]]:<br /> <br /> [[Kathleen Blake Yancey]]:<br /> <br /> [[Johndan Johnson-Eilola]]:<br /> <br /> [[John Logie]]: <br /> <br /> [[Sean D. Williams]]:<br /> <br /> [[Steven Fraiberg]]:<br /> <br /> Sorapure et al.?<br /> <br /> Palmquist et al.?<br /> <br /> [[Bill Hart-Davidson]] and [[Steven D. Krause]]:<br /> <br /> [[Douglas Downs]] and [[Elizabeth Wardle]]:<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Theories/Movements'''<br /> <br /> [[Belletristic/Elocution]]<br /> <br /> [[Semanticism]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Fantasy_Theme_Analysis%22 2012-04-13T18:38:02Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Similar to Symbolic Convergence Theory, Fantasy Theme Analysis is a communication theory described by Ernest G. Bormann to explain how cultural communities form.<br /> <br /> FTA suggests that two or more people engaging in communication will eventually develop a shared view of reality, or a common way of explaining their experiences. As this view begins to encompass more and more people, a rhetorical vision emerges, as in the case of national identities or corporate missions.<br /> <br /> This view of reality is often expressed as a fantasy theme, or a dramatistic fulfillment of the view of reality. One assumption made by Bormann in FTA theory is that meaning and hidden ideals are found in action, rather than in the minds of the actor.<br /> <br /> As time progresses, entire moral value systems emerge out of the shared view of reality, which, Bormann states, help people to understand, cope with, and internalize events happening around them. For example, a common fantasy theme in the US is the &quot;rags to riches&quot; expression of human experience. It is glorified and as such it becomes ingrained into the cultural consciousness, until individuals develop a subconscious (&quot;knee-jerk&quot;) reaction to the story, where individuals understand the here-and-now theme of rags-to-riches in the case of one person in terms of all the previous rags-to-riches stories the individual has ever experienced in the past. In many ways, Fantasy Theme Analysis shares many common themes with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28psychology%29 ''Attribution Theory'']. <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://www.nationalforensics.org/journal/vol3no2-2.pdf ''Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Fantasy_Theme_Analysis%22 2012-04-13T18:37:28Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Similar to Symbolic Convergence Theory, Fantasy Theme Analysis is a communication theory described by Ernest G. Bormann to explain how cultural communities form.<br /> <br /> FTA suggests that two or more people engaging in communication will eventually develop a shared view of reality, or a common way of explaining their experiences. As this view begins to encompass more and more people, a rhetorical vision emerges, as in the case of national identities or corporate missions.<br /> <br /> This view of reality is often expressed as a fantasy theme, or a dramatistic fulfillment of the view of reality. One assumption made by Bormann in FTA theory is that meaning and hidden ideals are found in action, rather than in the minds of the actor.<br /> <br /> As time progresses, entire moral value systems emerge out of the shared view of reality, which, Bormann states, help people to understand, cope with, and internalize events happening around them. For example, a common fantasy theme in the US is the &quot;rags to riches&quot; expression of human experience. It is glorified and as such it becomes ingrained into the cultural consciousness, until individuals develop a subconscious (&quot;knee-jerk&quot;) reaction to the story, where individuals understand the here-and-now theme of rags-to-riches in the case of one person in terms of all the previous rags-to-riches stories the individual has ever experienced in the past. In many ways, Fantasy Theme Analysis shares many common themes with [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28psychology%29 ''Attribution Theory'']] . <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://www.nationalforensics.org/journal/vol3no2-2.pdf ''Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Fantasy_Theme_Analysis%22 2012-04-13T18:37:06Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Similar to [[&quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]], Fantasy Theme Analysis is a communication theory described by [[Ernest G. Bormann]] to explain how cultural communities form.<br /> <br /> FTA suggests that two or more people engaging in communication will eventually develop a shared view of reality, or a common way of explaining their experiences. As this view begins to encompass more and more people, a rhetorical vision emerges, as in the case of national identities or corporate missions.<br /> <br /> This view of reality is often expressed as a fantasy theme, or a dramatistic fulfillment of the view of reality. One assumption made by Bormann in FTA theory is that meaning and hidden ideals are found in action, rather than in the minds of the actor.<br /> <br /> As time progresses, entire moral value systems emerge out of the shared view of reality, which, Bormann states, help people to understand, cope with, and internalize events happening around them. For example, a common fantasy theme in the US is the &quot;rags to riches&quot; expression of human experience. It is glorified and as such it becomes ingrained into the cultural consciousness, until individuals develop a subconscious (&quot;knee-jerk&quot;) reaction to the story, where individuals understand the here-and-now theme of rags-to-riches in the case of one person in terms of all the previous rags-to-riches stories the individual has ever experienced in the past. In many ways, Fantasy Theme Analysis shares many common themes with [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28psychology%29 ''Attribution Theory'']] . <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://www.nationalforensics.org/journal/vol3no2-2.pdf ''Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Fantasy_Theme_Analysis%22 2012-04-13T18:36:09Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Similar to [[Symbolic Convergence Theory]], Fantasy Theme Analysis is a communication theory described by [[Ernest G. Bormann]] to explain how cultural communities form.<br /> <br /> FTA suggests that two or more people engaging in communication will eventually develop a shared view of reality, or a common way of explaining their experiences. As this view begins to encompass more and more people, a rhetorical vision emerges, as in the case of national identities or corporate missions.<br /> <br /> This view of reality is often expressed as a fantasy theme, or a dramatistic fulfillment of the view of reality. One assumption made by Bormann in FTA theory is that meaning and hidden ideals are found in action, rather than in the minds of the actor.<br /> <br /> As time progresses, entire moral value systems emerge out of the shared view of reality, which, Bormann states, help people to understand, cope with, and internalize events happening around them. For example, a common fantasy theme in the US is the &quot;rags to riches&quot; expression of human experience. It is glorified and as such it becomes ingrained into the cultural consciousness, until individuals develop a subconscious (&quot;knee-jerk&quot;) reaction to the story, where individuals understand the here-and-now theme of rags-to-riches in the case of one person in terms of all the previous rags-to-riches stories the individual has ever experienced in the past. In many ways, Fantasy Theme Analysis shares many common themes with [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28psychology%29 ''Attribution Theory'']] . <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://www.nationalforensics.org/journal/vol3no2-2.pdf ''Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Fantasy_Theme_Analysis%22 2012-04-13T18:17:38Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: Created page with &quot;== Brief Summary == == References == : [http://www.nationalforensics.org/journal/vol3no2-2.pdf ''Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism''] == Applications ...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://www.nationalforensics.org/journal/vol3no2-2.pdf ''Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:14:28Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* Brief Summary */</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a very different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it in the context of video games, film, and literature. A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;) <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52).<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> : [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00909888209365212 ''The Symbolic Convergence Theory of Communication: Applications and Implications for Teachers and Consultants'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:13:28Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* Brief Summary */</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;) <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52).<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> : [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00909888209365212 ''The Symbolic Convergence Theory of Communication: Applications and Implications for Teachers and Consultants'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:13:11Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* References */</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;) <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52). <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> : [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00909888209365212 ''The Symbolic Convergence Theory of Communication: Applications and Implications for Teachers and Consultants'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:12:44Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* References */</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;) <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52). <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> : [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00909888209365212 ''The symbolic convergence theory of communication: Applications and implications for teachers and consultants'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:10:53Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* References */</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;) <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52). <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:09:53Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;) <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52). <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> &lt;references /&gt;<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:09:35Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;). <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy&quot;]). Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52). <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> &lt;references /&gt;<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann,_Ernest_G._%22Symbolic_Convergence_Theory%22 2012-04-13T18:08:17Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: Created page with &quot;== Brief Summary == Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective u...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>== Brief Summary ==<br /> Symbolic Convergence Theory, a general theory of communication developed by Ernest G. Bormann, can be defined succinctly as a human community’s collective use of common symbols to make sense of the human world around them.<br /> <br /> Bormann explains SCT as a method by which individuals and groups make sense of the world around them (53). Bormann refers to “fantasy themes” and “fantasy types” (51-52); fantasy, he states, is a term having a substantially different meaning from the normal notion of fantasy as we tend to think of it (as in video games, film, and literature). A '''fantasy theme''' is a word or set of words that symbolically represent events or an idea removed from the &quot;here and now&quot; of a group (e.g. the American Dream). A '''fantasy type''' is a fantasy theme that occurs across cultural boundaries or between communities (e.g. the stereotype of &quot;daddy issues.&quot;). <br /> <br /> In Bormann’s terms, fantasy has less to do with imagination or non-reality and more to do with how groups construct their own realities (he cites the [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fantasy Greek etymology of the word &quot;fantasy.&quot;]) Humans assign deep (symbolic) meaning to other humans’ actions, thereby translating concrete motion into symbolic motion with abstract meaning (51). Convergence occurs when multiple individuals ascribe the same meaning to things; they now have something in common, and they develop communication cultures (ie, inside jokes) based on these commonalities (52). Fantasy themes and fantasy types can be thought of as cognitive stereotypes - we observe a situation, and in order to understand it, we relate it to a fantasy type (a commonly recurring situation) and thereby categorize it according to previous knowledge (52). <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> &lt;references /&gt;<br /> <br /> == Applications of Theory ==<br /> <br /> Bormann states that the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication is “well-adapted to a mass media society” (60), and that SCT is universally applicable as a communication theory (51). Whether &quot;universally applicable&quot; communication theories still hold up as mass media evolves and transforms the way people communicate is a common point of contention among media scholars, notably [http://www.henryjenkins.org/ ''Henry Jenkins''].</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann_Ernest_G. 2012-04-13T17:44:51Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* Article Summaries */</p> <hr /> <div>Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) was a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories are intended as universal explanations of how human communities understand and make sense of human action.<br /> <br /> == Biography ==<br /> Ernest G. Bormann was Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Communication. He received his B.A. from the University of South Dakota in 1949, and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in 1953.<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest G. &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest G. &quot;Fantasy Theme Analysis&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=DM_ucVv0W-EC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;ots=6RnLs1L5RC&amp;sig=mh4FL07p8kr09Vk08VU_yqvlI0U#v=onepage&amp;q=ernest%20bormann&amp;f=false ''The Force of Fantasy: Restoring the American Dream'']<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?id=9V12AAAAMAAJ&amp;q=ernest+bormann&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=V2KIT4j1LaeQ2QWw8_XMCQ&amp;ved=0CFMQ6AEwBA ''Forerunners of Black Power: the Rhetoric of Abolition'']<br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> : [http://www.joshiejuice.com/articles/fantasy.pdf ''Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality'']<br /> <br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Bormann ''Wikipedia's entry on Ernest Bormann'']<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Article_Summaries 2012-04-13T17:43:12Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* A-D */</p> <hr /> <div>This page links to in-depth article summaries from prominent authors in this field. Links are organized by author's last name.<br /> <br /> == A-D == <br /> * [[Aristotle, Poetics]]<br /> * [[Aristotle, Rhetoric]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Bakhtin, Mikhail &quot;Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences&quot;]]<br /> * [[Baron, Dennis &quot;From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technology&quot;]]<br /> * [[Barthes, Roland &quot;Death of the Author&quot;]]<br /> * [[Blythe, Stuart &quot;Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bitzer, Lloyd &quot;The Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bormann, Ernest G. &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> * [[Brent, Douglas &quot;Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Bryant, Donald C. &quot;Rhetoric: Its Functions and Its Scope&quot;]]<br /> * [[Burke, Kenneth &quot;Definition of Man&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Corder, Jim W. &quot;Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love&quot;]]<br /> * [[&quot;CCCC Position Statement&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Delagrange, Susan &quot;When Reflection is Re-Design: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship&quot;]]<br /> * [[DePew, Kevin Eric “Through the Eyes of Researchers, Rhetors, and Audiences”]]<br /> * [[Downs, Douglas and Elizabeth Wardle “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> <br /> == E-H ==<br /> * [[Ede, Lisa S. and Andrea A. Lunsford &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> * [[Ehninger, Douglas &quot;On Systems of Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Fisher, Walter &quot;Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm&quot;]]<br /> * [[Foucault, Michel &quot;What Is an Author?&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> * [[Hea, Amy C. Kimme &quot;Riding The Wave&quot;]]<br /> * [[Halloran, Michael S. &quot;On the End of Rhetoric: Classical and Modern&quot;]]<br /> * [[Hart-Davidson, Bill and Steven D. Krause “Re: The Future of Computers and Writing: A Multivocal Textumentary”]]<br /> <br /> == I-L ==<br /> * [[Jenkins, Henry &quot;Eight Traits of the New Media Landscape&quot;]]<br /> * [[Johnson-Eilola, Johndan “Negative Spaces: From Production to Connection in Composition”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Logie, John “Champing at the Bits: Computers, Copyright, ad the Composition Classroom”]]<br /> * [[Lunsford, Andrea and Lisa Ede &quot;On Distinctions between Classical and Modern Rhetoric&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == M-P ==<br /> * [[McIntire-Strasburg, Janice &quot;Multimedia Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[McKeon, Richard “The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts”]]<br /> * [[Moeller, Ryan and David Christensen &quot;System Mapping: A Genre Field Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Grant Proposal and Funding Process&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Ohmann, Richard “In Lieu of a New Rhetoric”]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Palmquist, Mike, Kate Kiefer, James Hartvigsen, and Barbara Goodlew &quot;Contrasts: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms&quot;]]<br /> * [[Perelman, Chaïm &quot;The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning&quot;]]<br /> == Q-T ==<br /> * [[Richards, I.A. &quot;How to Read a Page&quot;]]<br /> * [[Rickly, Rebecca &quot;Messy Contexts: Research as a Rhetorical Situation&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Saussure, Ferdinand de &quot;Nature of the Linguistic Sign&quot;]]<br /> * [[Scott, Robert L. &quot;On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sidler, Michelle &quot;Playing Scavenger and Gazer with Scientific Discourse: Opportunities and Ethics for Online Research&quot;]]<br /> * [[Selfe, Cynthia L. &amp; Richard J. Selfe Jr. &quot;The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones&quot;]]<br /> * [[Slatin, John M. &quot;Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> * [[Sorapure, Madeleine, Pamela Inglesby, and George Yatchisin &quot;Web Literacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Research in a New Medium&quot;]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Toulmin, Stephen &quot;The Layout of Arguments&quot;]]<br /> == U-X ==<br /> * [[Vatz, Richard &quot;The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation]]<br /> :<br /> :<br /> * [[Wardle, Elizabeth and Douglas Downs “Teaching About Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning 'First Year Composition' as 'Introduction to Writing Studies'”]]<br /> * [[Weaver, Richard &quot;The Cultural Role of Rhetoric]]<br /> * [[Williams, Sean D. &quot;Part 2: Toward an Integrated Composition Pedagogy in Hypertext&quot;]]<br /> == Y &amp; Z ==<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Looking for Sources of Coherence in a Fragmented World: Notes toward a New Assessment Design&quot;]]<br /> * [[Yancey, Kathleen Blake &quot;Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key&quot;]]</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann_Ernest_G. 2012-04-13T17:41:30Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) was a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories are intended as universal explanations of how human communities understand and make sense of human action.<br /> <br /> == Biography ==<br /> Ernest G. Bormann was Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Communication. He received his B.A. from the University of South Dakota in 1949, and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in 1953.<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Fantasy Theme Analysis&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=DM_ucVv0W-EC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;ots=6RnLs1L5RC&amp;sig=mh4FL07p8kr09Vk08VU_yqvlI0U#v=onepage&amp;q=ernest%20bormann&amp;f=false ''The Force of Fantasy: Restoring the American Dream'']<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?id=9V12AAAAMAAJ&amp;q=ernest+bormann&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=V2KIT4j1LaeQ2QWw8_XMCQ&amp;ved=0CFMQ6AEwBA ''Forerunners of Black Power: the Rhetoric of Abolition'']<br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> : [http://www.joshiejuice.com/articles/fantasy.pdf ''Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality'']<br /> <br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Bormann ''Wikipedia's entry on Ernest Bormann'']<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann_Ernest_G. 2012-04-13T17:40:41Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) was a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories are intended as universal explanations of how human communities understand and make sense of human action.<br /> <br /> == Biography ==<br /> Ernest G. Bormann was Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Communication. He received his B.A. from the University of South Dakota in 1949, and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in 1953.<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Fantasy Theme Analysis&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=DM_ucVv0W-EC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;ots=6RnLs1L5RC&amp;sig=mh4FL07p8kr09Vk08VU_yqvlI0U#v=onepage&amp;q=ernest%20bormann&amp;f=false ''The Force of Fantasy: Restoring the American Dream'']<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?id=9V12AAAAMAAJ&amp;q=ernest+bormann&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=V2KIT4j1LaeQ2QWw8_XMCQ&amp;ved=0CFMQ6AEwBA ''Forerunners of Black Power: the Rhetoric of Abolition'']<br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> : [http://www.joshiejuice.com/articles/fantasy.pdf ''Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality'']<br /> <br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Bormann ''Brittanica's entry on Roland Barthes'']<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann_Ernest_G. 2012-04-13T17:40:24Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) was a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories are intended as universal explanations of how human communities understand and make sense of human action.<br /> <br /> == Biography ==<br /> Bormann was Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Communication. He received his B.A. from the University of South Dakota in 1949, and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in 1953.<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Fantasy Theme Analysis&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=DM_ucVv0W-EC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;ots=6RnLs1L5RC&amp;sig=mh4FL07p8kr09Vk08VU_yqvlI0U#v=onepage&amp;q=ernest%20bormann&amp;f=false ''The Force of Fantasy: Restoring the American Dream'']<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?id=9V12AAAAMAAJ&amp;q=ernest+bormann&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=V2KIT4j1LaeQ2QWw8_XMCQ&amp;ved=0CFMQ6AEwBA ''Forerunners of Black Power: the Rhetoric of Abolition'']<br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> : [http://www.joshiejuice.com/articles/fantasy.pdf ''Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality'']<br /> <br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Bormann ''Brittanica's entry on Roland Barthes'']<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann_Ernest_G. 2012-04-13T17:39:59Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: </p> <hr /> <div>Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) was a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories are intended as universal explanations of how human communities understand and make sense of human action.<br /> <br /> == Biography ==<br /> Bormann was Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Communication. He received his B.A. from the University of South Dakota in 1949, and his M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in 1953.<br /> <br /> == Article Summaries ==<br /> <br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Symbolic Convergence Theory&quot;]]<br /> [[Bormann, Ernest &quot;Fantasy Theme Analysis&quot;]]<br /> <br /> == Additional Works/ Publications ==<br /> <br /> ==== Books ====<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=DM_ucVv0W-EC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;ots=6RnLs1L5RC&amp;sig=mh4FL07p8kr09Vk08VU_yqvlI0U#v=onepage&amp;q=ernest%20bormann&amp;f=false ''The Force of Fantasy: Restoring the American Dream'']<br /> <br /> : [http://books.google.com/books?id=9V12AAAAMAAJ&amp;q=ernest+bormann&amp;dq=ernest+bormann&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=V2KIT4j1LaeQ2QWw8_XMCQ&amp;ved=0CFMQ6AEwBA ''Forerunners of Black Power: the Rhetoric of Abolition'']<br /> <br /> ==== Articles/Essays ====<br /> <br /> : [http://www.joshiejuice.com/articles/fantasy.pdf ''Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality'']<br /> <br /> <br /> : [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x/abstract ''Symbolic Convergence Theory: a Communication Formulation'']<br /> <br /> == Further Readings ==<br /> <br /> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Bormann ''Brittanica's entry on Roland Barthes'']<br /> <br /> == Other Scholarly Views ==<br /> <br /> ==== Agreement ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Opposition ====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> == External Links ==</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Bormann_Ernest_G. 2012-04-13T17:20:19Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: Created page with &quot;Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) is a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>Ernest Bormann (1925-2008) is a communications scholar, most noted for authoring the Symbolic Convergence Theory of communication as well as Fantasy Theme Analysis. Both theories are intended as universal explanations of how human communities understand and make sense of human action. <br /> <br /> Bormann was Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Department of Speech-Communication. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in 1959.</div>

Samuel Campbell https://rhetorclick.com/wiki/Authors 2012-04-13T17:11:52Z

<p>Samuel Campbell: /* A-D */</p> <hr /> <div>All authors are organized by their last names. Just click on the corresponding letter.<br /> <br /> == A-D ==<br /> <br /> *[[Aristotle]]<br /> *[[Mikhail_Bakhtin|Bakhtin, Mikhail]]<br /> *[[Cheryl E. Ball]]<br /> *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Baron Baron, Dennis]<br /> *[[Roland_Barthes|Barthes, Roland]]<br /> *[[Lloyd_Bitzer|Bitzer, Lloyd]]<br /> *[[Patricia_Bizzell|Bizzell, Patricia]]<br /> *[[Stuart_Blythe|Blythe, Stuart]]<br /> *[[Brent_Douglas|Brent, Douglas]]<br /> *[[Donald_C._Bryant|Bryant, Donald C.]]<br /> *[[Bormann_Ernest_G.|Bormann, Ernest G.]]<br /> *[[Kenneth_Burke|Burke, Kenneth]]<br /> *[[Jim_W._Corder|Corder, Jim W.]]<br /> *[[Kevin_Eric_DePew|DePew, Kevin Eric]]<br /> *[[Douglas_Downs|Downs, Douglas]]<br /> <br /> == E-H ==<br /> <br /> *[[Lisa_S._Ede|Ede, Lisa S.]]<br /> *[[Douglas_Ehninger|Ehninger, Douglas]]<br /> *[[Walter_Fisher|Fisher, Walter]]<br /> *[[Michel_Foucault|Foucault, Michel]]<br /> *[[Michael_S._Halloran|Halloran, Michael S.]]<br /> *[[Bill_Hart-Davidson|Hart-Davidson, Bill]]<br /> <br /> <br /> == I-L ==<br /> <br /> *[[Johndan_Johnson-Eilola|Johnson-Eilola, Johndan]]<br /> *[[Steven_D._Krause|Krause, Steven D.]]<br /> *[[John_Logie|Logie, John]]<br /> *[[Andrea_A._Lunsford|Lunsford, Andrea A.]]<br /> <br /> == M-P ==<br /> <br /> *[[Janice_McIntire-Strasburg|McIntire-Strasburg, Janice]]<br /> *[[Richard_McKeon|McKeon, Richard]]<br /> *[[Richard_Ohmann|Ohmann, Richard]]<br /> *[[Mike_Palmquist|Palmquist, Mike]]<br /> *[[Chaim_Perelman|Perelman, Chaim]]<br /> *[[Plato]]<br /> <br /> == Q-T ==<br /> <br /> *[[I._A._Richards|Richards, I. A.]]<br /> *[[Rebecca_Rickly|Rickly, Rebecca]]<br /> *[[Ferdinand_de_Saussure|Saussure, Ferdinand de]]<br /> *[[Robert_L._Scott|Scott, Robert L.]]<br /> *[[Cynthia_L._Selfe|Selfe, Cynthia L.]]<br /> *[[Richard_J._Selfe_Jr.|Selfe, Richard L.]]<br /> *[[Michelle_Sidler|Sidler, Michelle]]<br /> *[[John_M._Slatin|Slatin, John M.]]<br /> *[[Madeleine_Sorapure|Sorapure, Madeleine]]<br /> *[[Stephen_Toulmin|Toulmin, Stephen]]<br /> <br /> == U-Z ==<br /> <br /> *[[Richard_Vatz|Vatz, Richard]]<br /> *[[Elizabeth_Wardle|Wardle, Elizabeth]]<br /> *[[Quinn_Warnick|Warnick, Quinn]]<br /> *[[Richard_Weaver|Weaver, Richard]]<br /> *[[Sean_D._Williams|Williams, Sean D.]]<br /> *[[Kathleen_Blake_Yancey|Yancey, Kathleen Blake]]</div>

Samuel Campbell